Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T22:47:10.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing large-scale wavelike eddies and the near jet noise field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

J. T. C. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London
Permanent address: Division of Engineering and the Centre for Fluid Dynamics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Abstract

In this paper we study the development of large-scale wavelike eddies, or instability waves, in a turbulent free shear flow. The model is based on splitting the flow into three components: the mean flow, the instability wave and the fine-scale turbulence. The wave is considered to be sufficiently weak so that it is developing in a pre-existing, known turbulent mean shear flow. The basis for the wave development is its time-averaged kinetic energy flux equation in integral form and the wave description is obtained through a shape assumption: the amplitude is determined by the energy equation; the shape function and local characteristics are determined by the local linear stability theory. The wave energy changes as it is convected into a different streamwise position where its instability properties change. The energy balancing mechanisms are production, work done by the wave pressure gradients and the energy transfer between the wave and the fine-scale turbulence via the wave-induced Reynolds stresses. The latter is taken to be dissipative via an eddy-viscosity model, inertia—elastic effects not being considered. According to forceful evidence from observations in turbulent free shear flows, the wave development is taken as being upstream controlled and begins from a distinct origin rather than being the result of local forcing by variations of the fine-scale turbulent Reynolds stresses. The wave energy flux initially grows via energy supplied by the inflexional mean flow when the shear layer is relatively thin but eventually decays through action of the finescale turbulence, directly via the dissipative energy transfer and indirectly via the turbulence-diffused, rapidly thickened mean shear flow, which renders the production mechanism less available. Numerical calculations are carried out for a turbulent mean shear flow, with speed Tie on one side and zero in the ambient region, its distribution being approximated by a sine profile in the Howarth-Dorodnitsyn co-ordinate. The flow develops from an initial boundary layer of finite thickness δ0 to a similar free-mixing layer far downstream. The wave is characterized by a dimensionless frequency parameter β0 formed from the wave frequency β*, ue, and δ0. Convection speeds, in general, increase in the downstream direction. They are subsonic initially for Mach numbers Me < 2 and remain subsonic for Me < 1.5. For Me > 2 peaking in the local intensity levels occurs when convection speeds are supersonic and this may explain the observed supersonic far-field radiation a t the higher jet speeds. Induced wave patterns in the ambient region are determined by the complex instability-wave speed rather than the real convection speed alone, consequently ambient wave patterns exist even a t subsonic convection speeds, but are more heavily damped near the origin and fan out laterally downstream for a given β0. According to the present model, if the waves are given an upstream excitation level about 10−3–10−2 times that of Ue, resembling, for instance, the levels of the upstream wall turbulent boundary-layer fluctuations over a wide, low-frequency, spectrum or other possible disturbances a t the nozzle exit, the development of the calculated near noise field as a function of downstream distance bears striking resemblances to the observed near jet noise field and is thus fully sufficient to explain such observations. This comparison leads to the suggestion that the essential energetics of the large-scale wavelike eddies are that they are formed at the origin, amplified and subsequently decay in a developing mean turbulent free shear flow. Therefore this leads also to a most important indication of shear-layer instabilities and noise control. If their historical evolution can be controlled so can the noise from the damaging wavelike eddies. Methods of control on the basis of this model are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alber, I. E. & Lees, L. 1968 Integral theory for supersonic turbulent base flows A.I.A.A. J. 2, 1343.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Gill, A. E. 1962 Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets J. Fluid Mech. 14, 529.Google Scholar
Betchov, R. & Criminale, W. O. 1967 Stability of Parallel Flows. Academic.
Bishop, K. A., Ffowcs, Williams J. E. & Smith, W. 1971 On the noise sources of the unsuppressed high speed jet J. Fluid Mech. 50, 21.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P., Ferriss, D. H. & Johnson, R. F. 1964 Turbulence in the noise-producing region of a circular jet J. Fluid Mech. 19, 591.Google Scholar
Brown, G. & Roshko, A. 1971 The effect of density difference on the turbulent mixing layer. In A.G.A.R.D. Conf. on Turbulent Shear Flows, p. 23/1. Conf. Proc. no. 93.
Brown, G. & Roshko, A. 1972 Structure of the turbulent mixing layer. In Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Theor. Appl. Mech., Moscow.
Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. H. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence J. Fluid Mech. 48, 547.Google Scholar
Dosanjh, D. S. & Yu, J. C. 1969 Noise from underexpanded axisymmetric jet flows using radial jet flow impingement. In Aerodynamic Noise (ed. H. S. Ribner), p. 169. University of Toronto Press.
