Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:55:25.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A numerical study of the vorticity field generated by the baroclinic effect due to the propagation of a planar pressure wave through a cylindrical premixed laminar flame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

G. A. Batley
Affiliation:
Department of Fuel and Energy, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Department of Applied Mathematics, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
A. C. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Department of Fuel and Energy, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
J. Brindley
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
S. A. E. G. Falle
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Abstract

The importance of vorticity production in combustion systems has been highlighted previously by several authors (Markstein 1964; Picone et al. 1984). The consequent distortion and enlargement of flame surfaces can lead to substantial enhancement of the burning rate which may be beneficial or disastrous depending on the physical context. We describe the results of numerical simulations of an experimental configuration similar to that described by Scarinci & Thomas (1992), who examined the effect of initially planar pressure signals on two-dimensional flame balls. The flame ball is here set-up from ignition using a code, based on the second-order Godunov scheme described by Falle (1991). A simple Arrhenius reaction scheme is adopted in modelling a unimolecular decomposition. As in previous papers (Batley et al. 1993 a, b) the thermal conductivity is assumed to vary linearly with temperature, and the Lewis and Prandtl numbers are taken as unity. A short time after ignition, when the flame ball has reached a radius of approximately 2 cm, a very short-lengthscale pressure step disturbance is introduced, propagating towards the combustion region. As the signal crosses the flame, the interaction of the sharp, misaligned pressure and density gradients, creates a strong vorticity field. The resulting roll-up of the flame eventually divides it into two smaller rotating reacting regions. In order to gauge the effect of the chemical reaction and in particular the viscous diffusion on the evolution of the vorticity field, the results are compared with analogous solutions of the Euler equations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. 1985 A vortex method for flows with slight density variations. J. Comp. Phys. 61, 417144.Google Scholar
Batley, G. A. 1993 The interaction of pressure disturbances with premixed flames. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Batley, G. A., McIntosh, A. C. & Brindley, J. 1993a The time evolution of interactions between short length scale pressure disturbances and premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 92, 367388.Google Scholar
Batley, G. A., McIntosh, A. C. & Brindley, J. 1993b The evolution of premixed flame reaction zone structure under the influence of pressure fluctuations. Proc. Joint Meeting of the British and German Sections of The Combustion Institute March/April 1993. (ed. K. N. C. Bray et al.) pp. 311314.
Book, D. L., Boris, J. P., Kuhl, A. L., Oran, E. S., Picone, J. M. & Zalesak, S. T. 1981 Simulations of complex shock reflections from wedges in inert and reactive gas mixtures. In Proc. Seventh Intl Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, pp. 8490.
Chorin, A. J. & Bernard, P. S. 1973 Discretization of a vortex sheet, with an example of roll-up. J. Comput. Phys. 13, 423429.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. F. & McIntosh, A. C. 1984 Second order theory of unsteady burner-anchored flames with arbitrary Lewis number. Combust. Sci. Tech. 38, 161196.Google Scholar
Cloutman, L. D. & Wehner, M. F. 1992 Numerical simulation of Richtmeyer-Meshkov instabilities. Phys. Fluids A 4, 18211830.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1986 Basic theoretical nonlinear acoustics. Frontiers in Physical Acoustics. Soc. Italiana di Fisica. XCIII Corso..
Falle, S. A. E. G. 1991 Self-similar jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 250, 581596.Google Scholar
Krasny, R. 1986a A study of singularity formation in a vortex sheet by the point-vortex approximation. J. Fluid Mech. 167, 6593.Google Scholar
Krasny, R. 1986b Desingularization of periodic vortex sheet roll-up. J. Comput. Phys. 65, 292313.Google Scholar
Krasny, R. 1987 Computation of vortex sheet roll-up in the Trefftz plane. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 123155.Google Scholar
Markstein, G. H. 1964 Non-steady flame propagation. AGAR Dograph 75. Pergamon.
McIntosh, A. C. 1989 The interaction of high frequency low amplitude acoustic waves with premixed flames. In Nonlinear Waves in Active Media (ed. J. Engelbrecht), pp. 218231. Springer.
McIntosh, A. C. 1991 Pressure disturbances of different lengthscales interacting with conventional flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 75, 287309.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. 1993 The linearised response of the mass burning rate of a premixed flame to rapid pressure changes. Combust. Sci. Tech. 91, 329346.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C, Batley, G. A. & Brindley, J. 1993 Short length scale pressure pulse interactions with premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 91, 113.Google Scholar
Meiron, D. I., Baker, G. R. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Analytic structure of vortex sheet dynamics. Part 1. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 283298.Google Scholar
Oran, E. S. & Boris, J. P. 1979 Theoretical and computational approach to modeling flame ignition. US Naval Research Rep., NRL Mem. Rep. 4134.
Picone, J. M., Oran, E. S., Boris, J. P. & Young, T. R. 1984 Theory of Vorticity generation by shock wave and flame interactions. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut., Dynamics of Shock Waves, Explosions and Detonations, vol. 94, pp. 429448.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W., Simpson, J. E. & Stansby, P. K. 1987 The motion of a cylinder of fluid released from rest in a cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 307337.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W. & Stansby, P. K. 1993 On the ‘δ-equations’ for vortex sheet evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 527549.Google Scholar
Rosenhead, L. 1931 The formation of vortices from a surface of discontinuity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 134, 170192.Google Scholar
Scarinci, T. 1990 The generation of vorticity by shock waves in a reactive flow. B. Engng thesis McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Scarinci, T. & Thomas, G. O. 1992 Some experiments on shock-flame interaction. University College of Wales, Aberystwyth Rep. DET905.
Tryggvason, G., Dahm, W. J. A. & Sbeith, K. 1990 Fine structure of vortex sheet roll-up by viscous and inviscid simulation. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 113, 3136.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Non-linear Waves. Wiley.