Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T07:20:11.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flow structure in the lee of an inclined 6:1 prolate spheroid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

T. C. Fu ,
A. Shekarriz ,
J. Katz  and
T. T. Huang
T. C. Fu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Present address: David Taylor Model Basin, CD/NSWC, Bethesda, MD 20084-5000, USA.
A. Shekarriz
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA Present address: Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
J. Katz
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
T. T. Huang
Affiliation:
David Taylor Model Basin, CD/NSWC, Bethesda, MD 20084-5000, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Particle displacement velocimetry is used to measure the velocity and vorticity distributions around an inclined 6: 1 prolate spheroid. The objective is to determine the effects of boundary-layer tripping, incidence angle, and Reynolds number on the flow structure. The vorticity distributions are also used for computing the lateral forces and rolling moments that occur when the flow is asymmetric. The computed forces agree with results of direct measurements. It is shown that when the flow is not tripped, separation causes the formation of a pair of vortex sheets. The size of these sheets increases with increasing incidence angle and axial location. Their orientation and internal vorticity distribution also depend on incidence. Rollup into distinct vortices occurs in some cases, and the primary vortex contains between 20 % and 50 % of the overall circulation. The entire flow is unsteady and there are considerable variations in the instantaneous vorticity distributions. The remainder of the lee side, excluding these vortex sheets, remains almost vorticity free, providing clear evidence that the flow can be characterized as open separation. Boundary-layer tripping causes earlier separation on part of the model, brings the primary vortex closer to the body, and spreads the vorticity over a larger region. The increased variability in the vorticity distribution causes considerable force fluctuations, but the mean loads remain unchanged. Trends with increasing Reynolds number are conflicting, probably because of boundary-layer transition. The separation point moves towards the leeward meridian and the normal force decreases when the Reynolds number is increased from 0.42 × 106 to 1.3 × 106. Further increase in the Reynolds number to 2.1 × 106 and tripping cause an increase in forces and earlier separation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 269 , 25 June 1994 , pp. 79 - 106
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, K. M. & Simpson, R. L. 1990 Mean velocity and turbulence measurements of flow around a 6: 1 prolate spheroid. VPI Rep. VPI-AOE-174.
Brune, G. W. 1992 Quantitative three-dimensional low-speed wake surveys. In Fifth Symp. on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows, Cal. State Univ., Long Beach, Calif., Jan. 13-15 (ed. T. Cebici).
Costis, C. E., Hoang, N. T. & Telionis, D. P. 1989 Laminar separating flow over a prolate spheroid. J. Aircraft 86, 810–816.Google Scholar
Dempsey, E. M. 1977 Static stability characteristics of a systematic series of stern control surfaces on a body of revolution, David Taylor Naval Ship and Development Center, Rep. 77–0085.
Dong, R., Chu, S. & Katz, J. 1992a Quantitative visualization of the flow structure within the volute of a centrifugal pump, part A: Technique. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 114, 390–395.Google Scholar
Dong, R., Chu, S. & Katz, J. 1992b Quantitative visualization of the flow structure within the volute of a centrifugal pump, part B: Results and analysis. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 114, 396–403.Google Scholar
Gee, K., Cummings, R. M. & Schiff, L. B. 1992 Turbulence model effects on separated flow about a prolate spheroid. AIAA J. 30, 655–664.Google Scholar
Han, T. & Patel, V. C. 1979 Flow separation on a spheroid at incidence. J. Fluid Mech. 92, 643–657.Google Scholar
Kim, S. E. & Patel, V. C. 1991a Laminar flow separation on a spheroid at incidence. AIAA Paper 91–1803.
Kim, S. E. & Patel, V. C. 1991b Separation on a spheroid at incidence: turbulent flow. Second Osaka Intl Colloqu. on Viscous Fluid Dynamics in Ship and Ocean Technology, Osaka, Japan, Sept. 27-30.
Meier, H. U. & Kreplin, H. P. 1980 Experimental investigation of the boundary layer transition and separation on a body of revolution. Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforschung 4(2), 65–71.Google Scholar
Meier, H. U., Kreplin, H. P. & Vollmers, H. 1983 Development of boundary layers and separation pattern on a body of revolution at incidence. In 2nd Symp. on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows, State University, Long Beach CA, January (ed. T. Cebici).
Peake, M. & Tobak, D. J. 1982 Topology of three dimensional separated flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 61–85.Google Scholar
Shekarriz, A., Fu, T. C., Katz, J. & Huang, T. T. 1993 Near field behavior of a tip vortex. AIAA J. 31, 112–118.Google Scholar
Shekarriz, A., Fu, T. C., Katz, J., Liu, H. L. & Huang, T. T. 1992 Quantitative visualization of junction vortices using particle displacement velocimetry. AIAA J. 30, 145–152.Google Scholar
Wang, K. C. 1972 Separation patterns of boundary layer over an inclined body of revolution. AIAA J. 10, 1044–1050.Google Scholar
Wang, K. C. 1983 On the dispute about open separation. AIAA Paper 83-0296.
Wang, K. C., Zhou, H. C., Hu, C. H. & Harrington, S. 1990 Three-dimensional separated flow structure over prolate spheroids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 73–90.Google Scholar
Ward, K. C. & Katz, J. 1989a Topology of the flow structures behind an inclined projectile: part A. J. Aircraft 26, 1016–1022.Google Scholar
Ward, K. C. & Katz, J. 1989b Topology of the flow structures behind an inclined projectile: part B. J. Aircraft 26, 1023–1031.Google Scholar
Ward, B. & Wilson, P. A. 1992 Forces on a body of revolution in a vortex field. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Paper W4 (1992) (preprint).