Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:53:22.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of non-uniqueness in the development of vortex breakdown in tubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Philip S. Beran
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
Fred E. C. Culick
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Center, Department of Aeronautics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Numerical solutions of viscous, swirling flows through circular pipes of constant radius and circular pipes with throats have been obtained. Solutions were computed for several values of vortex circulation, Reynolds number and throat/inlet area ratio, under the assumptions of steady flow, rotational symmetry and frictionless flow at the pipe wall. When the Reynolds number is sufficiently large, vortex breakdown occurs abruptly with increased circulation as a result of the existence of non-unique solutions. Solution paths for Reynolds numbers exceeding approximately 1000 are characterized by an ensemble of three inviscid flow types: columnar (for pipes of constant radius), soliton and wavetrain. Flows that are quasi-cylindrical and which do not exhibit vortex breakdown exist below a critical circulation, dependent on the Reynolds number and the throat/inlet area ratio. Wavetrain solutions are observed over a small range of circulation below the critical circulation, while above the critical value, wave solutions with large regions of reversed flow are found that are primarily solitary in nature. The quasi-cylindrical (QC) equations first fail near the critical value, in support of Hall's theory of vortex breakdown (1967). However, the QC equations are not found to be effective in predicting the spatial position of the breakdown structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. A., Tannehill, J. C. & Pletcher, R. H. 1984 Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. Hemisphere.
Benjamin, T. B. 1962 Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 593629.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1967 Some developments in the theory of vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 6584.Google Scholar
Beran, P. S. 1987 Numerical simulations of trailing vortex bursting. AIAA paper 87-1313.Google Scholar
Beran, P. S. 1989 An investigation of the bursting of trailing vortices using numerical simulation. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Bragg, S. L. & Hawthorne, W. R. 1950 Some exact solutions of the flow through annular cascade actuator discs. J. Aero. Sci. 17, 243249.Google Scholar
Brown, G. I. & Lopez, J. M. 1988 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown Part II: Physical mechanisms. Aero. Res. Lab. Aero. Rep. 174.Google Scholar
Escudier, M. P. 1984 Observations of the flow produced in a cylindrical container by a rotating endwall. Exps Fluids 2, 189196.Google Scholar
Faler, J. H. & Leibovich, S. 1977 Disrupted states of vortex flow and vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 20, 13851400.Google Scholar
Faler, J. H. & Leibovich, S. 1978 An experimental map of the internal structure of a vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 313335.Google Scholar
Grabowski, W. J. 1974 Solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for vortex breakdown. Berkeley Rep. FM-74-6.Google Scholar
Hafez, M., Ahmad, J., Kuruvila, G. & Salas, M. D. 1987 Vortex breakdown simulation. AIAA paper 87-1343.Google Scholar
Hafez, M., Kuruvila, G. & Salas, M. D. 1986 Numerical study of vortex breakdown. AIAA paper 86-0558.Google Scholar
Hall, J. L. 1985 An introduction to vortex breakdown and vortex core bursting. Natl Res. Council no. 24336.Google Scholar
Hall, M. G. 1967 A new approach to vortex breakdown. Proc. Heat Trans. Fluid Mech. Inst. pp. 319340.Google Scholar
Hall, M. G. 1972 Vortex breakdown. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 195218.Google Scholar
Keller, H. B. 1977 Numerical solution of bifurcation and nonlinear Eigenvalue problems. Applications of Bifurcation Theory, p. 359. Academic.
Kopecky, R. M. & Torrance, K. E. 1973 Initiation and structure of axisymmetric eddies in a rotating stream. Comput. Fluids, 1, 289.Google Scholar
Krause, E., Shi, X. G. & Hartwich, P. M. 1983 Computation of leading-edge vortices. AIAA paper 83-1907.Google Scholar
Lambourne, N. C. & Bryer, D. W. 1961 The bursting of leading-edge vortices — some observations and discussions of the phenomenon. Aero Res. Council RM-3282.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1978 The structure of vortex breakdown. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10, 221246.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1984 Vortex stability and breakdown: survey and extension. AIAA J. 22, 11921206.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1989 Vortex breakdown: a coherent transition trigger in concentrated vortices. Turbulence 89: Organized Structures and Turbulence in Fluid Mechanics. Kluwer.
Leibovich, S. & Kribus, A. 1990 Large-amplitude wavetrains and solitary waves in vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 459504.Google Scholar
Lopez, J. M. 1988 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown Part I: Confined swirling flow. Aero. Res. Lab. Aero. Rep. 173.Google Scholar
Lugt, H. J. & Abboud, M. 1987 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown with and without temperature effects in a container with a rotating lid. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 179200.Google Scholar
Menne, S. 1988 Vortex breakdown in an axisymmetric flow. AIAA paper 88-0506.Google Scholar
Salas, M. D. & Kuruvila, G. 1989 Vortex breakdown simulation: circumspect study of the steady, laminar, axisymmetric model. Comput. Fluids, 17, 247262.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1974 Effect of the adverse pressure gradient on vortex breakdown. AIAA J. 12, 602.Google Scholar
Táasan, S. 1986 Multigrid method for a vortex breakdown simulation. NASA Contractor Rep. 178106.Google Scholar
Trigub, V. N. 1985 The problem of breakdown of a line vortex. Prikl. Math. Mech, 49, 166171.Google Scholar