Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T23:09:49.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viscous and inviscid flows in a channel with a moving indentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

M. E. Ralph  and
T. J. Pedley
M. E. Ralph
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK Present address: Smith Associates Ltd., Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surry GU2 5YP, UK.
T. J. Pedley
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flow in a channel with an oscillating constriction has been studied by the numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations. A vorticity wave is found downstream of the constriction in both viscous and inviscid flow, whether the downstream flow rate is held constant and the upstream flow is pulsatile, or vice versa. Closed eddies are predicted to form between the crests/troughs of the wave and the walls, in the Euler solutions as well as the Navier-Stokes flows, although their structures are different in the two cases.

The positions of wave crests and troughs, as determined numerically, are compared with the predictions of a small-amplitude inviscid theory (Pedley & Stephanoff 1985). The theory agrees reasonably with the Euler equation predictions at small amplitude (ε [lsim ] 0.2) as long as the downstream flow rate is held fixed; otherwise a sinusoidal displacement is superimposed on the computed crest positions. At larger amplitude (ε = 0.38) the wave crests move downstream more rapidly than predicted by the theory, because of the rapid growth of the first eddy (‘eddy A’) attached to the downstream end of the constriction. At such larger amplitudes the Navier-Stokes predictions also agree well with the Euler predictions, when the downstream flow rate is held fixed, because the wave generation process is essentially inviscid and the undisturbed vorticity distribution is the same in each case. It is quite different, however, when the upstream flow rate is fixed, as in the experiments of Pedley & Stephanoff, because of differences in the undisturbed vorticity distribution, in the growth rate of the vorticity waves and in the dynamics of eddy A. A further finite-amplitude effect of importance, especially in an inviscid fluid, is the interaction of an eddy with its images in the channel walls.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 209 , December 1989 , pp. 543 - 566
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertram, C. D. & Pedley, T. J. 1983 Steady and unsteady separation in an approximately two-dimensional indented channel. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 315–345.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M., Davis, S. H., McMurray, J. T. & Orszag, S. A. 1984 On the stability of the decelerating laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 297–323.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Parker, K. H. 1976 The stability of the decaying flow in a suddenly blocked channel. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 305–314.Google Scholar
Myers, R. B., Taylor, T. D. & Murdock, J. J. 1981 Pseudo-spectral simulation of a two-dimensional vortex flow in a stratified, incompressible fluid. J. Comput. Phys. 43, 180–188.Google Scholar
Obremski, H. J., Morkovin, M. K. & Landahl, M. 1969 Portfolio of the stability characteristics of incompressible boundary layers. AGARDograph 134.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Stephanoff, K. D. 1985 Flow along a channel with a time-dependent indentation in one wall: the generation of vorticity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 160, 337–367 (referred to as II).Google Scholar
Ralph, M. E. & Pedley, T. J. 1988 Flow in a channel with a moving indentation. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 87–112 (referred to as III).Google Scholar
Roache, P. J. 1976 Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Hermosa.
Shapiro, M. A. & O'Brien, J. J. 1970 Boundary conditions for fine-mesh limited area forecasts. J. Appl. Met. 5, 345–349.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1979 The separating flow through a severely constricted symmetric tube. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 725–754.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. & Duck, P. W. 1980 On the severe non-symmetric constriction, curving or cornering of channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 727–753.Google Scholar
Sobey, I. J. 1980 On flow through furrowed channels. Part 1. Calculated flow patterns. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 1–26.Google Scholar
Sobey, I. J. 1983 The occurrence of separation in oscillatory flow. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 247–257.Google Scholar
Stephanoff, K. D., Pedley, T. J., Lawrence, C. J. & Secomb, T. W. 1983 Fluid flow along a channel with an asymmetric oscillating constriction. Nature 305, 692–695 (referred to as I).Google Scholar
Stern, M. E. & Pratt, L. J. 1985 Dynamics of vorticity fronts. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 513–532.Google Scholar