Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:24:26.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2009

N. HUTCHINS ,
T. B. NICKELS ,
I. MARUSIC  and
M. S. CHONG
N. HUTCHINS*
Affiliation:
Walter Bassett Aerodynamics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
T. B. NICKELS
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
I. MARUSIC
Affiliation:
Walter Bassett Aerodynamics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
M. S. CHONG
Affiliation:
Walter Bassett Aerodynamics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Careful reassessment of new and pre-existing data shows that recorded scatter in the hot-wire-measured near-wall peak in viscous-scaled streamwise turbulence intensity is due in large part to the simultaneous competing effects of the Reynolds number and viscous-scaled wire length l+. An empirical expression is given to account for these effects. These competing factors can explain much of the disparity in existing literature, in particular explaining how previous studies have incorrectly concluded that the inner-scaled near-wall peak is independent of the Reynolds number. We also investigate the appearance of the so-called outer peak in the broadband streamwise intensity, found by some researchers to occur within the log region of high-Reynolds-number boundary layers. We show that the ‘outer peak’ is consistent with the attenuation of small scales due to large l+. For turbulent boundary layers, in the absence of spatial resolution problems, there is no outer peak up to the Reynolds numbers investigated here (Reτ = 18830). Beyond these Reynolds numbers – and for internal geometries – the existence of such peaks remains open to debate. Fully mapped energy spectra, obtained with a range of l+, are used to demonstrate this phenomenon. We also establish the basis for a ‘maximum flow frequency’, a minimum time scale that the full experimental system must be capable of resolving, in order to ensure that the energetic scales are not attenuated. It is shown that where this criterion is not met (in this instance due to insufficient anemometer/probe response), an outer peak can be reproduced in the streamwise intensity even in the absence of spatial resolution problems. It is also shown that attenuation due to wire length can erode the region of the streamwise energy spectra in which we would normally expect to see kx−1 scaling. In doing so, we are able to rationalize much of the disparity in pre-existing literature over the kx−1 region of self-similarity. Not surprisingly, the attenuated spectra also indicate that Kolmogorov-scaled spectra are subject to substantial errors due to wire spatial resolution issues. These errors persist to wavelengths far beyond those which we might otherwise assume from simple isotropic assumptions of small-scale motions. The effects of hot-wire length-to-diameter ratio (l/d) are also briefly investigated. For the moderate wire Reynolds numbers investigated here, reducing l/d from 200 to 100 has a detrimental effect on measured turbulent fluctuations at a wide range of energetic scales, affecting both the broadband intensity and the energy spectra.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 635 , 25 September 2009 , pp. 103 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, H., Kawamura, H. & Choi, H. 2004 Very large-scale structures and their effects on the wall shear-stress fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow up to Re τ = 640. J. Fluids Engng 126, 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreopoulos, J., Durst, F., Zaric, Z. & Jovanović, J. 1984 Influence of Reynolds number on characteristics of turbulent wall boundary layers. Exp. Fluids 2, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. C. C., Hultmark, M., Smits, A. J. & Schultz, M. P. 2008 Azimuthal structure of turbulence in high Reynolds number pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balint, J.-L., Wallace, J. M. & Vukoslavčević, P. 1991 The velocity and vorticity vector fields of a turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Statistical properties. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 53–86.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. J. & Hollingsworth, D. K. 2003 Heat transfer in turbulent boundary layers subjected to free-stream turbulence. Part 1. Experimental results. J. Turbomach. 125, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, J. C., Durst, F. & Jovanović, J. 1982 Corrections of hot-wire anemometer measurements near walls. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, F. H., Sleicher, C. A. & Wehrmann, O. H. 1967 Turbulence measurements with inclined hotwires. Part 1. Heat transfer experiments with inclined hot-wires. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimbala, J. M. & Park, W. J. 1990 A direct hot-wire calibration technique to account for ambient temperature drift in incompressible flow. Exp. Fluids 8 (5), 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. 1976 Hot-wire anemometry. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durst, F., Fischer, M., Jovanović, J. & Kikura, H. 1998 Methods to set up and investigate low Reynolds nuymber, fully developed turbulent plane channel flows. J. Fluids Engng 120, 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durst, F., Noppenberger, S., Still, M. & Venzke, H. 1996 Influence of humidity on hot-wire measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7, 1517–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erm, L. P. & Joubert, P. N. 1991 Low-reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernholz, H. H., Krausse, E., Nockermann, M. & Schober, M. 1995 Comparative measurements in the canonical boundary layer at Reδ2 ≤ 6 × 104 on the wall of the German-Dutch windtunnel. Phys. Fluids 7 (6), 1275–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernholz, H. H. & Warnack, D. 1998 The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. The turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 359, 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freymuth, P. 1977 a Frequency response and electronic testing for constant-temperature hot-wire anemometers. J. Phys. E 10 (7), 705–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freymuth, P. 1977 b Further investigation of the nonlinear theory for constant-temperature hot-wire anemometers. J. Phys. E 10 (7), 710–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2006 Large-scale motions in a supersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, M., Hommema, S. E. & Adrian, R. J. 2006 Large-scale and very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. E. & Bradshaw, P. 1989 Turbulence structure of a boundary layer beneath a turbulent free stream. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hites, M. H. 1997 Scaling of high-Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers in the National Diagnostic Facility. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N., Ganapathisubramani, B. & Marusic, I. 2004 Dominant spanwise Fourier modes, and the existence of very large scale coherence in turbulent boundary layers. In Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 a Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 b Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 647–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwamoto, K., Suzuki, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Reynolds number effect on wall turbulence: toward effective feedback control. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, A. V. & Alfredsson, P. H. 1983 Effects of imperfect spatial resolution on measurements of wall-bounded turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, F. E. 1996 The computer-controlled constant-temperature anemometer: aspects of set-up, probe calibration, data acquisition and data conversion. Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 1378–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasagi, K., Fukagata, K. & Suzuki, Y. 2005 Adaptive control of wall-turbulence for skin friction drag reduction and some consideration for high Reynolds number flows. In Second International Symposium on Seawater Drag Reduction., Busan, South Korea.Google Scholar
