Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:19:07.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mach reflection of a large-amplitude solitary wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Mitsuhiro Tanaka
Mitsuhiro Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-11 Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reflection of an obliquely incident solitary wave by a vertical wall is studied numerically by applying the ‘high-order spectral method’ developed by Dommermuth & Yue (1987). According to the analysis by Miles (1977a, b) which is valid when ai [Lt ] 1, the regular type of reflection gives way to ‘Mach reflection’ when ai/(3ai)½ ≤ 1, Where ai is the amplitude of the incident wave divided by the quiescent water depth d and ψi is the angle of incidence. In Mach reflection, the apex of the incident and the reflected waves moves away from the wall at a constant angle (ψ*, say), and is joined to the wall by a third solitary wave called ‘Mach stem’. Miles model predicts that the amplitude of Mach stem, and so the run-up at the wall, is 4ai when ψi = (3ai)½.

Our numerical results shows, however, that the effect of large amplitude tends to prevent the Mach reflection to occur. Even when the Mach reflection occurs, it is ‘contaminated’ by regular reflection in the sense that all the important quantities that characterize the reflection pattern, such as the stem angle ψ*, the angle of reflection ψr, and the amplitude of the reflected wave ar, are all shifted from the values predicted by Miles’ theory toward those corresponding to the regular reflection, i.e. ψ* = 0, ψr = ψi, and ar = ai. According to our calculations for ai = 0.3, the changeover from Mach reflection to regular reflection happens at ψi ≈ 37.8°, which is much smaller than (3ai)½ = 54.4°, and the highest Mach stem is observed for ψi = 35° (ψi/(3ai)½ = 0.644). Although the ‘four-fold amplification’ is not observed for any value of ψi considered here, it is found that the Mach stem can become higher than the highest two-dimensional steady solitary wave for the prescribed water depth. The numerical result is also compared with the analysis by Johnson (1982) for the oblique interaction between one large and one small solitary wave, which shows much better agreement with the numerical result than the Miles’ analysis does when ψi is sufficiently small and the Mach reflection occurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 248 , March 1993 , pp. 637 - 661
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byatt-Smith, J. G. B. 1988 The reflection of a solitary wave by a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 503– 521.Google Scholar
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics § 3.2, Springer.
Dommermuth, D. G. & Yue, D. K. P. 1987 A high-order spectral method for the study of nonlinear gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 267– 288.Google Scholar
Fenton, J. & Rienecker, M. M. 1982 A Fourier method for solving nonlinear water-wave problems: application to solitary-wave interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 411– 443.Google Scholar
Funakoshi, M. 1980 Reflection of obliquely incident solitary waves. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 49, 2371– 2379.Google Scholar
Funakoshi, M. 1981 On the time evolution of a solitary wave reflected by an oblique wall. Rep. Res. Inst. Appl. Mech. Kyushu University 24, 79– 93.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 1971 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 611– 622.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. S. 1982 On the oblique interaction of a large and a small solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 49– 70.Google Scholar
Kadomtsev, B. B. & Petviashivilli, V. I. 1970 On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersing media. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15, 539– 541.Google Scholar
Melville, W. K. 1980 On the Mach reflexion of a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 285– 297.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977a Obliquely interacting solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 157– 169.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1977b Resonantly interacting solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 171– 179.Google Scholar
Mirie, R. M. & Su, C. H. 1982 Collision between two solitary waves. Part 2. A numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 475– 492.Google Scholar
Su, C. H. & Mirie, R. M. 1980 On head-on collisions between two solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 509– 525.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. 1986 The stability of solitary waves. Phys. Fluids 29, 650– 655.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M. 1990 Application of the second-order mode coupling equation to coastal engineering problems. Proc. 22nd Conf. Coastal Engng, ASCE, ch. 67, pp. 881– 894.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., Dold, J. W., Lewy, M. & Peregrine, D. H. 1987 Instability and breaking of a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 235– 248.Google Scholar
Wiegel, R. L. 1964 Water wave equivalent of Mach reflection. Proc. 9th Conf. Coastal Engng, ASCE, ch. 6, pp. 82– 102.Google Scholar
Zufiria, J. A. & Saffman, P. G. 1986 The superharmonic instability of finite-amplitude surface waves on water of finite depth. Stud. Appl. Math. 74, 259– 266.Google Scholar