Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:04:54.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spin and angular momentum in gravity waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

M. S. Longuet-Higgins
M. S. Longuet-Higgins
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge, England, and Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The angular momentum A per unit horizontal distance of a train of periodic, progressive surface waves is a well-defined quantity, independent of the horizontal position of the origin of moment.

The Lagrangian-mean angular momentum $\overline{A}_L$ consists of two parts, arising from the orbital motion and from the Stokes drift respectively. Together these contribute a positive sum, nearly proportional to the energy density (when the origin is taken in the mean surface level). If moments are taken about some point P not at the mean surface level, the angular momentum will differ by an amount proportional to the elevation of P. There is just one elevation for which the Lagrangian-mean angular momentum about P vanishes. This elevation is called the level of action. For infinitesimal waves in deep water the level of action is at a height above the mean surface equal to ½k, that is ¼π times the wavelength.

Just as for ordinary fluid velocities, the Lagrangian-mean angular momentum $\overline{A}_L$ differs from the Eulerian-mean $\overline{A}_L$, the latter being zero to second order. The difference between $\overline{A}_L$ and $\overline{A}_E$ is associated with the displacement of the lateral boundaries of any given mass of fluid.

For waves of finite amplitude, an initially rectangular mass of fluid becomes ultimately quite distorted by the Stokes drift. Nevertheless it is possible to define a long-time average l.t.$\overline{A}$ and to calculate its numerical value accurately in waves of finite amplitude. In low waves, l.t.$\overline{A}$ is equal to $\overline{A}_L$. Defining the level of action ya in the general case as l.t.$\overline{A}/I$, where I is the linear momentum, we find that ya rises from 0·5k−1 for infinitesimal waves to about 0·6k−1 for steep waves. Thus ya is about the same as the height yx of the wave crests above the mean level in limiting waves, a fact which may account for why steep irrotational waves can support whitecaps in a quasi-steady state. The same argument suggests that Gerstner waves (in which the particle orbits are theoretically circular) could not support whitecaps.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , 11 March 1980 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banner, M. L. & Phillips, O. M. 1974 On small scale breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 647–657.Google Scholar
Cokelet, E. D. 1977 Steep gravity waves in water of arbitrary uniform depth. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 286, 183–230.Google Scholar
Hasselmann, K. 1963 On the non-linear transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. Part 2. Conservation theorems; wave-particle analogy; irreversibility. J. Fluid Mech. 15, 273–281.Google Scholar
Jones, W. L. 1973 Asymmetric wave-stress tensors and wave spin. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 737–747.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1929 Higher Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.
Levi-Cività, T. 1924 Questioni di Meccanica Classica e Relativista, II. Bologna: Lanichelli.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953a On the decrease of velocity with depth in an irrotational water wave. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49, 552–560.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953b Mass transport in water waves. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 245, 535–581.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1974 On the mass, momentum, energy and circulation of a solitary wave. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 337, 1–13.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1975 Integral properties of periodic gravity waves of finite amplitude. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 342, 157–174.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1978 Some new relations between Stokes's coefficients in the theory of gravity waves. J. Inst. Maths. Appl. 22, 261–273.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Fenton, J. D. 1974 On the mass, momentum, energy and circulation of a solitary wave II. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 340, 471–493.Google Scholar
Naeser, H. 1978 Why ripples become swells, and swells disappear rapidly. Proc. 5th Conf. of European Geophysical Soc., Strasbourg.
Rayleigh, Lord 1876 On waves. Phil. Mag. 1, 257–279.
Shuleikin, V. V. 1954 Dynamics of wind waves and dead swell. Izv. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. (Ser. Geofiz.) 5, 463–476.Google Scholar