Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:36:47.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planar inviscid flows in a channel of finite length: washout, trapping and self-oscillations of vorticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2010

V. N. GOVORUKHIN ,
A. B. MORGULIS  and
V. A. VLADIMIROV
V. N. GOVORUKHIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, Southern Federal University, Melchakova Street 8a, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
A. B. MORGULIS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, Southern Federal University, Melchakova Street 8a, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia Southern Institute of Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Marcus Street 22, 362027 Vladikavkaz, Russia
V. A. VLADIMIROV*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper addresses the nonlinear dynamics of planar inviscid incompressible flows in the straight channel of a finite length. Our attention is focused on the effects of boundary conditions on vorticity dynamics. The renowned Yudovich's boundary conditions (YBC) are the normal component of velocity given at all boundaries, while vorticity is prescribed at an inlet only. The YBC are fully justified mathematically: the well posedness of the problem is proven. In this paper we study general nonlinear properties of channel flows with YBC. There are 10 main results in this paper: (i) the trapping phenomenon of a point vortex has been discovered, explained and generalized to continuously distributed vorticity such as vortex patches and harmonic perturbations; (ii) the conditions sufficient for decreasing Arnold's and enstrophy functionals have been found, these conditions lead us to the washout property of channel flows; (iii) we have shown that only YBC provide the decrease of Arnold's functional; (iv) three criteria of nonlinear stability of steady channel flows have been formulated and proven; (v) the counterbalance between the washout and trapping has been recognized as the main factor in the dynamics of vorticity; (vi) a physical analogy between the properties of inviscid channel flows with YBC, viscous flows and dissipative dynamical systems has been proposed; (vii) this analogy allows us to formulate two major conjectures (C1 and C2) which are related to the relaxation of arbitrary initial data to C1: steady flows, and C2: steady, self-oscillating or chaotic flows; (viii) a sufficient condition for the complete washout of fluid particles has been established; (ix) the nonlinear asymptotic stability of selected steady flows is proven and the related thresholds have been evaluated; (x) computational solutions that clarify C1 and C2 and discover three qualitatively different scenarios of flow relaxation have been obtained.

JFM classification

Mathematical Foundations: General fluid mechanics Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 659 , 25 September 2010 , pp. 420 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(This paper is dedicated to the memory of Victor Yudovich)

