Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:44:20.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Droplet motion induced by weak shock waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

Samuel Temkin  and
Sung Soo Kim
Samuel Temkin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Sung Soo Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 Present address: Ingersoll Rand Research, Princeton, N.J.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental study of the motion of small water droplets in a shock tube is reported. Droplet displacement data were obtained by means of reflected-light stroboscopic illumination for droplet diameters in the range 87–575 μm, and for shock strengths, ΔP/P1, in the range 0·0018–0·3. The displacement data are fitted by means of best-fit polynomials in time, which are used to compute droplet velocities, accelerations, and drag coefficients. All of our drag coefficient data have values which are larger than the steady drag at the same Reynolds numbers. The differences are attributed to time changes of the relative fluid velocity Ur. This may affect the size of the recirculating region and, therefore, the drag. In particular, it is argued that the drag is larger or smaller than the steady drag, depending on whether the dUr/dt is negative or positive, respectively. Our experiments, which were performed for dUr/dt < 0, confirm this expectation. Furthermore, it is shown that the difference between steady and transient drag coefficients, at the same Reynolds number, depends only on the value of a parameter A = (ρp/ρ0−1)(D/U2r)(dUr/dt). Here ρp and ρ0 are the densities of the droplets and of the surrounding gas, respectively, and D is the droplet diameter. In fact, in the Reynolds number range 3·2 < Re < 77, where multiple data are available having the same value of Re but having different values of A, the drag data can be expressed as CD = CDS(Re) – KA, where CDS(Re) is the steady drag at the instantaneous Reynolds number Re, and K is a constant of order 1.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , 16 January 1980 , pp. 133 - 157
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, J. R., Cataneo, R. & Semonin, R. G. 1971 The production of equal and unequal size droplet pairs. Rev. Sci. Instr. 42, 1847–1849.Google Scholar
Beard, K. V. & Pruppacher, H. R. 1969 A determination of the terminal velocity and drag of small water drops by means of a wind tunnel. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 1066–1072.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. C. R. & Walker, J. D. A. 1971 The initial flow past an impulsively started sphere at high Reynolds numbers. J. Engng Math. 5, 263–278.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. C. R. & Walker, J. D. A. 1972 Numerical solutions for time-dependent flow past an impulsively started sphere. Phys. Fluids 15, 517–525.Google Scholar
Hanson, A. R., Domich, E. G. & Adams, H. S. 1963 Shock tube investigation of the breakup of drops by air blasts. Phys. Fluids 6, 1070–1080.Google Scholar
Hill, M. K. 1973 Behavior of spherical particles at low Reynolds numbers in a fluctuating translational flow. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Hoglund, R. F. 1962 Recent advances in gas particle nozzle flows. J. Am. Rocket Soc. 32, 662–671.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. R. & Gilliland, E. R. 1952 The mechanics of drops. Chem. Engng Prog. 48, 497–504.Google Scholar
Ingebo, R. D. 1956 Drag coefficients for droplets and solid spheres in clouds accelerating in air streams. N.A.C.A. Tech. note TN 3762.Google Scholar
Karanfilian, S. K. & Kotas, T. J. 1978 Drag on a sphere in unsteady motion in a liquid at rest. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 85–96.Google Scholar
Keller, J., Rubinow, S. I. & Tu, Y. O. 1973 Spatial instability of a jet. Phys. Fluids 16, 2052–2055.Google Scholar
Kim, S. S. 1977 An experimental study of droplet response to weak shock waves. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Langmuir, I. 1948 The production of rain by a chain-reaction in cumulus clouds at temperatures above freezing. J. Met. 5, 175–192.Google Scholar
Lunnon, R. G. 1926 Fluid resistance to moving spheres. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 110, 302–326.Google Scholar
Marble, F. E. 1963 Nozzle contours for minimum particle-lag loss. A.I.A.A. J. 1, 2793–2801.Google Scholar
Mason, B. J. 1971 The Physics of Clouds. Oxford University Press.
Morsi, S. A. & Alexander, A. J. 1972 An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 193–208.Google Scholar
Nakamura, I. 1976 Steady wake behind a sphere. Phys. Fluids 19, 5–8.Google Scholar
Ockendon, J. R. 1968 The unsteady motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 34, 229–239.Google Scholar
Odar, F. & Hamilton, W. S. 1964 Forces on a sphere accelerating in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 302–314.Google Scholar
Pearcey, T. & Hill, G. W. 1956 The accelerated motion of droplets and bubbles. Austr. J. Phys. 9, 19–30.Google Scholar
Pruppacher, H. R., Le Clair, B. P. & Hamielec, A. E. 1970 Some relations between drag and flow pattern of viscous flow past a sphere and a cylinder at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichman, J. M. 1973 A study of the motion, deformation and breakup of accelerating water droplets. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University.
Reichman, J. M. & Temkin, S. 1974 A study of the deformation and breakup of accelerating water droplets. Proc. Int. Coll. on Drops and Bubbles, 28–30 August, Pasadena, California, pp. 446–464.
Rimon, Y. & Cheng, S. I. 1969 Numerical solution of a uniform flow over a sphere at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 12, 949–959.Google Scholar
Roos, F. W. & Willmarth, W. W. 1971 Some experimental results on sphere and disk drag. A.I.A.A. J. 9, 285–291.Google Scholar
Rudinger, G. 1969 Effective drag coefficients for gas-particle flow in shock tubes. Proj. Squid Tech. Rep. CAL-97-PU.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. & Turner, J. S. 1956 On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 16–30.Google Scholar
Selberg, B. P. & Nicholls, J. A. 1968 Drag coefficient of small spherical particles. A.I.A.A. J. 6, 401–408.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. 1970 Droplet agglomeration induced by weak shock waves. Phys. Fluids 13, 1639–1641.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. 1972 On the response of a sphere to an acoustic pulse. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 339–349.Google Scholar
Temkin, S. & Reichman, J. M. 1972 A new technique to photograph small particles in motion. Rev. Sci. Instr. 43, 1456–1459.Google Scholar
Torobin, L. B. & Gauvin, W. H. 1959 Fundamental aspects of solids-gas flows. III. Accelerated motion of a particle in a fluid. Can. J. Chem. Engng 37, 224–236.Google Scholar