Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:09:44.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the droplet size distribution in aerodynamic droplet breakup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2022

Isaac M. Jackiw Open the ORCID record for Isaac M. Jackiw [Opens in a new window]  and
Nasser Ashgriz Open the ORCID record for Nasser Ashgriz [Opens in a new window]
Isaac M. Jackiw
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
Nasser Ashgriz*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rim and bag dynamics in aerodynamic droplet breakup are investigated experimentally and theoretically. Three main modes contribute to the breakup sizes in aerodynamic droplet breakup: the rim node, the remaining rim and the bag breakup modes. However, existing models only consider one mode and are, therefore, unable to predict the size distribution. The present theoretical work seeks to model the dominant breakup mechanisms of each mode and to relate these mechanisms to the size distribution. It is shown that the nodes can be modelled using either the Rayleigh–Taylor or Rayleigh–Plateau instabilities with comparable results and that the variation in the node sizes results from the variation in the amount of mass in the rim that flows into the node prior to the rim breakup. The breakup of the rim is shown to be a result of a combination of the Rayleigh–Plateau instability and a newly proposed collision mechanism, wherein the impact of the corrugated receding rim of the bag with the main rim forces the main rim to break with the same wavelength as the receding rim. The resulting size distribution of the droplet breakup is estimated assuming that the relative weighting of the breakup mechanisms for each mode follows a two-parameter gamma distribution. The volume of each geometry is used to estimate the volume weighting of the modes, giving a reasonable prediction of the size distribution resulting from aerodynamic droplet breakup.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Aerosols/atomization Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Breakup/coalescence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 940 , 10 June 2022 , A17
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ANSYS Inc 2011 ANSYS FLUENT User's Guide Release 14.0. Canonsburg, PA.Google Scholar
Ashgriz, N. 2011 Handbook of Atomization and Sprays: Theory and Applications. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behzad, M., Ashgriz, N. & Karney, B.W. 2016 Surface breakup of a non-turbulent liquid jet injected into a high pressure gaseous crossflow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 80, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostwick, J.B. & Steen, P.H. 2010 Stability of constrained cylindrical interfaces and the torus lift of Plateau-Rayleigh. J. Fluid Mech. 647, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourouiba, L. 2021 The fluid dynamics of disease transmission. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 473–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Chou, W.-H. & Faeth, G. 1998 Temporal properties of secondary drop breakup in the bag breakup regime. Intl. J. Multiphase Flow 24 (6), 889–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culick, F.E.C. 1960 Comments on a ruptured soap film. J. Appl. Phys. 31 (6), 1128–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Z. & Faeth, G.M. 2001 Temporal properties of secondary drop breakup in the multimode breakup regime. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 27, 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flock, A.K., Guildenbecher, D.R., Chen, J., Sojka, P.E. & Bauer, H.-J. 2012 Experimental statistics of droplet trajectory and air flow during aerodynamic fragmentation of liquid drops. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 47, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.P. & Middleman, S. 1966 Newtonian jet stability. AIChE J. 12 (4), 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guildenbecher, D.R., Gao, J., Chen, J. & Sojka, P.E. 2017 Characterization of drop aerodynamic fragmentation in the bag and sheet-thinning regimes by crossed-beam, two-view, digital in-line holography. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 94, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guildenbecher, D.R., López-Rivera, C. & Sojka, P.E. 2009 Secondary atomization. Exp. Fluids 46 (3), 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J. & Tryggvason, G. 2001 Secondary breakup of a axisymmetric liquid drops. II. Impulsive acceleration. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1554–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiang, L.P. & Faeth, G.M. 1992 Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 18 (5), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackiw, I.M. & Ashgriz, N. 2021 On aerodynamic droplet breakup. J. Fluid Mech. 913, A33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S.S., Tyagi, N., Prakash, R.S., Ravikrishna, R.V. & Tomar, G. 2019 Secondary breakup of drops at moderate Weber numbers: effect of density ratio and Reynolds number. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 117, 25–41. arXiv: 1803.02989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalaal, M. & Mehravaran, K. 2014 Transient growth of droplet instabilities in a stream. Phys. Fluids 26, 012101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrahbashi, D., Sirignano, W.A., Popov, P.P. & Hussain, F. 2016 Early spray development at high gas density: hole, ligament and bridge formations. J. Fluid Mech. 792, 186–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D.D., Beavers, G.S. & Funada, T. 2002 Rayleigh–Taylor instability of viscoelastic drops at high weber numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshavarz, B., Houze, E.C., Moore, J.R., Koerner, M.R. & McKinley, G.H. 2020 Rotary atomization of newtonian and viscoelastic liquids. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (3), 033601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krechetnikov, R. 2010 Stability of liquid sheet edges. Phys. Fluids 22 (9), 092101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhuissier, H. & Villermaux, E. 2009 Soap films burst like flapping flags. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (5), 054501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lhuissier, H. & Villermaux, E. 2011 The destabilization of an initially thick liquid sheet edge. Phys. Fluids 23 (9), 091705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhuissier, H. & Villermaux, E. 2012 Bursting bubble aerosols. J. Fluid Mech. 696, 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcotte, F. & Zaleski, S. 2019 Density contrast matters for drop fragmentation thresholds at low Ohnesorge number. