Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T23:14:22.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle-driven gravity currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Roger T. Bonnecaze ,
Herbert E. Huppert  and
John R. Lister
Roger T. Bonnecaze
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK Current address: Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin. Austin, Texas, 78712-1062, USA.
Herbert E. Huppert
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
John R. Lister
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gravity currents created by the release of a fixed volume of a suspension into a lighter ambient fluid are studied theoretically and experimentally. The greater density of the current and the buoyancy force driving its motion arise primarily from dense particles suspended in the interstitial fluid of the current. The dynamics of the current are assumed to be dominated by a balance between inertial and buoyancy forces; viscous forces are assumed negligible. The currents considered are two-dimensional and flow over a rigid horizontal surface. The flow is modelled by either the single- or the two-layer shallow-water equations, the two-layer equations being necessary to include the effects of the overlying fluid, which are important when the depth of the current is comparable to the depth of the overlying fluid. Because the local density of the gravity current depends on the concentration of particles, the buoyancy contribution to the momentum balance depends on the variation of the particle concentration. A transport equation for the particle concentration is derived by assuming that the particles are vertically well-mixed by the turbulence in the current, are advected by the mean flow and settle out through the viscous sublayer at the bottom of the current. The boundary condition at the moving front of the current relates the velocity and the pressure head at that point. The resulting equations are solved numerically, which reveals that two types of shock can occur in the current. In the late stages of all particle-driven gravity currents, an internal bore develops that separates a particle-free jet-like flow in the rear from a dense gravity-current flow near the front. The second type of bore occurs if the initial height of the current is comparable to the depth of the ambient fluid. This bore develops during the early lock-exchange flow between the two fluids and strongly changes the structure of the current and its transport of particles from those of a current in very deep surroundings. To test the theory, several experiments were performed to measure the length of particle-driven gravity currents as a function of time and their deposition patterns for a variety of particle sizes and initial masses of sediment. The comparison between the theoretical predictions, which have no adjustable parameters, and the experimental results are very good.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 250 , May 1993 , pp. 339 - 369
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, M. B. & Basco, D. R. 1989 Computational Fluid Dynamics. Longman Scientific & Technical.
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 223–240.Google Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 1993 Axisymmetric particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. (to be submitted.)Google Scholar
Chen, J. C. 1980 Studies on gravitational spreading currents. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Einstein, H. A. 1968 Deposition of suspended particles in a gravel bed. J. Hydraul. Div., ASCE 94, 1197–1205.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. H. & Turner, J. S. 1959 Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423–447.Google Scholar
Fannelop, T. K. & Waldman, G. D. 1972 Dynamics of oil slicks. AIAA J. 10, 506–510.Google Scholar
Grundy, R. E. & Rottman, J. W. 1986 Self-similar solutions of the shallow-water equations representing gravity currents with variable inflow. J. Fluid Mech. 169, 337–351.Google Scholar
Hallworth, M. A., Phillips, J., Huppert, H. E. & Sparks, R. S. J. 1993 Entrainment in turbulent gravity currents. Nature (sub judice.)Google Scholar
Hoult, D. P. 1972 Oil spreading on the sea. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 341–368.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1982 The propagation of two-dimensional and axisymmetric viscous gravity currents over a rigid horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 43–58.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Simpson, J. E. 1980 The slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785–799.Google Scholar
Inman, D. L., Nordstrom, C. E. & Flick, R. E. 1976 Currents in submarine canyons: an air–sea–land interaction. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 275–310.Google Scholar
Kármán, T. von 1940 The engineer grapples with nonlinear problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 615–683.Google Scholar
Martin, D. & Nokes, R. 1988 Crystal settling in a vigorously convecting magma chamber. Nature 332, 534–536.Google Scholar
Martin, D. & Nokes, R. 1989 A fluid-dynamical study of crystal settling in convecting magmas. J. Petrol. 30, 1471–1500.Google Scholar
McCave, I. N. 1970 Deposition of fine grained suspended sediment from tidal currents. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4151–4159.Google Scholar
Parker, G., Fukushima, T. & Pantin, H. M. 1986 Self-accelerating turbidity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 145–181.Google Scholar
Perrodon, A. 1985 Dynamics of oil and gas accumulation. Bulletin des Centres de RecherchesExploration-Production, Elf-Aquitaine, Pau, France, pp. 98–105.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teuklosky, S. A. & Vetterling, W. T. 1986 Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press.
Roache, P. J. 1972 Computational Fluid Dynamics. Hermosa.
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1983 The initial development of gravity currents from fixed-volume releases of heavy fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. S. J., Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E., Lister, J. R., Hallworth, M. A., Mader, H. & Phillips, J. 1993 Sediment-laden gravity currents with reversing buoyancy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 114, 243–257.Google Scholar
Wright, L. D., Wiseman, W. J., Yang, Z. S., Bornhold, B. D., Keller, G. H., Prior, D. B. & Suhayda, J. N. 1990 Processes of marine dispersal and deposition of suspended silts off the modern mouth of the Juanghe (Yellow River). Contntl Shelf Res. 10, 1–40.Google Scholar