Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:21:22.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autorotating flat-plate wings: the effect of the moment of inertia, geometry and Reynolds number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

J. D. Iversen
J. D. Iversen
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Research Institute, Iowa State University, Ames
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Free-flight and wind-tunnel measurements by previous investigators of the flat-plate autorotation phenomenon have been analysed. The variation of the autorotation characteristics with changes in the Reynolds number and the aspect ratio, thickness ratio and moment of inertia of the flat plate have been correlated. The interpretation of the role of the Reynolds number made in a previous investigation is shown to be incorrect. The tip-speed ratio, for the ranges of the dimensionless parameters investigated, is shown to be a function of only the plate aspect ratio, thickness ratio, and also the moment of inertia if the latter is sufficiently small. The lift and drag coefficients, and therefore the free-flight glide angle, are shown to be functions of the tip-speed ratio, the aspect ratio and the Reynolds numbers based on the chord and plate thickness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , 28 May 1979 , pp. 327 - 348
Copyright
© 1979 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackeret, J. 1925 Neure Untersuchungen der Aerodynamischen Versuchsanstalt, Göttingen. Z. Flugtech. Motorluftschiffahrt 16, 44.Google Scholar
Ahlborn, F. 1930 The Magnus effect in theory and reality. N.A.C.A. Tech. Memo no. 567.Google Scholar
Alvarez-calderon, A. & Arnold, F. R. 1961 A study of the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-lift device based on a rotating cylinder and flap. Stanford Univ. Tech. Rep. RCF-1.Google Scholar
Blackwell, B. F. 1974 The vertical axis wind turbine ‘how it works.’ The vertical axis wind turbine ‘how it works.’Rep. SAND 74-0435.Google Scholar
Brunk, J. E. 1965 Application of a semi-rectangular autorotating cylinder to a high-lift wing and flap combination. Alpha Res. Inc. Rep. no. 65–1.Google Scholar
Buford, W. E. 1954 Magnus effect in the case of rotating cylinders and shall. Ballistic Res. Lab. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. Memo Rep. no. 821.Google Scholar
Bustamante, A. G. & Stone, G. W. 1969 The autorotation characteristics of various shapes for subsonic and hypersonic flows. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 69–132.Google Scholar
Crabtree, L. F. 1960 The rotating flap as a high-lift device. Aero. Res. Counc. Current Paper no. 480.Google Scholar
Diederich, F. W. 1951 A planform parameter for correlating certain characteristics of swept wings. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note no. 2335.Google Scholar
Dupleich, P. 1941 Rotation in free fall of rectangular wings of elongated shape. N.A.C.A. Tech. Memo no. 1201.Google Scholar
Glaser, J. C. & Northup, L. L. 1971 Aerodynamic study of autorotating flat plates. Aerodynamic study of autorotating flat plates.Rep. ISU-ERI-Ames 71037.Google Scholar
Iversen, J. D. 1969 The Magnus rotor as an aerodynamic decelerator. Proc. Aerodyn. Deceleration Systems Conf. vol. 2. pp. 385–395. Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards AFB, California.Google Scholar
Iversen, J. D. 1973 Correlation of Magnus force data for slender spinning cylinders. J. Spacecraft Rockets 10, 268–272.Google Scholar
Jacobson, I. D. 1973 Magnus characteristics of arbitrary rotating bodies. Agardograph no. 171.Google Scholar
Kelly, H. R. 1954 An analytical method for predicting the Magnus forces and moments on spinning projectiles. U.S. Naval Ord. Test Stn, China Lake, Calif., Tech. Memo no. 1634.Google Scholar
Kelly, H. R. & Thacker, G. R. 1956 The effect of high spin on the Magnus force on a cylinder at small angles of attack. NAVORD Rep. no. 5036.Google Scholar
Klemin, A. 1925 The Savenius wing rotor. Mech. Engng 47, 911.Google Scholar
Klemin, A. 1932 A rotor airplane. Sci. Am. 146, 362.Google Scholar
Magnus, G. 1853 Ueber die Abseichung der Geschosse. Poggendorfer Ann. Phys. 88, 604.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. 1854 Rotation of a falling card. Camb. Dublin Math. J. 9, 145.Google Scholar
Platou, A. S. 1961 The Magnus force on a rotating cylinder in transonic cross flows. Ballistic Res. Lab. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md, Rep. no. 1150.Google Scholar
Power, H. L. & Iversen, J. D. 1973 Magnus effect on spinning bodies of revolution. A.I.A.A. J. 11, 417–418.Google Scholar
Regan, F. J. 1966 Magnus effects. The Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Ballistics. Agard Conf. Proc. no. 10.Google Scholar
Reid, E. G. 1924 Tests of rotating cylinders. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note no. 209.Google Scholar
Riabouchinsky, D. P. 1935 Thirty years of theoretical and experimental research in fluid mechanics. J. Roy. Aero. Soc. 35, 282–348, 377–444.Google Scholar
Savonius, S. J. 1926 The Wing-Rotor in Theory and Practice. Helsingfors, Finland: Savonius.
Smith, E. H. 1970 Autorotating wings: an experimental investigation. Univ. Michigan Aerospace Engng Rep. no. 01954-2-7.Google Scholar
Smith, E. H. 1971 Autorotating wings: an experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 513–534.Google Scholar
Swanson, W. M. 1961 The Magnus effect: a summary of investigations to date. J. Basic Engng 82, 461–470.Google Scholar
Thom, A. 1934 On the effect of discs on the air forces on a rotating cylinder. Aero. Res. Counc. R. & M. no. 1623.Google Scholar
Uselton, J. C. 1966 Investigation of the Magnus effects and the effects of unsymmetrical leeward vortex patterns of a high fineness ratio model at Mach numbers 3 and 5. M.Sc. thesis, University of Tennessee. (See also AEDC Tech. Rep. no. 66–171.)
Vorrèiter, J. W. & Tate, D. L. 1973 Observations of disk-shaped bodies in free flight at terminal velocity. N.A.S.A. Tech. Memo no. X-62262.Google Scholar
Willhoft, R. O. 1927 Industrial applications of the Flettner rotor. Mech. Engng. 49, 249.Google Scholar
Wolff, E. B. & Konig, C. 1926 Tests for determining the effect of a rotating cylinder fitted into the leading edge of an airplane wing. N.A.C.A. Tech. Memo no. 354.Google Scholar
Yelmgren, K. 1966 The autorotation of Magnus rotors. The autorotation of Magnus rotors.Rep.Google Scholar