Eggers, J. M. 1966 Velocity profiles and eddy viscosity distributions downstream of a Mach 2–22 nozzle exhausting to quiescent air. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note, D–3601.Google Scholar
Elswick, Jr. R. C. 1971 Wave-induced Reynolds stress in turbulent shear layer stability. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1968 Some open questions on the jet noise problem. Boeing Sci. Res. Lab. Doc. D1-82-0730.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1969a Jet noise research. In Basic Aerodynamic Noise Research (ed. I. R. Schwartz), p. 3. N.A.S.A. SP–207.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1969b Jet noise at very low and very high speed. In Aerodynamic Noise (ed. H. S. Ribner), p. 131. University of Toronto Press.
Grant, H. L. 1958 The large eddies of turbulent motion J. Fluid Mech. 4, 149.Google Scholar
Gururaj, P. M. & Liu, J. T. C. 1971 The incipient transition region of two-dimensional hypersonic wakes. A.I.A.A. Paper, no. 71–202.Google Scholar
Howes, W. L., Callaghan, E. E., Coles, W. D. & Mull, H. R. 1957 Near noise field of a jet-engine exhaust. N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 1338.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow J. Fluid Mech. 41, 241.Google Scholar
Jones, I. S. F. 1971 Finite amplitude waves from a supersonic jet. A.I.A.A. Paper, no. 71–151.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1970 The turbulent boundary layer over a wall with progressive surface waves J. Fluid Mech. 41, 259.Google Scholar
Kistler, A. L. & Chen, W. S. 1963 The fluctuating pressure field in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer J. Fluid Mech. 16, 41.Google Scholar
Ko, D. R. S., Kubota, T. & Lees, L. 1970 Finite disturbance effect in the stability of a laminar incompressible wake behind a flat plate J. Fluid Mech. 40, 315.Google Scholar
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1970 The turbulent boundary layer Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2, 95.Google Scholar
Kubota, T. & Dewey, C. F. 1964 Momentum integral methods for the laminar free shear layer A.I.A.A. J. 2, 625.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1967 A wave-guide model for turbulent shear flow J. Fluid Mech. 29, 441.Google Scholar
Lassiter, L. W. & Hubbard, H. H. 1956 The near noise field of static jets and some model studies of devices for noise reduction. N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 1261.Google Scholar
Lees, L. & Gold, H. 1964 Stability of laminar boundary layers and wakes at hypersonic speeds. Part I. Stability of laminar wakes. In Proc. Int. Symp. on Fundamental Phenomena in Hypersonic Flow (ed. J. G. Hall), p. 310. Cornell University Press.
Lees, L. & Lin, C. C. 1946 Investigation of the stability of the laminar boundary layer in a compressible fluid. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note, TN-1115.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H. W. 1964 Free turbulent flows. In The Mechanics of Turbulence, p. 211. Int. Symp. Nat. Sci. Res. Centre, Marseille 1961. Gordon & Breach.
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 211, 564.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1962 Sound generated aerodynamically. (The Bakerian Lecture, 1961.) Proc. Roy. Soc. A 267, 147.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1969 The outlook for a wave theory of turbulent shear flows. In Proc. Comp. Turbulent Boundary Layers, vol. 1 (ed. S. J. Kline, M. V. Morkovin, G. Sovran & D. J. Cockrell), p. 511. Stanford University Press.
Liu, J. T. C. 1969 Finite amplitude instability of the compressible laminar wake. Weakly nonlinear theory Phys. Fluids, 12, 1763.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. 1971a Nonlinear development of an instability wave in a turbulent wake Phys. Fluids, 14, 2251.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. 1971b On eddy Mach wave radiation source mechanism in the jet noise problem. A.I.A.A. Paper, no. 71–150.Google Scholar
Liu, J. T. C. & Lees, L. 1970 Finite amplitude instability of the compressible laminar wake. Strongly amplified disturbances Phys. Fluids, 13, 2932.Google Scholar
Love, E. S. & Grigsby, C. E. 1955 Some studies of axisymmetric free jets exhausting from sonic and supersonic nozzles into still air and into supersonic streams. N.A.C.A. Res. Memo. RM L54L31.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In Proc. Int. Coll. Atmospheric Turbulence & Radio Wave Propagation (ed. A. M. Yaglom & V. L. Tatarsky), p. 166. Moscow: Nauka Press.
Maestrello, L. & McDaid, E. 1971 Acoustic characteristics of a high-subsonic jet A.I.A.A. J. 9, 1058.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. 1956 Outline of a theory of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 521.Google Scholar
Mamin, V. M. & Rimskiy-Korsakov, A. V. 1967 The supersonic air jet as a source of sound. In Physics of Aerodynamic Noise (ed. A. V. Rimskiy-Korsakov). Moscow: Nauka Press. (Trans. N.A.S.A. Tech. Trans. F-538; also available from Nat. Lending Library for Sci. & Tech. Boston Spa, Yorkshire.)
Mayes, W. H., Lanford, W. E. & Hubbard, H. H. 1959 Near field and far field noise surveys of solid fuel rocket engines for a range of nozzle exit pressures. N.A.S.A. Tech. Note, D-21.Google Scholar
Merkine, L. & Liu, J. T. C. 1972 On the mechanism of noise radiation from a fully-expanded two-dimensional supersonic turbulent jet. A.I.A.A. Paper, no. 72–156.Google Scholar
Michalke, A. 1969 Sound generation by amplified disturbances in free shear layers. Deutsche Luft-und Raumfahrt Rep. no. 69–90.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1967 The interaction of turbulence with strong wind shear. In Proc. Int. Coll. Atmospheric Turbulence & Radio Wave Propagation (ed. A. M. Yaglom & V. L. Tatarsky), p. 139. Moscow: Nauka Press.
Moffatt, H. K. 1969 Waves versus eddies. In Proc. Comp. Turbulent Boundary Layers, vol. 1 (ed. S. J. Kline, M. V. Morkovin, G. Sovran & D. J. Cockrell), p. 495. Stanford University Press.
Mollo-Christensen, E. 1960 Some aspects of free-shear-layer instability and sound emission. N.A.T.O.-A.G.A.R.D. Rep. no. 260.Google Scholar
Mollo-Christensen, E. 1967 Jet noise and shear flow instability seen from an experimenter's viewpoint. A.S.M.E. J. Appl. Mech. E 89, 1.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V. 1964 Effects of compressibility on turbulent flows. In The Mechanics of Turbulence, p. 367. Int. Symp. Nat. Sci. Res. Centre, Marseille 1961. Gordon & Breach.
Nagamatsu, H. & Horvay, G. 1970 Supersonic jet noise. A.I.A.A. Paper, no. 70–237.Google Scholar
Ollerhead, J. 1966 Some shadowgraph experiments with a cold supersonic jet. Wyle Lab. Res. Staff Rep. WR 66–44.Google Scholar
Oseberg, O. K. & Kline, S. J. 1971 The near field of a plane jet with several initial conditions. Thermosci. Div., Stanford University Rep. MD–28.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1966 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, p. 90. Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, O. M. 1969 Shear-flow turbulence Ann Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 245.Google Scholar
Potter, R. C. & Jones, J. H. 1968 An experiment to locate the acoustic sources in a high speed jet exhaust stream. Wyle Lab. Res. Staff Rep. WR 68–4.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. C. 1972 Large-scale instabilities of turbulent wakes J. Fluid Mech. 54, 481.Google Scholar
Roshko, A. 1960 Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at very high Reynolds number J. Fluid Mech. 10, 345.Google Scholar
Salant, R. F., Gregory, F. Z. & Kolesar, R. R. 1971 Holographic study of the Mach wave field generated by a supersonic turbulent jet. In Proc. Noise Control. Conf. (ed. M. J. Crocker), p. 444. Purdue University Press.
Sato, H. & Kuriki, K. 1961 Mechanism of transition in the wake of a thin flat plate placed parallel to a uniform flow J. Fluid Mech. 11, 321.Google Scholar
Sedel'Nikov, T. Kh. 1967 The frequency spectrum of the noise of a supersonic jet. In Physics of Aerodynamic Noise (ed. A. V. Rimskiy-Korsakov). Moscow: Nauka Press. (Trans. N.A.S.A. Tech. Trans. F–538; also available from Nat. Lending Library for Sci. & Tech., Boston Spa, Yorkshire.)
Stuart, J. T. 1958 On the nonlinear mechanics of hydrodynamic stability J. Fluid Mech. 4, 1.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1971 Directional acoustic radiation from a supersonic jet generated by shear layer instability J. Fluid Mech. 46, 757.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1972 On the noise of a nearly ideally expanded supersonic jet J. Fluid Mech. 51, 69.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, p. 123. Cambridge University Press.
Webster, R. B. 1970 Jet noise simulation on shallow water J. Fluid Mech. 40, 423.Google Scholar
Westley, R. & Lilley, G. M. 1952 An investigation of the noise field from a small jet and methods for its reduction. Cranfield College Aeron. Rep. no. 53.Google Scholar