References

REFERENCES

Alekseev, G. 1972 On vanishing viscosity in the two dimensional steady problems of dynamics of an incompressible fluid. Dyn. Continuous Media (Dinamica Sploshnoy Sredy), 10, 5–28, Novosibirsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
Antontsev, S., Kazhikhov, A. & Monakhov, V. 1990 Boundary Value Problems in Mechanics of Inhomogeneous Fluids. Studies in Mathematics and Applications, vol. 22. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Aref, H. 1979 Motion of three vortices. Phys. Fluids, 22, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1966 On an a priori estimate in the theory of hydrodynamical stability. Izvestiya Visshikh Uchebnikh Zavedevniy, Matematika 5, 3–5 (in Russian); English translation in 1969 Am. Math. Soc. Trans. II 79, 267–269.Google Scholar
Aubry, A. & Chartier, P. 1998 A note on pseudo-symplectic Runge–Kutta methods. BIT 38 (4), 802–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1987 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, G. S. & Joseph, D. D. 1967 Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1967 Some developments in the theory of vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdichevskiy, V. L. 1983 Variational Principles in the Continuous Mechanics. Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Borisov, A. B, Mamaev, I. S. & Sokolovsky, M. A (ed.) 2003 Fundamental and Applied Problems of Vortex Dynamics. Institute of Computational Research Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Lopez, J. M. 1990 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown. Part II. Physical mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 221, 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, G. R. 1987 Rearrangements of functions, maximization of convex functionals, and vortex rings. Math. Annu. 276, 225–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, X. J., Flierl, G. R. & Polvani, L. M. 1989 The generation of tripoles from unstable axisymmetric isolated vortex structures. Europhys. Lett. 9, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshenko, S. 1988 The asymptotic form of a stationary separated flow around a solid at high Reynolds numbers. Appl. Math. Mech. 52, 746–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chossat, P. & Iooss, G. 1994 The Couette–Taylor Problem. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 102. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwang, A. T. 1983 A porous-wavemaker theory. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottet, G.-H. & Koumoutsakos, P. 1999 Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, S. 1991 Two-dimensional flow of a viscous fluid in a channel with porous walls. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doering, C. R., Spiegel, E. A. & Worthing, R. A. 2000 Energy dissipation in a shear layer with suction. Phys. Fluids 12 (8), 1955–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elcart, A., Fornberg, B., Horn, M. & Miller, K. 2000 Some steady vortex flows past a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 409, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elcart, A. & Miller, K. 2001 A monotone iteration for concentrated vortices. Nonlinear Anal. 44, 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornberg, B. 1993 Computing of steady incompressible flows past a blunt bodies – a historical overview. In Numerical Method for Fluid Dynamics (ed. Baines, M. J. & Morton, K. W.), vol. 4, pp. 115–135. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallaire, F. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2004 The role of boundary conditions in a simple model of incipient vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 16 (2), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Meleshko, V. V. & van Heijst, G. J. F. 1996 Motion of a two-dimensional monopolar vortex in a bounded rectangular domain. Phys. Fluids 8 (9), 2393–2399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbarg, D. & Trudinger, N. 1983 Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. 2nd edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Goldstik, M. 1963 A mathematical model of separated flow in an incompressible fluid. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 7, 1090–1093.Google Scholar
Goldshtik, M. & Javorsky, N. 1989 On the flow between a porous rotating disk and a plane. J. Fluid Mech. 207, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldshtik, M. & Hussain, F. 1998 Analysis of invicsid vortex breakdown in a semi-infinite pipe. Inviscid separation in steady planar flows. Fluid Dyn. Res. 23 (4), 189–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govorukhin, V. N. & Ilin, K. I. 2008 Numerical study of an inviscid incompressible fluid through a channel of finite length. Intl J. Numer. Methods Fluids 60 (12), 1315–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gröbli, W. 1877 Specialle Probleme über die Bewegung geredliniger parallierer Wirbelfäden. Vierteljahrsch. d. Nat.forsch. Geselsch. Zürich 22 (37–81), 129–165.Google Scholar
Hald, O. 1979 Convergence of vortex methods. Part II. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 16, 726–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haltiner, G. J. & Williams, R. T. 1980 Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. 2nd edn. Wiley.Google Scholar
van Heijst, G. J. F. & Kloosterziel, R. 1989 Tripolar vortices in a rotating fluid. Nature 338, 569–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilin, K. I. 2008 Viscous boundary layers in flows through a domain with permeable boundary. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 27, 514–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazhikhov, A. 1981 Note on the formulation of the problem of flow through a bounded region using equations of perfect fluid. Appl. Math. Mech. 44, 672–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kizner, Z. & Kholves, R. 2004 The tripolar vortex: experimental evidence and explicit solutions. Phys. Rev. E 70, 016307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochin, N. 1956 On the existence theorem in hydrodynamics. Appl. Math. Mech. (Prikl. Mat. Mekh.) 20 (2), 153–172 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kozlov, V. V. 2003 General Theory of Vortices. Dynamical Systems X. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 67. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.-G. & Xin, Z. 2000 Convergence of Galerkin method for 2-D discontinuous Euler flows. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 53 (6), 786–798.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, J. M. 1990 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown. Part I. Confined swirling flow. J. Fluid Mech. 221, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, J. M. & Perry, A. D. 1992 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown. Part III. Onset of periodic flow and chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martemianov, S. & Okulov, V. L. 2004 On heat transfer enhancement in swirl pipe flows. