Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:06:58.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ruin Considerations and Debt Issuance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The current literature or business finance states that debt is a cheaper source of capital than stock (tending to reduce the firm's cost of capital), because interest is deductible for income tax purposes while the return to common stockholders is subject to tax. It is even possible to issue debt without increasing the risk to the owners (the debt is issued to stockholders in proportion to the ownership of stock, or equivalently investors buy a mixture of stocks and bonds on the market). However, it is argued in this paper that if we assume that the present stockholders have no further resources available for investment in the firm, but the enterprise needs additional resources, then the present stockholders have to make a basic decision about whether to issue stock or debt to raise the additional needed capital. The issuance of debt in this situation increases risk, and the issuance of stock dilutes ownership. Even when bondholders require a much lower contractual return than the expected annual return of stockholders, the issuance of more stock may be preferred to the issuance of debt.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baumol, W. J., and Malkiel, B. G.. “The Firm's Optimal Debt-Equity Combination and the Cost of Capital.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1967, pp. 547578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Baxter, N. D. “Leverage, Risk of Ruin and the Cost of Capital.” The Journal of Finance, September 1967, pp. 395403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Feller, W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Application. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[4]Howard, R. A.Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1960.Google Scholar
[5]Shubik, M., and Thompson, G.. “Games of Economic Survival.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, June 1959, pp. 111123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Solomon, E.The Theory of Financial Management. Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar