Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:47:53.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymmetry of vertical buoyancy gradient in stratified turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2019

Andrea Maffioli Open the ORCID record for Andrea Maffioli [Opens in a new window]
Andrea Maffioli*
Affiliation:
LMFA, École Centrale de Lyon, 69134 Écully, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the asymmetry of the buoyancy field in the vertical direction in stratified turbulence. While this asymmetry is known, its causes are not well understood, and it has not been systematically quantified previously. Using theoretical arguments, it is shown that both stratified turbulence and isotropic turbulence in the presence of a mean scalar gradient will become positively skewed, as a direct consequence of the presence of stratification and mean scalar gradient, respectively. Assuming a rapid adjustment of isotropic turbulence to a stable stratification on a time scale $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}\sim N^{-1}$, where $N$ is the Brunt–Väisälä frequency, a scaling for the skewness of the vertical buoyancy gradient is obtained. Direct numerical simulations of stratified turbulence with forcing are performed and the positive skewness of $\unicode[STIX]{x2202}b/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z$ is confirmed ($b$ is the buoyancy). Both the volume-averaged dimensional skewness, $\langle (\unicode[STIX]{x2202}b/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z)^{3}\rangle$, and the non-dimensional skewness, $S$, are computed and compared against the theoretical predictions. There is a good agreement for $\langle (\unicode[STIX]{x2202}b/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z)^{3}\rangle$, while there is a discrepancy in the behaviour of $S$. The theory predicts $S\sim 1$ and a constant skewness, while the direct numerical simulations confirm that the skewness is $O(1)$ but with a remaining dependence on the Froude number. The results are interpreted as being due to the concurrent action of linear and nonlinear processes in stratified turbulence leading to $S>0$ and to the formation of layers and interfaces in vertical profiles of buoyancy.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Isotropic turbulence Turbulent Flows: Rotating turbulence Turbulent Flows: Stratified turbulence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 870 , 10 July 2019 , pp. 266 - 289
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartello, P., Métais, O. & Lesieur, M. 1994 Coherent structures in rotating three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 273, 1–29.Google Scholar
Billant, P. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2000 Experimental evidence for a new instability of a vertical columnar vortex pair in a strongly stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 167–188.Google Scholar
Billant, P. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2001 Self-similarity of strongly stratified inviscid flows. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1645–1651.Google Scholar
Bos, W. J. T. 2014 On the anisotropy of the turbulent passive scalar in the presence of a mean scalar gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 744, 38–64.Google Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Billant, P., Lindborg, E. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2007 Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 343–368.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K., Guyomar, D. & Yoon, S.-C. 1987 The behavior of a turbulent front in a stratified fluid: experiments with an oscillating grid. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 5329–5341.Google Scholar
de Bruyn Kops, S. M. 2015 Classical scaling and intermittency in strongly stratified Boussinesq turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 775, 436–463.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. A. 2013 Turbulence in Rotating, Stratified and Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desaubies, Y. & Gregg, M. C. 1981 Reversible and irreversible fine structure. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 11, 541–556.Google Scholar
Deusebio, E., Boffetta, G., Lindborg, E. & Musacchio, S. 2014 Dimensional transition in rotating turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 90, 023005.Google Scholar
Donzis, D. A., Sreenivasan, K. R. & Yeung, P. K. 2005 Scalar dissipation rate and dissipative anomaly in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 532, 199–216.Google Scholar
Eswaran, V. & Pope, S. B. 1988 An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence. Comput. Fluids 16 (3), 257–278.Google Scholar
Gan, L., Baqui, Y. B. & Maffioli, A. 2016 An experimental investigation of forced steady rotating turbulence. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 58, 59–69.Google Scholar
Gence, J.-N. & Frick, C. 2001 Naissance des corrélations triples de vorticité dans une turbulence statistiquement homogène soumise à une rotation. C. R. Acad. Sci. llb Mec. 329 (5), 351–356.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. C., D’Asaro, E. A., Riley, J. J. & Kunze, E. 2018 Mixing efficiency in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 10 (1), 443–473.Google Scholar
Holford, J. M. & Linden, P. F. 1999 Turbulent mixing in a stratified fluid. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 30, 173–198.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J., Browand, F. K. & Gagne, Y. 1982 Turbulence and waves in a rotating tank. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 505–534.Google Scholar
Kimura, Y., Sullivan, P. & Herring, J. 2016 Temperature front formation in stably stratified turbulence. In International Symposium on Stratified Flows, vol. 1. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/63p0g457.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1983 Stratified turbulence and the mesoscale variability of the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 749–761.Google Scholar
Lindborg, E. 2006 The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 207–242.Google Scholar
Maffioli, A. 2017 Vertical spectra of stratified turbulence at large horizontal scales. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 104802.Google Scholar
Maffioli, A., Brethouwer, G. & Lindborg, E. 2016 Mixing efficiency in stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 794, R3.Google Scholar
Maffioli, A., Davidson, P. A., Dalziel, S. B. & Swaminathan, N. 2014 The evolution of a stratified turbulent cloud. J. Fluid Mech. 739, 229–253.Google Scholar
Mydlarski, L. & Warhaft, Z. 1998 Passive scalar statistics in high-Peclet-number grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 135–175.Google Scholar
Park, Y.-G., Whitehead, J. A. & Gnanadeskian, A. 1994 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids: layer formation and energetics. J. Fluid Mech. 279, 279–311.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1972 Turbulence in a strongly stratified fluid is it unstable? Deep-Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 19 (1), 79–81.Google Scholar
Pinkel, R., Sherman, J., Smith, J. & Anderson, S. 1991 Strain: observations of the vertical gradient of isopycnal vertical displacement. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 21, 527–540.Google Scholar
Posmentier, Eric S. 1977 The generation of salinity finestructure by vertical diffusion. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7 (2), 298–300.Google Scholar
Riley, J. J. & de Bruyn Kops, S. M. 2003 Dynamics of turbulence strongly influenced by buoyancy. Phys. Fluids 15 (7), 2047–2059.Google Scholar
Riley, J. J. & Lelong, M.-P. 2000 Fluid motions in the presence of strong stable stratification. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 613–657.Google Scholar
Rogallo, R. S.1981 Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. Tech. Mem. 81835. NASA.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2003 Geometric features of the mixing of passive scalars at high Schmidt numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (17).Google Scholar
Staplehurst, P. J., Davidson, P. A. & Dalziel, S. B. 2008 Structure formation in homogeneous freely decaying rotating turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 598, 81–105.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. & Zhou, Q. 2017 A multi-parameter criterion for layer formation in a stratified shear flow using sorted buoyancy coordinates. J. Fluid Mech. 823, R5.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2016 Layers and internal waves in uniformly stratified fluids stirred by vertical grids. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 380–413.Google Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 2000 Passive scalars in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 203–240.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T. & Gotoh, T. 2004 Statistics of a passive scalar in homogeneous turbulence. New J. Phys. 6 (40).Google Scholar
Yaglom, A. M. 1949 On the local structure of the temperature field in a turbulent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 69, 743–746.Google Scholar
Yeung, P. K., Xu, S. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2002 Schmidt number effects on turbulent transport with uniform mean scalar gradient. Phys. Fluids 14, 4178.Google Scholar