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (10), 1–16. arXiv:1907.10711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmottant, P.H. & Villermaux, E. 2004 On spray formation. J. Fluid Mech. 498 (498), 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, H. & Feng, J.J. 2013 Capillary breakup of a liquid torus. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néel, B., Lhuissier, H. & Villermaux, E. 2020 ’Fines’ from the collision of liquid rims. J. Fluid Mech. 893, A16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obenauf, D.G. & Sojka, P.E. 2021 Theoretical deformation modeling and drop size prediction in the multimode breakup regime theoretical deformation modeling and drop size prediction in the multimode breakup regime. Phys. Fluids 33, 092113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opfer, L., Roisman, I.V., Venzmer, J., Klostermann, M. & Tropea, C. 2014 Droplet-air collision dynamics: evolution of the film thickness. Phys. Rev. E 89 (1), 013023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Rourke, P.J. & Amsden, A.A. 1987 The tab method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup. SAE Tech. Paper Series 872089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilch, M. & Erdman, C.A. 1987 Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 13 (6), 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulain, S., Villermaux, E. & Bourouiba, L. 2018 Ageing and burst of surface bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 851, 636–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, L., Zhong, X., Zhu, C. & Lin, J. 2021 An experimental investigation on the secondary breakup of carboxymethyl cellulose droplets. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 136, 103526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranger, A.A. & Nicolls, J.A. 1969 Aerodynamic shattering of liquid drops. AIAA J. 7 (2), 285–290.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1878 On the instability of jets. Phil. Mag. 36, 4–13.Google Scholar
Rimbert, N., Castrillon Escobar, S., Meignen, R., Hadj-Achour, M. & Gradeck, M. 2020 Spheroidal droplet deformation, oscillation and breakup in uniform outer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 904, A15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savtchenko, S. & Ashgriz, N. 2005 Temporal instability of a capillary jet with a source of mass. Phys. Fluids 17 (11), 112102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., Singh, A.P., Rao, S.S., Kumar, A. & Basu, S. 2021 Shock induced aerobreakup of a droplet. J. Fluid Mech. 929, A27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strotos, G., Malgarinos, I., Nikolopoulos, N. & Gavaises, M. 2016 Predicting droplet deformation and breakup for moderate Weber numbers. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 85, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theofanous, G.T. & Li, J.G. 2008 On the physics of aerobreakup. Phys. Fluids 20 (5), 052103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theofanous, T.G., Li, G.J. & Dinh, T.N. 2004 Aerobreakup in rarefied supersonic gas flows. J. Fluids Engng 126 (4), 516–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. 2020 Fragmentation versus cohesion. J. Fluid Mech. 898, P1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Bossa, B. 2009 Single-drop fragmentation determines size distribution of raindrops. Nat. Phys. 5 (9), 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E., Marmottant, P. & Duplat, J. 2004 Ligament-mediated spray formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (7), 074501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villermaux, E., Pistre, V. & Lhuissier, H. 2013 The viscous savart sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vledouts, A., Quinard, J., Vandenberghe, N. & Villermaux, E. 2016 Explosive fragmentation of liquid shells. J. Fluid Mech. 788, 246–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. & Bourouiba, L. 2021 Growth and breakup of ligaments in unsteady fragmentation. J. Fluid Mech. 910, A39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Dandekar, R., Bustos, N., Poulain, S. & Bourouiba, L. 2018 Universal rim thickness in unsteady sheet fragmentation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (20), 204503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, F., Dianat, M. & McGuirk, J.J. 2016 A robust interface method for drop formation and breakup simulation at high density ratio using an extrapolated liquid velocity. Comput. Fluids 136, 402–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z., Wang, T. & Che, Z. 2020 Droplet deformation and breakup in shear flow of air. Phys. Fluids 32 (5), 052109.Google Scholar
Zandian, A., Sirignano, W.A. & Hussain, F. 2019 Vorticity dynamics in a spatially developing liquid jet inside a co-flowing gas. J. Fluid Mech. 877, 429–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Liu, H.-F., Cao, X.-K., Li, W.-F. & Xu, J.-L. 2011 Breakup characteristics of liquid drops in bag regime by a continuous and uniform air jet flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 37 (5), 530–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H., Liu, H.-F., Li, W.-F. & Xu, J.-L. 2010 Morphological classification of low viscosity drop bag breakup in a continuous air jet stream. Phys. Fluids 22, 114103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 1

Node formation and breakup on the rim. Experiment conditions are annotated with the elapsed non-dimensional time. In parentheses is the dimensional time in ms. Playback speed is 15 FPS.

Download Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 1.2 MB

Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 2

Nascent nodes on the receding rim of the bag. Experiment conditions are annotated with the elapsed non-dimensional time. In parentheses is the dimensional time in ms. Playback speed is 2 FPS.

Download Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 216.5 KB

Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 3

Collision of the corrugated receding rim with the main rim, instigating the breakup of the main rim. Experiment conditions are annotated with the elapsed non-dimensional time. In parentheses is the dimensional time in ms. Playback speed is 2 FPS.

Download Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 348.2 KB

Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 4

Example where both the Rayleigh-Plateau and the collision mechanism contribute to the breakup of the rim. Experiment conditions are annotated with the elapsed non-dimensional time. In parentheses is the dimensional time in ms. Playback speed is 5 FPS.

Download Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 744.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary material

Supplementary data

Download Jackiw and Ashgriz supplementary material(File)
File 37.3 KB