Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:54:39.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the nonlinear reflection of a gravity wave at a critical level. Part 3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

S. N. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, London WC1
K. Stewartson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, London WC1

Abstract

In part 2 (Brown & Stewartson 1982) of this paper we set out the linearized solution of the critical layer that is expected to hold some time after the forced internal gravity wave of small amplitude e is initiated at an infinite distance above the shear layer. This differed from that presented in part 1 (Brown & Stewartson 1980) in that in part 2 we exploited to a much greater extent the fact that the Richardson number J was large and obtained the solution in a form consisting of explicit functions rather than infinite integrals. Also it was demonstrated that at times t = O(1) the wave did not penetrate beyond a certain level in the critical layer, and that critical-layer noise only was created above this line and transmitted below it. In this paper we examine the development of this solution on a longer time scale $\tau (\propto \epsilon^{\frac{2}{3}}t)$ and show how the reflection and transmission coefficients which are exponentially small, \[ O\{\exp(-(J-\frac{1}{4})^{\frac{1}{2}}\pi)\}, \] when τ = 0 increase with time. As in part 1 we obtain a reflection coefficient for the first harmonic that is O3), and because of the simpler formulation of the linearized solution are able to obtain a reflected second harmonic. These harmonics appear as complementary functions that are induced by singularities in the particular integrals of the equations. It is shown that the interaction between the initial-noise term in the lower part of the critical layer and an induced-noise term at the sixth stage of the expansion will eventually lead to a transmitted wave. This appears at the ninth stage of the expansion and its transmission coefficient is O12) though it is not explicitly calculated here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booker, J. R. & Bretherton, F. P. 1967 The critical layer for internal gravity waves in a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 513539.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1978 The evolution of a small inviscid disturbance to a marginally unstable stratified shear flow: stage two. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 363, 175194.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1980 On the nonlinear reflection of a gravity wave at a critical level. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 577595.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1982 On the nonlinear reflection of a gravity wave at a critical level. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 217230.Google Scholar
Geller, M. A., Tanaka, H. & Fritts, D. C. 1975 Production of turbulence in the vicinity of critical levels for internal gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 21252135.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1978 The evolution of the critical layer of a Rossby wave. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 9, 185200.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 1981 An experimental study of critical layers. J. Fluid Mech. 103, 321344.Google Scholar