Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:48:37.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the spin-up of an electrically conducting fluid Part 1. The unsteady hydromagnetic Ekman-Hartmann boundary-layer problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Edward R. Benton  and
David E. Loper
Edward R. Benton
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
David E. Loper
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prototype spin-up problem between infinite flat plates treated by Greenspan & Howard (1963) is extended to include the presence of an imposed axial magnetic field. The fluid is homogeneous, viscous, and electrically conducting. The resulting boundary initial-value problem is solved to first order in Rossby number by Laplace transform techniques. In spite of the linearization the complete hydromagnetic interaction is preserved: currents affect the flow and the flow simultaneously distorts the field. In part 1, we analyze the impulsively started time dependent approach to a final steady Ekman–Hartmann boundary layer on a single insulating flat plate. The transient is found to consist of two diffusively growing boundary layers, inertial oscillations, and a weak Alfvén wave front. In part 2, these one plate results are utilized in discussing spin-up between two infinite flat insulating plates. Two distinct and important hydromagnetic spin-up mechanisms are elucidated. In all cases, the spin-up time is found to be shorter than in the corresponding non-magnetic problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , 27 November 1969 , pp. 561 - 586
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barcilon, V. & Pedlosky, J. 1967 Linear theory of rotating stratified fluid motions J. Fluid Mech. 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
Benton, E. R. 1966 On the flow due to a rotating disk J. Fluid Mech. 24, 781–800.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. A. & Foster, R. N. 1948 Fourier Integrals for Practical Applications. New York: Van Nostrand.
Doetsch, G. 1961 Guide to the Applications of Laplace Transforms. London: Van Nostrand.
Gilman, P. A. & Benton, E. R. 1968 Influence of an axial magnetic field on the steady linear Ekman boundary layer Phys. Fluids, 11, 2397–401.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. 1964 On the transient motion of a contained rotating fluid J. Fluid Mech. 20, 673–96.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. 1965 On the general theory of contained rotating fluid motions J. Fluid Mech. 22, 449–62.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. 1968 The Theory of Rotating Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Greenspan, H. P. & Howard, L. N. 1963 On a time dependent motion of a rotating fluid J. Fluid Mech. 17, 385–404.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Weinbaum, S. 1965 On non-linear spin-up of a rotating fluid J. Math. Phys. 44, 66–85.Google Scholar
Howard, L. N., Moore, D. W. & Spiegel, E. A. 1967 Solar spin-down problem Nature, Lond. 214, 1297–99.Google Scholar
Pedlosky, J. 1967 Spin-up of a stratified fluid J. Fluid Mech. 28, 463–80.Google Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1965 A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics. London: Pergamon.