Khoo, B. C., Chew, Y. T., Teo, C. J. & Lim, C. P. 1999 Dynamic response of a hot-wire anemometer. Part 3. Voltage-perturbation versus velocity testing for near-wall hot-wire/film probes. Meas. Sci. Technol. 10, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. C. & Adrian, R. 1999 Very large-scale motion in the outer layer. Phys. Fluids 11, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewicki, J. C. & Falco, R. E. 1990 On accurately measuring statistics associated with small-scale structure in turbulent boundary layers using hot-wire probes. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, G. J. & Marusic, I. 2006 Study of the near-wall-turbulent region of the high-Reynolds-number boundary layer using an atmospheric flow. J. Fluid Mech. 548, 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. D. 2004 Dynamic response of constant temperature hot-wire system in turbulence velocity measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 1835–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. D., Mckeon, B. J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2004 The response of hot wires in high Reynolds-number turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P. M. & Bradshaw, P. 1987 Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids 5, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfdahl, L., Stemme, G. & Johansson, B. 1989 A sensor based on silicon technology for turbulence measurements. J. Phys. E 22, 391–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Hutchins, N. & Mathis, R. 2009 High Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulence. In Proceedings of the the Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Marusic, I. & Kunkel, G. J. 2003 Streamwise turbulence intensity formulation for flat-plate boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 15, 2461–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J. & Morrison, J. F. 2007 Asymptotic scaling in turbulent pipe flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 771–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, M. M. & Klewicki, J. C. 2001 A comparative study of near-wall turbulence in high and low Reynolds number boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 13 (3), 692–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M. M., Klewicki, J. C., Bradshaw, K. L. & Sadr, R. 2001 Scaling the near-wall axial turbulent stress in the zero pressure gradient boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1819–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, S. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1996 Reynolds-number-dependence of the maximum in the streamwise velocity fluctuations in wall turbulence. Exp. Fluids 21, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, J. P. 2005 Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flow. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Monty, J. P., Stewart, J. A., Williams, R. C. & Chong, M. S. 2007 Large-scale features in turbulent pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 589, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. C. & Foss, J. F. 2003 Transient thermal response of a hot-wire anemometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. F., McKeon, B. J., Jiang, W. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Scaling of the streamwise velocity component in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R. D., Kim, J. & Mansour, N. N. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re τ = 590. Phys. Fluids 11, 943–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagib, H. & Chauhan, K. 2008 Variations of von kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phys. Fluids 20, 101518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekrasov, Y. P. & Savostenko, P. I. 1991 Pressure dependence of hot-wire anemometer readings. Meas. Tech. 34 (5), 462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, T. B. 2004 Inner scaling for wall-bounded flows subject to large pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I., Hafez, S. & Chong, M. S. 2005 Evidence of the k 1−1 law in a high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Rev. Letters 95, 074501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I., Hafez, S., Hutchins, N. & Chong, M. S. 2007 Some predictions of the attached eddy model for a high Reynolds number boundary layer. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 807–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, L. & Wallace, J. M. 1998 Joint probability density analysis of the structure and dynamics of the vorticity field of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 291–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Österlund, J. M. 1999 Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary-layer flow. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Marusic, I. 1995 A wall wake model for the turbulent structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Marusic, I. & Jones, M. B. 2002 On the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purtell, P., Klebanoff, P. & Buckley, F. 1981 Turbulent boundary layer at low Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 24, 802–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saddoughi, S. G. & Veeravalli, S. V. 1994 Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 268, 333–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saddoughi, S. G. & Veeravalli, S. V. 1996 Hot-wire anemometry behaviour at very high frequencies. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7, 1297–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefes, B. & Fernholz, H. H. 2004 Skin friction and turbulence measurements in a boundary layer with zero-pressure-gradient under the influence of high intensity free-stream turbulence. European J. Mech. B 23, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ueda, H. & Hinze, J. O. 1975 Fine-structure turbulence in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Bogar, T. J. 1977 Survey and new measurements of turbulent structure near the wall. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 20, S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Sharma, L. K. 1984 Study of turbulent structure with hot wires smaller that the viscous length. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, L. A. 1953 A technique for cleaning hot-wires used in anemometry. J. Sci. Instrum. 30, 13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaard, J. C. 1968 Measurement of small-scale turbulence structure with hot-wires. J. Phys. E 1, 1105–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar