Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:40:41.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contributions to the theory of the Pitot-tube displacement effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

M. J. Lighthill
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester

Abstract

In an earlier paper the uniform shear flow past a sphere was studied, by investigating how vortex lines are deformed by the ‘primary flow’ (flow in the absence of shear), and deducing the ‘secondary’ vorticity field (first approximation for small shear). In another paper the image system associated with each element of secondary vorticity was found, whence the Biot-Savart law can be used to determine the secondary flow field by integration. The integration is here carried out for the ‘downwash’ (secondary flow component perpendicular to the undisturbed flow, down the velocity gradient) on the dividing streamline. Difficulties due to the infinite domain of integration and singularities of the integrand are overcome by selecting variables of integration carefully and using known analytical properties of the secondary vorticity. From the computation of downwash is inferred the first approximation (for small shear A) to the ‘displacement’ δ (displacement of the dividing streamline, up the velocity gradient, far upstream of the sphere). If U is the upstream flow velocity and a the radius of the sphere, the computed value of lim (Uδ/Aa2) is 0·9. $A \rightarrow 0$ Details of the calculation show that the secondary trailing vorticity is not an important contributor to the displacement, The downwash is due almost entirely to vorticity upstream of the sphere (Hall's earlier simplified theory gave good results, e.g., 1.24 instead of 0.9, because it concentrated on the effect of local vorticity in producing downwash); further, this produces displacement principally through its image vorticity.

The relation between theories for a sphere and experimental results on Pitot tubes (beginning with Young & Maas 1936) is discussed. Theoretical evidence on tertiary- and quartary-flow effects is used here in the light of recent work which renders the successive-approximation sequence uniformly valid at infinity. The conclusion is that the theories, taken together, are not inconsistent with the experimental evidence that (i) at values of the ‘shear parameter’ Aa/U at which the displacement is measurable the ratio δ/a seems to have asymptoted to an approximately constant value, and (ii) displacement is greatly reduced in supersonic flow (Johannesen & Mair 1952) or when ‘sharp-lipped’ tubes are used (Livesey 1956).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1957 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cuming, H. G. 1951 The secondary flow of a viscous incompressible fluid in motion through curved pipes, Aero. Res. Counc., Lond., Rep. no. 13979.Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. 1927 Phil. Mag. (7), 4, 208.
Dean, W. R. 1928 Phil. Mag. (7), 5, 673.
Goldstein, S. (Ed.) 1938 Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
Hall, I. M. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 142 (referred to in the text as H).
Hawthorne, W. R. 1951 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 206, 374.
Hawthorne, W. R. 1954 J. Aero. Sci. 21, 588.
Hawthorne, W. R. & Martin, Moira E. 1955 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 232, 184.
Johannesen, N. H. & Mair, W. A. 1952 J. Aero. Sci. 19, 785.
Lighthill, M. J. 1956a Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 52, 317 (referred to in the text as I).
Lighthill, M. J. 1956b J. Fluid Mech. 1, 31. These two papers are referred to collectively in the text as D.
Lighthill, M. J. 1957a J. Fluid Mech. 2, 311. These two papers are referred to collectively in the text as D.
Lighthill, M. J. 1957b J. Fluid Mech. 2 (in the press).
Livesey, J. L. 1956 J. Aero. Sci. 23, 949.
Macmillan, F. A. 1956 Experiments on pitot tubes in shear flow, Aero. Res. Counc., Lond., Rep. no. 18235.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. R. & Murray, J. D. 1955 Z. angew. Math. Phys. 6, 223.
Preston, J. H. 1954 Aero. Quart. 5, 218.
Squire, H. B. & Winter, K. G. 1951 J. Aero. Sci. 18, 271.
Young, A. D. & Maas, J. N. 1936 Aero. Res. Counc., Lond., Rep. & Mem. no. 1770.