Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:37:07.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical solutions for the time-dependent viscous flow between two rotating coaxial disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

Carl E. Pearson*
Affiliation:
Sperry Rand Research Center, Sudbury, Massachusetts

Extract

The nature of the steady-state viscous flow between two large rotating disks has often been discussed, usually qualitatively, in the literature. Using a version of the numerical method described in the preceding paper (Pearson 1965), digital computer solutions for the time-dependent case are obtained (steady-state solutions are then obtainable as limiting cases for large times). Solutions are given for impulsively started disks, and for counter-rotating disks. Of interest is the fact that, at high Reynolds numbers, the solution for the latter problem is unsymmetrical; moreover, the main body of the fluid rotates at a higher angular velocity than that of either disk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1951 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 4, 29.Google Scholar
Benney, D. 1964 Sperry Rand Res. Center Rep. RR-64-6, January.Google Scholar
Boedewadt, U. T. 1940 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 20, 241.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1934 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 30, 365.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Howard, L. N. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 17, 385.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Weinbaum, S. 1964 Sperry Rand Res. Center Rep. July.Google Scholar
Kármán, T. V. 1921 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 1, 244.Google Scholar
Pearson, C. 1964 Sperry Rand Res. Center Rep. RR-64-29.Google Scholar
Pearson, C. E. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 21, 611.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1953 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49, 333.Google Scholar