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 2379–2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meleshko, V. V. & Konstantinov, M. Yu. 1993 Dynamics of Vortex Structures. Naukova Dumka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Moshkin, N. & Mounnamprang, P. 2003 Numerical simulation of vortical ideal fluid flow through curved channel. Intl J. Numer. Methods Fluids 41, 1173–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1985 Magnetostatic equilibria and analogous Euler flows of arbitrarily complex topology. Part. I. Fundamentals. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1986 On the existence of localized rotational disturbances which propagate without change of structure in an inviscid fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, Y. G. & Carton, X. J. 1994 Multipolar vortices in two-dimensional incompressible flows. J. Fluid Mech. 267, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgulis, A. B. 2005 High-frequency asymptotic for the forced periodical flows of an inviscid fluid through a given domain. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 7, S94–S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgulis, A. B. & Vladimirov, V. A. 2008 Dynamics of a solid affected by a pulsating point source of fluid. In Hamiltonian Dynamics, Vortex Structures, Turbulence. IUTAM Bookseries, vol. 6, 135–150. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgulis, A. & Yudovich, V. 2002 Arnold's method for asymptotic stability of steady inviscid incompressible flow through a fixed domain with permeable boundary. Chaos 12 (2), 356–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlandi, P. & van Heijst, G. J. F. 1992 Numerical simulations of tripolar vortices in 2D flows. Fluid. Dyn. Res. 9, 1147–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedley, T. J. 1980 The Fluid Mechanics of Large Blood Vessels. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, N. 2001 Steady streaming. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, N. M. & Simon, A. 1964 Necessary and sufficient condition for the stability of plane parallel inviscid flow. Phys. Fluids 7 (4), 557–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z., Wang, S. & Whiting, S. H. 1998 The evolution of a perturbed vortex in a pipe to axisymmetric vortex breakdown. J. Fluid. Mech. 366, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shiriaeva, E. V., Vladimirov, V. A. & Zhukov, M. Yu. 2009 Theory of rotating electrohydrodynamic flows in a liquid film. Phys. Rev. E 80 (4), 041603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shnirelman, A. I. 1993 Lattice theory and flows of ideal incompressible fluid. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 1, 105–113.Google Scholar
Stein, E. M. 1986 Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 30. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, E. M. & Weiss, G. 1971 Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidian Spaces. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 32. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stremler, M. A. & Aref, H. 1999 Motion of three point vortices in a periodic parallelogram. J. Fluid Mech. 392, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1966 Double boundary layers in oscillatory viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 24, 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1971 Stability problems in fluids. In Mathematical Problems in Geophysical Science, Lecture Notes in Applied Math. Series (ed. Reid, W. H.), vol. 13, pp. 139–145. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
Swaters, G. E. 2000 Introduction to Hamiltonian Fluid Dynamics and Stability Theory. Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Temam, R. & Wang, X. M. 2002 Boundary layers associated with incompressible Navier–Stokes equations: the noncharacteristic boundary case. J. Differ. Equ. 179 (2), 647–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, E. C. & Rebollo, T. C. 2001 On cubic spline approximations for the vortex patch problem. Appl. Numer. Math. 36, 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villat, H. 1930 Lecons sur la theorie des tourbillons. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 1978 Stability of a tornado type flow. Dyn. Continuous Media 37, 50–62, Lavrentyev Institute for Hydrodynamics Press, Novosibirsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 1979 Stability of ideal incompressible flows with circular streamlines. Dyn. Continuous Media 42, 103–109. Lavrentyev Institute for Hydrodynamics Press, Novosibirsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 1987 Application of conservation laws for obtaining conditions of stability for steady flows of an ideal fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 28 (3), 351–358 (translated from Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 1988 Stability of the flows with discontinuities in vorticity field. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 29 (1), 77–83 (translated from Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 2005 Vibrodynamics of pendulum and submerged solid. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 7, S397–S412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. 2008 Viscous flows in a half space caused by tangential vibrations on its boundary. Stud. Appl. Math. 121 (4), 337–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. & Moffatt, H. K. 1995 On general transformations and variational principles for the magnetohydrodynamics of ideal fluids. Part I. Fundamental principles. J. Fluid Mech. 283, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A., Moffatt, H. K. & Ilin, K. I. 1996 On general transformations and variational principles for the magnetohydrodynamics of ideal fluids. Part II. Stability criteria, for two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 329, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirov, V. A. & Tarasov, V. F. 1980 Formation of a system of vortex filaments in a rotating liquid. Fluid Dyn. 15 (1), 34–40 (translated from Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1997 The dynamics of a swirling flow in a pipe and transition to axisymmetric vortex breakdown. J. Fluid. Mech. 340, 177–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Q. 2004 Bounds on convective heat transport in a rotating porous layer. Mech. Res. Commun. 31 (3), 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yudovich, V. 1963 Flows of an inviscid incompressible liquid through a given domain. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 7, 789–791 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1989 Linearization Method in Hydrodynamical Stability Theory. AMS Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 74. American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1995 Secondary cycle of equilibria in a system with cosymmetry, its creation by bifurcation and impossibility of symmetric treatment of it. Chaos 5 (2), 402–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar