Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:45:53.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory experiments on counter-propagating collisions of solitary waves. Part 2. Flow field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Yongshuai Chen ,
Eugene Zhang  and
Harry Yeh
Yongshuai Chen
Affiliation:
School of Civil & Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Beijing Aeronautical Science & Technology Research Institute, Beijing, 100083, China
Eugene Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Harry Yeh*
Affiliation:
School of Civil & Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the companion paper (Chen & Yeh, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 749, 2014, pp. 577–596), collisions of counter-propagating solitary waves were studied experimentally by analysing the measured water-surface variations. Here we study the flow fields associated with the collisions. With the resolved velocity data obtained in the laboratory, the flow fields are analysed in terms of acceleration, vorticity, and velocity-gradient tensors in addition to the velocity field. The data show that flow acceleration becomes maximum slightly before and after the collision peak, not in accord with the linear theory which predicts the maximum acceleration at the collision peak. Visualized velocity-gradient-tensor fields show that fluid parcels are stretched vertically prior to reaching the state of maximum wave amplitude. After the collision peak, fluid parcels are stretched in the horizontal direction. The boundary-layer evolution based on the vorticity generation and diffusion processes are discussed. It is shown that flow separation occurs at the bed during the collision. The collision creates small dispersive trailing waves. The formation of the trailing waves is captured by observing the transition behaviour of the velocity-gradient-tensor field: the direction of stretching of fluid parcels alternates during the generation of the trailing waves.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer separation Waves/Free-surface Flows: Solitary waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Surface gravity waves
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 755 , 25 September 2014 , pp. 463 - 484
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, Y.2013 Experimental study of counter-propagating solitary wave collisions. PhD thesis, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Yeh, H. 2014 Laboratory experiments on counter-propagating solitary wave collisions. Part 1. Wave interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 749, 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W., Guyenne, P., Hammack, J., Henderson, D. & Sulem, C. 2006 Solitary water wave interactions. Phys. Fluids 18, 057106.Google Scholar
Delmarcelle, T. & Hesselink, L. 1993 Visualizing second-order tensor fields with hyperstreamlines. IEEE Comput. Graph. Applics. 13, 25–33.Google Scholar
Goring, D. & Raichlen, F.1980 The generation of long waves in the laboratory. In Proceedings 17th Intl Conference Coastal Engrs, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 1971 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 611–622.Google Scholar
Haller, G. 2004 Exact theory of unsteady separation for two-dimensional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 512, 257–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keulegan, G. H. 1948 Gradual damping of solitary waves. Natl Bur. Sci. J. Res. 40, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 Introduction: boundary layer theory. In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. Rosenhead, L.), pp. 46–113. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, C., Hsieh, S. C., Yu, S. M. & Raikar, R. V. 2010 Characteristics of boundary layer flow induced by a solitary wave. In Advances in Fluid Mechanics VIII (ed. Rahman, M. & Brebbia, C. A.), pp. 267–279. WIT Press.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. 2006 Turbulent boundary-layer effects on transient wave propagation in shallow water. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 462, 3431–3491.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Orfila, A. 2004 Viscous effects on transient long-wave propagation. J. Fluid Mech. 520, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F., Park, Y. S. & Cowen, E. A. 2007 Boundary layer flow and bed shear stress under a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 574, 449–464.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1983 The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves. John Wiley & Sons, 740 pp.Google Scholar
Sears, W. R. & Telionis, D. P. 1975 Boundary-layer separation in unsteady flow. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 28, 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, C. & Mirie, R. M. 1980 On head-on collisions between two solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 509–525.Google Scholar
Sumer, B. M., Jensen, P. M., Sørensen, L. B., Fredsøe, J., Liu, P. L.-F. & Carstensen, S. 2010 Coherent structures in wave boundary layers. Part 2. Solitary motion. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 207–231.Google Scholar
Umeyama, M. 2013 Investigation of single and multiple solitary waves using superresolution PIV. ASCE J. Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Engng 139, 304–313.Google Scholar
Vittori, G. & Blondeaux, P. 2008 Turbulent boundary layer under a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 433–443.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C. 1977 Incompressible boundary layer separation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, E., Yeh, H., Lin, Z. & Laramee, R. S. 2009 Asymmetric tensor analysis for flow visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 15, 106–122.Google Scholar
Zheng, X. & Pang, A. 2005 2D asymmetric tensor fields. In Proceedings 16th IEEE Conference Visualization, Vis’05, pp. 3–10. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar