Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T04:43:27.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance Evaluation of New York Stock Exchange Specialists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Amir Barnea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study's purpose was to construct a performance criterion for New York Stock Exchange specialists which relates to their ability to affect price variability. It was emphasized that the price-setting behavior of the specialists, at times when trading imbalances prevail in the market, is the most important aspect of their performance. Their performance in this dimension may or may not be associated with their willingness to supply immediacy services to small orders. While the bid-ask spread is the correct variable to measure when the latter is considered, price variability or, more precisely, the functional relationship between price changes and trading imbalances is the variable to be measured when the price-setting behavior is of interest. While the experiment to evaluate the price-setting behavior of NYSE specialists using publicly available data may be considered a pioneer study, other studies have estimated the determinants of the bid-ask spread. The contributions of this study to the analysis of the spread can be summarized as follows: (a) observing an independent “specialist effect” on the size of the spread, (b) estimating the spread-volume relationships using a simultaneous system, and (c) estimating the association between the specialists' performance on both spread and price dimensions of their activity. The finding of this study is that there is a positive correlation between the quality measure of performance on both dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , September 1974 , pp. 511 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bagehot, W. “The Only Game in Town.” Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 27 (March–April 1971), pp. 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barnea, A. “An Analysis and Evaluation of the Specialist System on the New York Stock Exchange.” Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1972.Google Scholar
[3]Barnea, A., and Dowries, D.. “A Reexamination of the Empirical Distribution of Stock Price Changes.” Journal of the American Statistical Association (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[4]Barnea, A., and Logue, D.. “The Effect of Risk on the Market-Maker Spread.”Google Scholar
[5]Brada, J.; Ernst, H.; and Van Tassel, J.. “The Distribution of Stock Price Differences; Gaussian After All?” Operation Research, vol. 14 (March–April 1966), pp. 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cochran, W.Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1953.Google Scholar
[7]Crouch, R. “The Volume of Transactions and Price Changes on the New York Stock Exchange.” Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 26 (July–August 1970), pp. 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Demsetz, H. “The Cost of Transacting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 82 (1968), pp. 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fama, E.F. “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business, vol. 38 (1965), pp. 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fama, E.F., and Roll, R.. “Parameter Estimates for Symmetric Stable Distributions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 66 (1971), pp. 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Feller, W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971.Google Scholar
[12]Fitch, F.E., Inc. Stock Quotations on the New York Stock Exchange. New York, January 15, 1968–September 15, 1969.Google Scholar
[13]Granger, C.W.S., and Morgenstern, O.. Predictability of Stock Market Prices. Lexington, Mass: Heath Lexington Books, 1970.Google Scholar
[14]Institutional Investor Study of the SEC. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.Google Scholar
[15]Johnston, J.Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Co., 1963.Google Scholar
[16]Mandelbrot, B. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” Journal of Business, vol. 36 (October 1963), pp. 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Inc. Security Risk Evaluations. June 1971.Google Scholar
[18]Mood, A., and Graybill, F.A.. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Co., 1963.Google Scholar
[19]Morrison, D.Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Co., 1967.Google Scholar
[20]Roll, R. “Evidence on the Growth-Optimum Model.” Carnegie-Mellon Working Paper, 3–71–2, April 1972.Google Scholar
[21]Siegel, S.Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1956.Google Scholar
[22]Smidt, S. “Which Road to an Efficient Stock Market: Free Competition or Regulated Monopoly?” Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 27 (1971), pp. 18–20, pp. 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Tinic, S.M.E. “The Value of Time Preferences and the Behavior of Liquidity Costs in New York Stock Exchange.” Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1970.Google Scholar
[24]West, R., and Tinic, S.. The Economics of the Stock Market. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
[25]West, R., and Tinic, S.. “Competition and the Pricing of Dealer Service in Over-the-Counter Stock Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 7 (June 1972), pp. 1707–1729.Google Scholar