Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:44:13.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical simulation of electrospraying in the cone-jet mode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

M. Gamero-Castaño Open the ORCID record for M. Gamero-Castaño [Opens in a new window]  and
M. Magnani
M. Gamero-Castaño*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
M. Magnani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article solves numerically the equations of the leaky-dielectric model applied to cone jets. The solution is a function of the properties of the fluid and its flow rate, universal in that it does not depend on the geometry and potential of the electrodes. This is made possible by the use of the potential field generated by a semi-infinite Taylor cone as a far-field boundary condition. The numerical solution yields the current emitted by the electrospray, which compares well with experimental data, and detailed information about the velocity, surface charge, electric field and the position of the free surface. These characteristics are generally inaccessible through experiments, and are needed to understand the relative importance of competing processes and the dominant physics. The simulations investigate the liquids tributyl phosphate and propylene carbonate (dielectric constants of 8.91 and 64.9 respectively), in a wide range of electrical conductivities and flow rates. The simulations show that the position of the surface, expressed in units of the characteristic length $r_{c}$, is largely invariant regardless of the physical properties and flow rates of the liquids. The surface charge falls below its equilibrium value along the transition from cone to jet, with a deficit that increases with the ratio between the electrical relaxation and flow residence times. Several characteristics of the cone jet are functions of the dielectric constant, which is consistent with the importance of charge relaxation effects (i.e. with the absence of surface charge equilibrium). The electric energy transferred to the transition region is largely transformed into viscous and ohmic dissipation, and conversion into kinetic energy only dominates once most of the current is fixed on the surface.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Aerosols/atomization Drops and Bubbles: Electrohydrodynamic effects Interfacial Flows (free surface): Interfacial Flows (free surface)
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 859 , 25 January 2019 , pp. 247 - 267
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakr, A. A. 1986 The Boundary Integral Equation Method in Axisymmetric Stress Analysis Problems, Lecture Notes in Engineering, chap. II. Springer.Google Scholar
Borrajo-Pelaez, R., Saiz, F. & Gamero Castaño, M. 2015 The effect of the molecular mass on the sputtering of Si, SiC, Ge, and GaAs by electrosprayed nanodroplets at impact velocities up to 17 km s-1 . Aerosol Sci. Technol. 49, 256–266.Google Scholar
Cloupeau, M. & Prunet-Foch, B. 1989 Electrostatic spraying of liquids in cone-jet mode. J. Electrostat. 22, 135–159.Google Scholar
Cloupeau, M. & Prunet-Foch, B. 1990 Electrostatic spraying of liquids. Main functioning modes. J. Electrostat. 25, 165–184.Google Scholar
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. K. & Whitehouse, C. M. 1989 Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246, 64–71.Google Scholar
Fernández de la Mora, J. 2007 The fluid dynamics of Taylor cones. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 217–243.Google Scholar
Fernández de la Mora, J. & Loscertales, I. G. 1994 The current transmitted through an electrified conical meniscus. J. Fluid Mech. 260, 155–184.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. A. J. 1988 Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, Springer Series in Computational Physics, chap. XII-XIII. Springer.Google Scholar
Gamero-Castaño, M. 2010 Energy dissipation in electrosprays and the geometric scaling of the transition region of cone-jets. J. Fluid Mech. 662, 493–513.Google Scholar
Gamero-Castaño, M. & Hruby, V. 2002 Electric measurements of charged sprays emitted by cone-jets. J. Fluid Mech. 459, 245–276.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M. 1997 Cone-jet analytical extension of Taylor’s electrostatic solution and the asymptotic universal scaling laws in electrospraying. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 217–220.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M. 2004 On the general scaling theory for electrospraying. J. Fluid Mech. 507, 203–212.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M., Dávila, J. & Barrero, A. 1997 Current and droplet size in the electrospraying of liquids. Scaling laws. J. Aerosol. Sci. 28, 249–275.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M., López-Herrera, J. M., Herrada, M. A., Ramos, A. & Montanero, J. M. 2018 Review on the physics of electrospray: from electrokinetics to the operating conditions of single and coaxial Taylor cone-jets, and AC electrospray. J. Aerosol. Sci. 125, 32–56.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M. & Montanero, J. M. 2009 Revision of capillary cone-jet physics: electrospray and flow focusing. Phys. Rev. E 79, 066305.Google Scholar
Gañán-Calvo, A. M., Rebollo-Muñoz, N. & Montanero, J. M. 2013 The minimum or natural rate of flow and droplet size ejected by Taylor cone-jets: physical symmetries and scaling laws. New J. Phys. 15, 033035.Google Scholar
Grustan-Gutierrez, E. & Gamero-Castaño, M. 2017 Microfabricated electrospray thruster array with high hydraulic resistance channels. J. Propul. Power 33, 984–991.Google Scholar
Herrada, M. A., López-Herrera, J. M., Gañán-Calvo, A. M., Vega, E. J., Montanero, J. M. & Popinet, S. 2012 Numerical simulation of electrospray in the cone-jet mode. Phys. Rev. E 86, 026305.Google Scholar
Higuera, F. J. 2003 Flow rate and electric current emitted by a Taylor cone. J. Fluid Mech. 484, 303–327.Google Scholar
Loscertales, I. G., Barrero, A., Guerrero, I., Cortijo, R., Marquez, M. & Gañán-Calvo, A. M. 2002 Micro/nano encapsulation via electrified coaxial liquid jets. Science 295, 1695–1698.Google Scholar
Melcher, J. R. & Taylor, G. I. 1969 Electrohydrodynamics: a review of the role of interfacial shear stresses. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 111–146.Google Scholar
Saville, D. A. 1997 Electrohydrodynamics: the Taylor–Melcher leaky dielectric model. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 27–64.Google Scholar
Sun, D., Chang, C., Li, S. & Lin, L. 2006 Near-field electrospinning. Nano Lett. 6, 839–842.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1964 Disintegration of water drops in an electric field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280, 383–397.Google Scholar