Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T10:31:56.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some electrically driven flows in magnetohydrodynamics Part 2. Theory and experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

J. C. R. Hunt  and
D. G. Malcolm
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Central Electricity Research Laboratories, Leatherhead, Surrey
D. G. Malcolm
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Science, University of Warwick Now at: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this part we first extend the theory of part 1 to analyse the distribution of velocity and electric current in an electrically conducting liquid between two circular electrodes of finite diameter, when a current is passed between them. The electrodes are set opposite to each other in insulating planes and a magnetic field is applied perpendicular to these planes. When the Hartmann number M [Gt ] 1 we find that the current is confined to the cylinder of fluid joining the electrodes. This effect is accounted for by the velocity which is induced in thin layers of thickness O(M−½), at the circumference of the cylinder. In our analysis we concentrate on these interesting layers and, amongst other results, we find that in the limit M → ∞ the resistance of the fluid between the electrodes becomes that of the cylinder of fluid joining the electrodes.

We then describe some experiments to test the validity of this theory. In these experiments we measured, as a function of the magnetic field, (a) the potential difference between the copper electrodes, the fluid being mercury, (b) the electric potential distribution in the fluid between the disks and in the thin layers between the electrode edges, by means of an electric potential probe, and (c) the velocities induced in the layers using a Pilot tube. Our conclusions were: (i) the overall predictions of the theory were correct; (ii) the results of the two probes approximately correlated with each other, despite the theory still having some limitations and the behaviour of these probes still being somewhat uncertain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , 23 September 1968 , pp. 775 - 801
Copyright
© 1968 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branover, G. G. & Lielausis, O. A. 1962 Vopr. Magn. Gidro. Akad. Nauk. Latv. SSR., Riga, 2, 575–81.
East, D. 1964 The Pitot tube in magnetohydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Mass. Inst. Tech.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1967 Some aspects of magnetohydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University.
Hunt, J. C. R. & Stewartson, K. 1968 To be published.
Hunt, J. C. R. & Williams, W. E. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 31, 705.
Lecocq, P. 1964 Contribution à 1'étude des pertes de charge et profils de vitesse en écoulement turbulent en magnéto-hydrodynamique. Ph.D. Thesis, Toulouse.
Lehnert, B. 1956 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 233, 299.
Malcolm, D. G. 1968a Thermo-anemometry in magnetohydrodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick.
Malcolm, D. G. 1968b To be presented at the 6th Symposium of Magnetohydrodynamics, Inst. of Physics, Acad. of Sciences, Riga, Latvian SSR, Sept. 3–6.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 Proc. 11th Int. Cong. Appl. Mech., Munich, p. 946.
Moreau, R. 1966 C. R. Acad. Sci. 262, 259.