Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T04:09:08.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Axisymmetric rotating flow past a circular disk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

John W. Miles
John W. Miles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, La Jolla
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The steady, inviscid, axisymmetric, rotating flow past a circular disk in an unbounded liquid is determined on the hypothesis that all streamlines originate in a uniform flow far upstream of the body. The characteristic parameter for the flow is k = 2ωa/U, where ω and U are the angular and axial velocities of the basic flow and α is the radius of the disk. Forward separation is found to occur for k > k = 1.9, in agreement with observation (Orloff & Bossel 1971). The length of the upstream separation bubble is determined on the hypothesis that the previous solution remains valid for k > k, despite the existence of closed streamlines within the upstream separation bubble (which may, but do not necessarily, inva,lidate the solution). This length increases rapidly for k > 3, in qualitative agreement with observation. The hypothesis of unseparated flow implies a singularity at the rim of the disk, just as in potential flow. The strength of this singularity departs only slightly from its potential-flow value for 0 ≤ k ≤ 2, but increases rapidly with k for k > 3, which suggests that (quite apart from the difficulties implied by the existence of closed streamlines) the solution cannot remain valid for sufficiently large k.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , 27 June 1972 , pp. 689 - 700
Copyright
© 1972 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynumim. Cambridge University Press.
Benjamin, T. B. 1970 Upstream influence. J. Fluid Mech., 40, 49–79.Google Scholar
Flammer, C. 1957 Spheroidal Wave Functions. Stanford University Press.
Greenspan, H. P. 1968 The Theory of Rotating Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Maxworthy, T. 1970 The flow created by a sphere moving along the axis of a rotating, slightly viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech., 40, 453–480.Google Scholar
Mcintyre, M.E. 1972 On Long's hypothesis of no upstream influence in uniformly stratified or rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech., 52, 209–243.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1968 Lee waves in stratified flow. Part 1. Thin barrier. J. Fluid Mech., 32, 549–568.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1969a The lee-wave regime for a slender body in a rotating flow. J. Pluid Mech., 36, 261–288.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1969b Transient motion of a dipole in a rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech., 39, 433–442.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1970 The oseenlet as a model for separated flow in a rotating viscous liquid. J. Fluid Mech., 42, 207–217.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1971 Boundary-layer separation in a rotating flow. J. Pluid Mech., 45, 513–526.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1972 Upstream influence of a dipole in a rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech. to appear.Google Scholar
Orloff, K. & Bossel, H. 1971 Laser-Doppler velocity measurements of swirling flows with upstream influence. Bull. Am. Phyys. Soc., 16 (2), 1331 (abstract only).Google Scholar
Pritchard, W. 1969 The motion generated by an obstacle moving along the axis of a uniformly rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech., 39, 443–464.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1968 On inviscid flow of a rotating fluid past an axially symmetric body using Oseen's equations. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 21, 353–373.Google Scholar
Trustrum, K. 1971 An Oseen model of the two-dimensional flow of a stratified fluid over an obstacle. J. Fluid Mech., 50, 177–188.Google Scholar