Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:20:19.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the singularity at separation removable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

K. Stewartson
K. Stewartson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many numerical integrations support Goldstein's theory of the structure of the solution of a laminar boundary layer near the point of separation O when the mainstream is prescribed, and in particular confirm that the solution is singular there. The existence of the singularity, however, implies that the hypotheses of the boundary layer break down in the neighbourhood of O, and it has been suggested that the disturbance to the mainstream near O is sufficient to smooth out the singularity and enable the solution to pass over into another conventional boundary layer downstream of O containing a region of reversed flow. The aim of this paper is to explore this possibility in detail using the methods of the triple-deck, developed by the author and others, which have proved successful in somewhat related problems.

Granted the hypothesis that the interaction between the boundary layer and the mainstream is significant near separation and manifests itself through a triple deck, it is found that its streamwise extent is O(ε2l) where ε−8 is a characteristic Reynolds number, ε [Lt ] 1, and l a characteristic length of the problem. The upper deck is of width O(ε2l), lies entirely outside the boundary layer, and in it the flow is inviscid. The main deck is of width O(ε4l) and constitutes the majority of the boundary layer near O, and the perturbations in the velocity are largely inviscid. Finally, the lower deck is of lateral extent $O(\epsilon^{\frac{9}{2}}l)$ and is controlled by a linear equation of boundary-layer type. The whole structure is found to be consistent provided a certain integro-differential equation can be solved, which takes different forms according as the mainstream is supersonic or subsonic. When the mainstream is subsonic it is found that there is no solution to this equation that is sufficiently smooth on the downstream side of the triple deck. When the mainstream is supersonic it is found that the triple deck can at best postpone the breakdown of the assumed structure which still must occur within a distance O(ε2l) of O.

It is concluded that the singularity is not removable by the methods proposed and it is inferred that the singularity is a real phenomenon terminating the flow which, at high Reynolds number, exists upstream of O.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , 11 November 1970 , pp. 347 - 364
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1969 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 4
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 42, 56.
Catherall, D. & Mangler, K. W. 1966 J. Fluid Mech. 26, 16.
Goldstein, S. 1930 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 26, 1.
Goldstein, S. 1948 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1, 4.
Howarth, L. 1938 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 164, 54.
Jones, C. W. 1948 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1, 38.
Merkin, J. H. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 35, 43.
Messiter, A. F. 1970 S.I.A.M. J. Appl. Math. 18, 24.
Stewartson, K. 1958 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 11, 39.
Stewartson, K. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 12, 1.
Stewartson, K. 1969 Mathematika, 16, 106.
Stewartson, K. 1970 To appear in Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Williams, P. G. 1969 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 312, 181.
Terrill, R. 1960 Phil. Trans. A 253, 15.