Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:10:11.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear stability of a stratified shear flow in the regime with an unsteady critical layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

S. M. Churilov
Affiliation:
Siberian Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (SibIZMIR), USSR Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk 33, P.O. Box 4, 664033 USSR
I. G. Shukhman
Affiliation:
Siberian Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (SibIZMIR), USSR Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk 33, P.O. Box 4, 664033 USSR

Abstract

In a previous paper (Churilov & Shukhman 1987a) we investigated the nonlinear development of disturbances to a weakly supercritical, stratified shear flow; we now report a continuation of that study. The degree of supercriticality of the flow is assumed not too small so that — unlike Paper 1 — the critical layer that appears in the region of resonance of the wave with the flow is an unsteady rather than viscous one. The evolution equation with cubic and quintic nonlinearity has been derived. The nonlinear term is non-local in time, i.e. depends on the entire preceding development of the disturbance. This equation has been used in the analysis of the evolution of an initially small disturbance. It is shown that where wave amplitude A is small enough (A [Lt ] ν½, ν is the inverse of the Reynolds number), cubic nonlinearity dominates. In this case, as in Paper 1, the character of the evolution essentially depends on the sign of the quantity (η − 1), where η is the Prandtl number. However, independently of this sign the disturbance reaches — as it increases — the level AO½) and then quintic nonlinearity becomes dominant. At this stage an ‘explosive’ regime occurs and amplitude grows as $A \sim (t_0 - t)^{-\frac{7}{4}}$. The results obtained, together with the findings of Paper 1, provide a full description of the development of small disturbances at a large (but finite) Reynolds number in different regimes which are determined by the degree of flow's supercriticality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Natl. Bureau of Standards.
Brown, S. N., Rosen, A. S. & Maslowe, S. A. 1981 The evolution of a quasi-steady layer in a stratified viscous shear layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 375, 271.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1978 The evolution of a small inviscid disturbance to a marginally unstable stratified shear flow: stage two. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 363, 175.Google Scholar
Churilov, S. M. & Shukhman, I. G. 1987a Nonlinear stability of a stratified shear flow: viscous critical layer. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 1 (Paper 1).Google Scholar
Churilov, S. M. & Shukhman, I. G. 1987b Nonlinear development of disturbances in a zonal shear flow. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 38, 145.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. 1958 The stability of a shear layer in an unbounded heterogeneous inviscid fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 214.Google Scholar
Erdélyi, A. 1953 Higher Transcendental Functions, vol 1. McGraw-Hill.
Hickernell, F. J. 1984 Time-dependent critical layers in shear flows on beta-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 431.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.
Supplementary material: PDF

Churilov and Shukhman supplementary material

Supplementary Appendix B

Download Churilov and Shukhman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 684.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Churilov and Shukhman supplementary material

Supplementary Appendix B

Download Churilov and Shukhman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 926.2 KB