Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:17:05.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal regulation in compressible turbulent shear layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

K. Matsuno Open the ORCID record for K. Matsuno [Opens in a new window]  and
S. K. Lele
K. Matsuno
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305, USA
S. K. Lele*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305, USA Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

High-resolution simulations of temporally evolving mixing layers, for convective Mach numbers ranging from $M_c=0.2$ to $M_c=2.0$ with density ratios $s=1$ and $s=7$, are analysed to characterize compressibility effects on the structure and evolution of turbulence in this compressible flow. Published experimental results are used to validate simulation results. Examination of the turbulence scales in the present data suggests an internal regulation mechanism. Correlated eddying motions were found to be in support of a ‘sonic eddy hypothesis’. Eddy scales in all spatial directions are found to be a progressively smaller fraction of the overall mixing-layer thickness with increasing $M_c$, forming independent layers of eddying motions at high $M_c$. These reduced spatial scales serve to reduce the effective velocity scale for turbulent motions, suppressed Reynolds stresses, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) production and dissipation, and the mixing-layer thickness growth rate.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Shear layer turbulence Turbulent Flows: Compressible turbulence Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation
Type
JFM Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 907 , 25 January 2021 , R2
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adumitroaie, V., Ristorcelli, J. & Taulbee, D. 1999 Progress in Favre–Reynolds stress closures for compressible flows. Phys. Fluids 11 (9), 2696–2719.Google Scholar
Almagro, A., García-Villalba, M. & Flores, O. 2017 A numerical study of a variable-density low-speed turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 830, 569–601.Google Scholar
Andrews, M. 2011 Workshop: research needs for material mixing at extremes. Tech. Rep. LA-UR-11-02565. Los Alamos National Lab.Google Scholar
Arun, S., Sameen, A., Srinivasan, B., & Girimaji, S. S. 2019 Topology-based characterization of compressibility effects in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 874, 38–75.Google Scholar
Aupoix, B. 2004 Modelling of compressibility effects in mixing layers. J. Turbul. 5 (7), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzer, J. & Livescu, D. 2020 Variable-density effects in incompressible non-buoyant shear-drived turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 900, A16.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1977 Compressible turbulent shear layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9 (1), 33–52.Google Scholar
Breidenthal, R. 1992 Sonic eddy-a model for compressible turbulence. AIAA J. 30 (1), 101–104.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64 (4), 775–816.Google Scholar
Buchta, D., Anderson, A. & Freund, J. 2014 Near-field shocks radiated by high-speed free-shear-flow turbulence. In 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2014–3201.Google Scholar
Buchta, D. & Freund, J. 2017 The near-field pressure radiated by planar high-speed free-shear-flow turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 832, 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, R. & Dutton, J. 1990 Numerical modeling of compressible reacting turbulent shear layers. In 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAA Paper 90–1463.Google Scholar
Cambon, C., Coleman, G. & Mansour, N. 1993 Rapid distortion analysis and direct simulation of compressible homogeneous turbulence at finite mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 257, 641–665.Google Scholar
Clemens, N. & Mungal, M. 1995 Large-scale structure and entrainment in the supersonic mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 284, 171–216.Google Scholar
Day, M., Reynolds, W. & Mansour, N. 1998 The structure of the compressible reacting mixing layer: insights from linear stability analysis. Phys. Fluids 10 (4), 993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimotakis, P. 1991 Turbulent free shear layer mixing and combustion. In High Speed Flight Propulsion Systems, vol. 137, pp. 265–340.Google Scholar
Freund, J., Lele, S. & Moin, P. 2000 Compressibility effects in a turbulent annular mixing layer. Part 1. Turbulence and growth rate. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 229–267.Google Scholar
Gomez, C. & Girimaji, S. 2013 Toward second-moment closure modelling of compressible shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 733, 325–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, C. & Girimaji, S. 2014 Explicit algebraic reynolds stress model (earsm) for compressible shear flows. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 28 (2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, S. 2014 Reynolds and mach number scaling in stationary compressible turbulence using massively parallel high resolution direct numerical simulations. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Jahanbakhshi, R. & Madnia, C. 2016 Entrainment in a compressible turbulent shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 797, 564–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanbakhshi, R. & Madnia, C. 2018 Viscous superlayer in a reacting compressible turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 848, 743–755.Google Scholar
Kim, S. 1990 New mixing-length model for supersonic shear layers. AIAA J. 28 (11), 1999–2000.Google Scholar
Kleinman, R. & Freund, J. 2008 The sound from mixing layers simulated with different ranges of turbulence scales. Phys. Fluids 20 (10), 101503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. 1989 Direct numerical simulation of compressible free shear flows. In 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 89–0374.Google Scholar
Lele, S. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1), 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuno, K. & Lele, S. 2020 Compressibility effects in high speed turbulent shear layers–revisited. In AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, AIAA Paper 2020–0573.Google Scholar
Pantano, C. & Sarkar, S. 2002 A study of compressibility effects in the high-speed turbulent shear layer using direct simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 451, 329–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papamoschou, D. & Lele, S. 1993 Vortex-induced disturbance field in a compressible shear layer. Phys. Fluids A 5 (6), 1412–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papamoschou, D. & Roshko, A. 1988 The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planché, O. & Reynolds, W. 1992 Heat release effects on mixing in supersonic reacting free shear-layers. In 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 92–0092.Google Scholar
Rossmann, T., Mungal, M. & Hanson, R. 2001 Evolution and growth of large scale structures in high compressibility mixing layers. J. Turbul. 3, N9.Google Scholar
Sandham, N. D. & Reynolds, W. C. 1991 Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S. 1995 The stabilizing effect of compressibility in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 282, 163–186.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, A. 2018 Simulations of shock induced interfacial instabilities including materials with strength. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Vaghefi, S. J. 2014 Simulation and Modeling of Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer. State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Vreman, A., Sandham, N. & Luo, K. 1996 Compressible mixing layer growth rate and turbulence characteristics. J. Fluid Mech. 320, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar