Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:46:01.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct numerical simulation and biglobal stability investigations of the gaseous motion in solid rocket motors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2012

F. Chedevergne ,
G. Casalis  and
J. Majdalani
F. Chedevergne
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics and Energetics Modelling Department, ONERA, Toulouse 31055, France
G. Casalis
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics and Energetics Modelling Department, ONERA, Toulouse 31055, France
J. Majdalani*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma, TN 37388, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, a biglobal stability approach is used in conjunction with direct numerical simulation (DNS) to identify the instability mode coupling that may be responsible for triggering large thrust oscillations in segmented solid rocket motors (SRMs). These motors are idealized as long porous cylinders in which a Taylor–Culick type of motion may be engendered. In addition to the analytically available steady-state solution, a computed mean flow is obtained that is capable of securing all of the boundary conditions in this problem, most notably, the no-slip requirement at the chamber headwall. Two sets of unsteady simulations are performed, static and dynamic, in which the injection velocity at the chamber sidewall is either held fixed or permitted to vary with time. In these runs, both DNS and biglobal stability solutions converge in predicting the same modal dependence on the size of the domain. We find that increasing the chamber length gives rise to less stable eigenmodes. We also realize that introducing an eigenmode whose frequency is sufficiently spaced from the acoustic modes leads to a conventional linear evolution of disturbances that can be accurately predicted by the biglobal stability framework. While undergoing spatial amplification in the streamwise direction, these disturbances will tend to decay as time elapses so long as their temporal growth rate remains negative. By seeding the computations with the real part of a specific eigenfunction, the DNS outcome reproduces not only the imaginary part of the disturbance, but also the circular frequency and temporal growth rate associated with its eigenmode. For radial fluctuations in which the vorticoacoustic wave contribution is negligible in relation to the hydrodynamic stability part, excellent agreement between DNS and biglobal stability predictions is ubiquitously achieved. For axial fluctuations, however, the DNS velocity will match the corresponding stability eigenfunction only when properly augmented by the vorticoacoustic solution for axially travelling waves associated with the Taylor–Culick profile. This analytical approximation of the vorticoacoustic mode is found to be quite accurate, especially when modified using a viscous dissipation function that captures the decaying envelope of the inviscid acoustic wave amplitude. In contrast, pursuant to both static and dynamic test cases, we find that when the frequency of the introduced eigenmode falls close to (or crosses over) an acoustic mode, a nonlinear mechanism is triggered that leads to the emergence of a secondary eigenmode. Unlike the original eigenmode, the latter materializes naturally in the computed flow without being artificially seeded. This natural occurrence may be ascribed to a nonlinear modal interplay in the form of internal, eigenmode-to-eigenmode coupling instead of an external, eigenmode pairing with acoustic modes. As a result of these interactions, large amplitude oscillations are induced.

JFM classification

Instability: Absolute/convective instability Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Vortex Flows: Vortex shedding
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 706 , 10 September 2012 , pp. 190 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Present address: Fundamental and Applied Energetics Department, ONERA, Châtillon, France.

References

1. Abu-Irshaid, E. M., Majdalani, J. & Casalis, G. 2007 Hydrodynamic stability of rockets with headwall injection. Phys. Fluids 19 (2), 024101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Apte, S. & Yang, V. 2001a Unsteady flow evolution in a porous chamber with surface mass injection. Part 1. Free oscillation. AIAA J. 39 (8), 1577–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Apte, S. & Yang, V. 2001b Unsteady flow evolution in porous chamber with surface mass injection. Part 2. Acoustic excitation. AIAA J. 40 (2), 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Apte, S. & Yang, V. 2003 A large-eddy simulation study of transition and flow instability in a porous-walled chamber with mass injection. J. Fluid Mech. 477, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Avalon, G., Casalis, G. & Griffond, J. 1998 Flow instabilities and acoustic resonance of channels with wall injection. In 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 98-3218.Google Scholar
6. Avalon, G. & Josset, T. 2006 Cold gas experiments applied to the understanding of aeroacoustic phenomena inside solid propellant boosters. In 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2006-5111.Google Scholar
7. Beddini, R. A. 1986 Injection induced flows in porous-walled ducts. AIAA J. 24 (11), 1766–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Berman, A. 1953 Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J. Appl. Phys. 24 (9), 1232–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Casalis, G., Avalon, G. & Pineau, J.-P. 1998 Spatial instability of planar channel flow with fluid injection through porous walls. Phys. Fluids 10 (10), 2558–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Casalis, G., Chedevergne, F., Féraille, T. & Avalon, G. 2004 Global stability of the flow induced by wall injection. In IUTAM Symp. Laminar–Turbulent Transition, Bangalore, India (ed. R. Govindarajan). Springer.Google Scholar
11. Chedevergne, F. & Casalis, G. 2005 Thrust oscillations in reduced scale solid rocket motors. Part 2. A theoretical approach. In 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2005-4000.Google Scholar
12. Chedevergne, F. & Casalis, G. 2006 a Detailed analysis of the thrust oscillations in reduced scale solid rocket motors. In 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2006-4424.Google Scholar
13. Chedevergne, F. & Casalis, G. 2006 b Front wall boundary layer influence on the stability of the flow induced by wall injection. In 7th ONERA DLR Aerospace Symp, Toulouse, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Chedevergne, F., Casalis, G. & Féraille, T. 2006 Biglobal linear stability analysis of the flow induced by wall injection. Phys. Fluids 18 (1), 014103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Chu, B.-T. & Kovásznay, L. S. G. 1958 Non-linear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compressible gas. J. Fluid Mech. 3 (5), 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Couton, D., Doan-Kim, S. & Vuillot, F. 1997 Numerical simulation of vortex-shedding phenomenon in a channel with flow induced through porous wall. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 18 (3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Culick, F. E. C. 1966 Rotational axisymmetric mean flow and damping of acoustic waves in a solid propellant rocket. AIAA J. 4 (8), 1462–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Culick, F. E. C. 1968 A review of calculations for unsteady burning of a solid propellant. AIAA J. 6 (12), 2241–2254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Dunlap, R., Blackner, A. M., Waugh, R. C., Brown, R. S. & Willoughby, P. G. 1990 Internal flow field studies in a simulated cylindrical port rocket chamber. J. Propul. Power 6 (6), 690–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Fabignon, Y., Dupays, J., Avalon, G., Vuillot, F., Lupoglazoff, N., Casalis, G. & Prévost, M. 2003 Instabilities and pressure oscillations in solid rocket motors. Aero. Sci. Technol. 7 (3), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Golub, G. H. & Loan, C. F. Van. 1996 Matrix Computations, 3rd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
22. Griffond, J. 2002 Receptivity and aeroacoustic resonance in channels with blowing walls. Phys. Fluids 14 (11), 3946–3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Griffond, J. & Casalis, G. 2000 On the dependence on the formulation of some nonparallel stability approaches applied to the Taylor flow. Brief Comm. Phys. Fluids 12 (2), 466–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Griffond, J. & Casalis, G. 2001 On the nonparallel stability of the injection induced two-dimensional Taylor flow. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1635–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Griffond, J., Casalis, G. & Pineau, J. P. 2000 Spatial instability of flow in a semiinfinite cylinder with fluid injection through its porous walls. Eur. J. Mech. B 19 (1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Kuentzmann, P. 1991 Combustion Instabilities, AGARD, vol. LS 180. AGARDograph.Google Scholar
27. Kurdyumov, V. N. 2008 Viscous and inviscid flows generated by wall-normal injection into a cylindrical cavity with a headwall. Phys. Fluids 20 (12), 123602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Lee, Y. & Beddini, R. A. 1999 Acoustically-induced turbulent transition in solid propellant rocket chamber flow fields. In 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 99-2508.Google Scholar
29. Lee, Y. & Beddini, R. A. 2000 Effect of solid rocket chamber pressure on acoustically-induced turbulent transition. In 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2000-3802.Google Scholar
30. Lupoglazoff, N. & Vuillot, F. 1996 Parietal vortex shedding as a cause of instability for long solid propellant motors: numerical simulations and comparisons with firing tests. In 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 96-0761.Google Scholar
31. Majdalani, J. 1998 A hybrid multiple scale procedure for boundary layers involving several dissimilar scales. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 49 (6), 849–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Majdalani, J. 1999 The boundary layer structure in cylindrical rocket motors. AIAA J. 37 (4), 505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Majdalani, J., Flandro, G. & Roh, T. 2000 Convergence of two flowfield models predicting a destabilizing agent in rocket combustion. J. Propul. Power 16 (3), 492–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Majdalani, J. 2001a The oscillatory channel flow with arbitrary wall injection. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 52 (1), 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Majdalani, J. 2001b Vorticity dynamics in isobarically closed porous channels. Part I: standard perturbations. J. Propul. Power 17 (2), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Majdalani, J. 2007 On steady rotational high speed flows: the compressible Taylor–Culick profile. Proc. R. Soc. A 463 (2077), 131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Majdalani, J. 2009 Multiple asymptotic solutions for axially travelling waves in porous channels. J. Fluid Mech. 636 (1), 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Majdalani, J. & Akiki, M. 2010 Rotational and quasiviscous cold flow models for axisymmetric hybrid propellant chambers. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 132 (10), 101202.Google Scholar
39. Majdalani, J. & Flandro, G. A. 2002 The oscillatory pipe flow with arbitrary wall injection. Proc. R. Soc. A 458 (2022), 1621–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Majdalani, J. & Rienstra, S. W. 2002 Two asymptotic forms of the rotational solution for wave propagation inside viscous channels with transpiring walls. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 55 (1), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Majdalani, J. & Roh, T. S. 2000 The oscillatory channel flow with large wall injection. Proc. R. Soc. A 456 (1999), 1625–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Majdalani, J. & Van Moorhem, W. K. 1998 Improved time-dependent flow field solution for solid rocket motors. AIAA J. 36 (2), 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Majdalani, J., Vyas, A. B. & Flandro, G. A. 2002 Higher mean-flow approximation for a solid rocket motor with radially regressing walls. AIAA J. 40 (9), 1780–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Majdalani, J., Vyas, A. B. & Flandro, G. A. 2009 Higher mean-flow approximation for a solid rocket motor with radially regressing walls: erratum. AIAA J. 47 (1), 286–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Prévost, M. & Godon, J. Cl. 2005 Thrust oscillations in reduced scale solid rocket motors. Part 1. Experimental investigations. In 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2005-4003.Google Scholar
46. Refloch, A., Courbet, B., Murrone, A., Villedieu, P., Laurent, C., Gilbank, P., Troyes, J., Tessé, L., Chaineray, G., Dargaud, J. B., Quémerais, E. & Vuillot, F. 2011 CEDRE software. The ONERA J., AerospaceLab 2, http://www.aerospacelab-journal.org.Google Scholar
47. Taylor, G. I. 1956 Fluid flow in regions bounded by porous surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A 234 (1199), 456–475.Google Scholar
48. Theofilis, V. 2003 Advances in global linear instability analysis of nonparallel and three-dimensional flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39 (4), 249–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Theofilis, V. 2011 Global linear instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 319–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Theofilis, V., Duck, P. W. & Owen, J. 2004 Viscous linear stability analysis of rectangular duct and cavity flows. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 249–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Ugurtas, B., Avalon, G., Lupoglazoff, N. & Vuillot, F. 1999 Numerical computations of hydrodynamic instabilities inside channels with wall injection. In 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 99-2505.Google Scholar
52. Varapaev, V. N. & Yagodkin, V. I. 1969 Flow stability in a channel with porous wall. Fluid Dyn. (Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza) 4 (5), 91–95.Google Scholar
53. Vuillot, F. 1995 Vortex shedding phenomena in solid propellant motors. J. Propul. Power 11 (4), 626–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Vuillot, F., Scherrer, D. & Habiballah, M. 2003 CFD code validation for space propulsion applications. In 5th Int. Symp. Liquid Space Prop. Chattanooga, Tennessee. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center.Google Scholar

Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie

Evolution of the unsteady radial velocity showing the effects of temporal damping for case 1 with an eigenmode of 40.409 - 9.164i.

Download Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3.2 MB

Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie

Evolution of the unsteady radial velocity showing the effects of temporal damping for case 1 with an eigenmode of 40.409 - 9.164i.

Download Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 480.4 KB

Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie

Evolution of the unsteady axial velocity showing the effects of temporal damping for case 1 with an eigenmode of 40.409 - 9.164i.

Download Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.5 MB

Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie

Evolution of the unsteady axial velocity showing the effects of temporal damping for case 1 with an eigenmode of 40.409 - 9.164i.

Download Chedevergne et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 920.3 KB