Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:27:31.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information, Investment Behavior, and Efficient Portfolios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

David P. Baron
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to indicate that the opportunity to obtain information regarding the probability distribution of the return on a risky asset, such as a portfolio or a mutual fund, may cause a risk-averse decision maker to accept a single-period actuarially unfair gamble. This behavior is the same as that implied by utility functions that have convex segments, as originally considered by Friedman and Savage [2] and by Markowitz [12], but the utility function derived is not convex on any interval, since it is the envelope of a finite set of strictly increasing, strictly concave functions. Similar utility functions have been obtained, by Fleming [1] because of transactions costs, by Hakansson [4] by imposing a borrowing restriction on an investment-consumption model, and by Masson [14] in the context of an imperfect capital market. In this paper acceptance of single-period actuarially unfair gambles by an individual risk averse with respect to future wealth levels results from the opportunity to acquire information. The acquisition of information creates a set of conditional decisions each of which the individual may treat in an optimal manner, and that set of conditional decisions may induce risk-taking behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , September 1974 , pp. 555 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Fleming, J.S. “The Utility of Wealth and the Utility of Windfalls.” Review of Economics Studies, vol. 36, no. 105 (January 1969), pp. 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Friedman, M., and Savage, L.. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 56 (August 1948), pp. 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hadar, J., and Russell, W.R.. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review, vol. 49 (March 1969), pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
[4]Hakansson, Nils H. “Friedman-Savage Utility Functions Consistent with Risk Aversion.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84 (August 1970), pp. 472–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hanoch, G., and Levy, H.. “The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36 (July 1969), pp. 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hirshleifer, Jack. “The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity.” American Economic Review, vol. 61 (September 1971), pp. 561–574.Google Scholar
[7]Iglehart, D.L. “Capital Accumulation and Production: Optimal Dynamic Policies.” Management Science, vol. 12 (1965), pp. 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jensen, M.C. “The Foundations and Current State of Capital Market Theory.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, M.C.. Praeger, 1972.Google Scholar
[9]Levy, H., and Hanoch, G.. “Relative Effectiveness of Efficiency Criteria for Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (March 1970), pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
[10]Levy, H., and Sarnat, M.. “Alternative Efficiency Criteria: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, vol. 25 (December 1970), pp. 1153–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Markowitz, Harry M. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, vol. 7 (March 1952), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
[12]Markowitz, Harry M. “The Utility of Wealth.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 60, no. 2 (April 1952), pp. 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Markowitz, Harry M.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
[14]Masson, Robert T. “The Creation of Risk Aversion by Imperfect Capital Markets.” American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 1 (March 1972), pp. 77–86.Google Scholar
[15]Mossin, Jan. “Optimal Multiperiod Portfolio Policies.” Journal of Business, vol. 41 (April 1968), pp. 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Porter, R.B. “A Comprehensive Empirical Comparison of Stochastic Dominance and Mean-Variance Portfolio Models.” Working Paper No. 52, School of Business, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
[17]Porter, R. Burr, and Gaumnitz, Jack E.. “Stochastic Dominance versus Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis: An Empirical Evaluation.” American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 3 (June 1972), pp. 438–446.Google Scholar
[18]Raiffa, Howard. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
[19]Whitmore, G.A. “Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance.” American Economic Review, vol. 60 (June 1970), pp. 457–459.Google Scholar