Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:04:35.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Bragg resonances and wave triad interactions in two-layered shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Raunak Raj
Affiliation:
Environmental and Geophysical Fluids Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, U.P. 208016, India
Anirban Guha*
Affiliation:
Environmental and Geophysical Fluids Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, U.P. 208016, India
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The standard resonance conditions for Bragg scattering as well as weakly nonlinear wave triads have been traditionally derived in the absence of any background velocity. In this paper, we have studied how these resonance conditions get modified when uniform, as well as various piecewise linear velocity profiles, are considered for two-layered shear flows. Background velocity can influence the resonance conditions in two ways: (i) by causing Doppler shifts, and (ii) by changing the intrinsic frequencies of the waves. For Bragg resonance, even a uniform velocity field changes the resonance condition. Velocity shear strongly influences the resonance conditions since, in addition to changing the intrinsic frequencies, it can cause unequal Doppler shifts between the surface, pycnocline and the bottom. Using multiple scale analysis and Fredholm alternative, we analytically obtain the equations governing both the Bragg resonance and the wave triads. We have also extended the higher-order spectral method, a highly efficient computational tool usually used to study triad and Bragg resonance problems, to incorporate the effect of piecewise linear velocity profile. A significant aspect, both on the theoretical and numerical fronts, has been extending the potential flow approximation, which is the basis of the study of these kinds of problems, to incorporate piecewise constant background shear.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M.-R. 2012 Broadband cloaking in stratified seas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (8), 084502.Google Scholar
Alam, M.-R., Liu, Y. & Yue, D. K. P. 2009a Bragg resonance of waves in a two-layer fluid propagating over bottom ripples. Part I. Perturbation analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 624, 191224.Google Scholar
Alam, M.-R., Liu, Y. & Yue, D. K. P. 2009b Bragg resonance of waves in a two-layer fluid propagating over bottom ripples. Part II. Numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 624, 225253.Google Scholar
Baker, G. R., Meiron, D. I. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Generalized vortex methods for free-surface flow problems. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 477501.Google Scholar
Ball, F. K. 1964 Energy transfer between external and internal gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 465478.Google Scholar
Cairns, R. A. 1979 The role of negative energy waves in some instabilities of parallel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 92, 114.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1988 Wave Interactions and Fluid Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A .G. 1982 The reflection of wave energy by undulations on the seabed. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 6 (4), 207232.Google Scholar
Dommermuth, D. G. & Yue, D. K. P. 1987 A high-order spectral method for the study of nonlinear gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 267288.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. 2002 Introduction to Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drivas, T. D. & Wunsch, S. 2016 Triad resonance between gravity and vorticity waves in vertical shear. Ocean Model. 103, 8797.Google Scholar
Elgar, S., Raubenheimer, B. & Herbers, T. H. C. 2003 Bragg reflection of ocean waves from sandbars. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (1), 1016.Google Scholar
Geyer, W. R., Ralston, D. K. & Holleman, R. C. 2017 Hydraulics and mixing in a laterally divergent channel of a highly stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res. 122 (6), 47434760.Google Scholar
Guha, A. & Lawrence, G. A. 2014 A wave interaction approach to studying non-modal homogeneous and stratified shear instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 755, 336364.Google Scholar
Guha, A. & Raj, R. 2018 On the inertial effects of density variation in stratified shear flows. Phys. Fluids 30, 126603.Google Scholar
Harnik, N., Heifetz, E., Umurhan, O. M. & Lott, F. 2008 A buoyancy–vorticity wave interaction approach to stratified shear flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 65 (8), 26152630.Google Scholar
Heathershaw, A. D. & Davies, A. G. 1985 Resonant wave reflection by transverse bedforms and its relation to beaches and offshore bars. Mar. Geol. 62 (3–4), 321338.Google Scholar
Hill, D. F. & Foda, M. A. 1996 Subharmonic resonance of short internal standing waves by progressive surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 321, 217233.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. 1986 A general wave equation for waves over rippled beds. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 171186.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. 1988 Current effects on resonant reflection of surface water waves by sand bars. J. Fluid Mech. 186, 501520.Google Scholar
McHugh, J. P. 1992 The stability of capillary-gravity waves on flow over a wavy bottom. Wave Motion 16 (1), 2331.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1985 Resonant reflection of surface water waves by periodic sandbars. J. Fluid Mech. 152, 315335.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1976 Interaction of water waves and currents. Adv. Appl. Maths. 16, 9117.Google Scholar
Raj, R. & Guha, A.2018 Explosive instability due to flow over a rippled bottom. Preprint, arXiv:1809.07507.Google Scholar
Shete, M. H. & Guha, A. 2018 Effect of free surface on submerged stratified shear instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 843, 98125.Google Scholar
Vallis, G. K. 2017 Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, F. 1995 Resonant generation of internal waves on the soft sea bed by a surface water wave. Phys. Fluids 7, 19151922.Google Scholar