Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:29:35.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The energy decay in self-preserving isotropic turbulence revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Charles G. Speziale  and
Peter S. Bernard
Charles G. Speziale
Affiliation:
Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665, USA
Peter S. Bernard
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park. MD 20742, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The assumption of self-preservation permits an analytical determination of the energy decay in isotropic turbulence. Batchelor (1948), who was the first to carry out a detailed study of this problem, based his analysis on the assumption that the Loitsianskii integral is a dynamic invariant – a widely accepted hypothesis that was later discovered to be invalid. Nonetheless, it appears that the self-preserving isotropic decay problem has never been reinvestigated in depth subsequent to this earlier work. In the present paper such an analysis is carried out, yielding a much more complete picture of self-preserving isotropic turbulence. It is proven rigorously that complete self-preserving isotropic turbulence admits two general types of asymptotic solutions: one where the turbulent kinetic energy K ∼ t−1 and one where K ∼ t−α with an exponent α > 1 that is determined explicitly by the initial conditions. By a fixed-point analysis and numerical integration of the exact one-point equations, it is demonstrated that the K ∼ t−1 power law decay is the asymptotically consistent high-Reynolds-number solution; the K ∼ t−α decay law is only achieved in the limit as t → ∞ and the turbulence Reynolds number Rt vanishes. Arguments are provided which indicate that a t−1 power law decay is the asymptotic state toward which a complete self-preserving isotropic turbulence is driven at high Reynolds numbers in order to resolve an O(R1½) imbalance between vortex stretching and viscous diffusion. Unlike in previous studies, the asymptotic approach to a complete self-preserving state is investigated which uncovers some surprising results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 241 , August 1992 , pp. 645 - 667
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barenblatt G. J. 1979 Similarity, Self-Similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics. Plenum.
Barenblatt, G. J. & Gavrilov A. A. 1974 On the theory of self-similar degeneracy of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 38, 399–402.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1948 Energy decay and self-preserving correlation functions in isotropic turbulence. Q. Appl. Maths 6, 97–116.Google Scholar
Bachelor G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. & Proudman I. 1956 The large scale structure of homogeneous turbulence Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 248, 369–405.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend A. A. 1947 Decay of vorticity in isotropic turbulence Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 190, 534–550.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend A. A. 1948a Decay of turbulence in the final period Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 194, 527–543.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend A. A. 1948b Decay of isotropic turbulence in the initial period Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 193, 539–558.Google Scholar
Bernard P. S. 1985 Energy and vorticity dynamics in decaying isotropic turbulence. Intl J. Engng Sci. 23, 1037–1057.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. S. & Speziale C. G. 1992 Bounded energy states in homogeneous turbulent shear flow – an alternative view. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 114, 29–39.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin S. 1966 The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657–682.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin. S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlation of full- and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated ‘isotropic’ turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273–337.Google Scholar
Dryden J. L. 1943 A review of the statistical theory of turbulence. Q. Appl. Maths 1, 7–42.Google Scholar
George W. K. 1987 A theory of the decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Tech. Rep. 116. Turbulence Research Laboratory, SUNY at Buffalo.Google Scholar
George W. K. 1989 The self preservation of turbulent flows and its relation to initial conditions and coherent structures. In Recent Advances in Turbulence (ed. G. Arndt & W. K. George). Hemisphere.
George W. K. 1992 The decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A (in press).Google Scholar
Guckenheimer, J. & Holmes P. J. 1986 Nonlinear Oscillations. Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer.
Hinze J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
KaArmaAn, T. von & Howarth L. 1938 On the statistical theory of isotropic turbulence Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 164, 192–215.Google Scholar
Kistler, A. L. & Vrebalovich T. 1966 Grid turbulence at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 37–47.Google Scholar
Korneyev, A. I. & Sedov L. I. 1976 Theory of isotropic turbulence and its comparison with experimental data. Fluid Mechanics – Soviet Research 5, 37–48.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. & Spalding D. B. 1974 The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 3, 269–289.Google Scholar
Lesieur M. 1990 Turbulence in Fluids, 2nd Edn. Martinus Nijhoff.
Lin C. C. 1948 Note on the decay of isotropic turbulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 34, 540–543.Google Scholar
Ling, S. C. & Wan C. A. 1972 Decay of isotropic turbulence generated by a mechanically agitated grid. Phys. Fluids 15, 1363–1369.Google Scholar
Mohamed, M. S. & La Rue J. C. 1990 The decay power law in grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 195–214.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom A. M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, vol. 2. MIT Press.
Proudman, I. & Reid W. H. 1954 On the decay of a normally distributed and homogeneous velocity field Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 247, 163–189.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Siggia E. 1990 Collapsing solutions to the 3-D Euler equations Phys. Fluids A 2, 220–241.Google Scholar
Rosen G. 1981 Incompressible fluid turbulence at large Reynolds numbers: theoretical basis for the t−1 decay law and the form of the longitudinal correlation function. J. Math. Phys. 22, 1819–1823.Google Scholar
Saffman P. G. 1907 The large scale structure of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 581–594.Google Scholar
Sedov L. I. 1944 Decay of isotropic turbulent motions of an incompressible fluid. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 42, 116–119.Google Scholar
Speziale C. G. 1991 Analytical methods for the development of Reynolds stress closures in turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 107–157.Google Scholar
Uberoi M. 1963 Energy transfer in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 6, 1048–1056.Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W. & Antonia, R. A. 1980 Reynolds number dependence of skewness and flatness factors of turbulent velocity derivatives. Phys. Fluids 23, 252–257.Google Scholar
Walker M. D. 1986 Laser Doppler measurements of grid turbulence in a box. Ph. D. thesis. The Johns Hopkins University.
Walker, M. D. & Corrsin S. 1985 Laser Doppler measurements of grid turbulence in a box. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 30, 1734.Google Scholar
Warhaft, Z. & Lumley J. L. 1978 An experimental study of the decay of temperature fluctuations in grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 659–684.Google Scholar