Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T14:44:44.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motion planning and trajectory tracking for three-dimensional Poiseuille flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2009

JENNIE COCHRAN  and
MIROSLAV KRSTIC
JENNIE COCHRAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
MIROSLAV KRSTIC
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
*
†E-mail address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present the first solution to a boundary motion planning problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, linearized around the parabolic equilibrium in a three-dimensional channel flow. The pressure and skin friction at one wall are chosen as the reference outputs as they are the most readily measurable ‘wall-restricted’ quantities in experimental fluid dynamics and also because they play a special role as performance metrics in aerodynamics. The reference velocity input is applied at the opposite wall. We find the exact (method independent) solution to the motion planning problem using the PDE (partial differential equation) backstepping theory. The motion planning solution results in open-loop controls, which produce the reference output trajectories only under special initial conditions for the flow velocity field. To achieve convergence to the reference trajectory from other (nearby) initial conditions, we design a feedback controller. We also present a detailed examination of the closed-form solutions for gains and the behaviour of the motion planning solution as the wavenumbers grow or the Reynolds number grows. Numerical results are shown for the motion planning problem.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 626 , 10 May 2009 , pp. 307 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aamo, O.-M. & Krstic, M. 2002 Flow Control by Feedback: Stabilization and Mixing. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Aamo, O.-M. & Krstic, M. 2004 Feedback control of particle dispersion in bluff body wakes. Intl J. Control 77, 1001–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ablowitz, M. J., Kruskal, M. D. & Ladik, J. F. 1979 Solitary wave collisions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 36, 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. & Christofides, P. D. 2002 Drag reduction in transitional linearized channel flow using distributed control. Intl J. Control 75 (15), 1213–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, A., Liu, W.-J. & Krstic, M. 2001 Stability enhancement by boundary control in 2D channel flow. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 46, 1696–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamieh, B. & Dahleh, M. 2001 Energy amplification in channel flows using stochastic exictation. Phys. Fluids 13 (11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baramov, L., Tutty, O. R. & Rogers, E. 2002 Robust control of linearized Poiseuille flow. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 25 (1), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baramov, L., Tutty, O. R. & Rogers, E. 2004 H∞ control of nonperiodic two-dimensional channel flow. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12 (1), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbu, V. 2003 Feedback stabilization of Navier–Stokes equations. ESAIM: Control, Optim. Cal. Var. 9, 197–205.Google Scholar
Bewley, T. R. 2001 Flow control: new challenges for a new renaissance. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 37, 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T. R. & Liu, S. 1998 Optimal and robust control and estimation of linear paths to transition. J. Fluid Mech. 365, 305–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glezer, A. & Allen, M. 2002 Micromachined synthetic jet actuators and applications thereof. U.S. Patent 5758823.Google Scholar
Gunzburger, M. D. & Lee, H. C. 1991 Feedback control of karman vortex shedding. J. Appl. Mech. 63 (3), 828–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogberg, M., Bewley, T. R. & Henningson, D. S. 2003 Linear feedback control and estimation of transition in plane channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 481, 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilak, M. & Rowley, C. W. 2008 Modeling of transitional channel flow using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Phys. Fluids 20, 034103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isidori, A. 1995 Nonlinear Control Systems. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, S. S., Speyer, J. L. & Kim, J. 1997 A systems theory approach to the feedback stabilization of infinitesimal and finite-amplitude disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 332, 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, M. & Bamieh, B. 2005 Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 534, 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krstic, M., Cochran, J. & Vazquez, R. 2008 Backstepping controllers for stabilization of turbulent flow pdes. In Modeling and Control of Complex Systems (ed. Ioannou, P. & Pitsilides, I.). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Krstic, M., Kanellakopoulos, I. & Kokotovic, P. 1995 Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Laroche, B. & Martin, P. 2000 Motion planning for a 1-D diffusion equation using a Brunovsky-like decomposition. In 14th International Symposium of Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems. Perpignan, France.Google Scholar
Laroche, B., Martin, P. & Rouchon, P. 2000 Motion planning for the heat equation. Intl J. Robust Nonlinear Control 10, 629–644.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurer, T. & Zeitz, M. 2005 Feedforward and feedback tracking control of nonlinear diffusion – convection – reaction systems using summability methods. Indust. Engng Chem. Res. 44 (8), 2532–2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollivier, F. & Sedoglavic, A. 2001 A generalization of flatness to nonlinear systems of partial differential equations. Application to the command of a flexible rod. In 5th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems. St Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Protas, B. & Styczek, A. 2002 Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime. Phys. Fluids 14, 2073–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, J.-P. 2006 Feedback boundary stabilization of the two dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. on Control Optim. 45, 790–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouchon, P. 2001 Motion planning, equivalence, infinite dimensional systems. Intl J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 11 (1), 165–188.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyshlyaev, A. & Krstic, M. 2004 Closed-form boundary state feedback for a class of 1-D partial integro-differential equations. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 49, 2185–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, R., Coron, J. M. & Trelat, E. 2006 a Stable Poiseuille flow transfer for a Navier-Stokes system. In 25th American Control Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, R. & Krstic, M. 2007 a A closed-form feedback controller for stabilization of the linearized 2D Navier–Stokes Poisseuille flow. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52 (12), 2298–2312. Minneapolis, MN, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, R. & Krstic, M. 2007 b Control of Turbulent and Magnetohydrodynamic Channel Flows. Birkhauser. San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Vazquez, R., Schuster, E. & Krstic, M. 2006 b A closed-form observer for the 3D inductionless MHD and Navier-Stokes channel flow. In 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 739–746.Google Scholar
Veres, S. M., Baramov, L., Tutty, O. R. & Rogers, E. 2003 Iterative design for active control of fluid flow. Intl J. Control 76 (14), 1375–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C. C., Krstic, M. & Bewley, T. 2004 Active control of jet mixing. IEE Proc.: Control Theory Appl. 151, 763–772.Google Scholar