Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:57:46.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Full Transparency of Politicians' Actions Does Not Increase the Quality of Political Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2014

David Stadelmann ,
Marco Portmann  and
Reiner Eichenberger
David Stadelmann
Affiliation:
University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, Bayreuth, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Südstrasse 11, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland
Marco Portmann
Affiliation:
University of Fribourg, Bd. de Pérolles 90, Fribourg, Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Reiner Eichenberger
Affiliation:
CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Südstrasse 11, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland University of Fribourg, Bd. de Pérolles 90, Fribourg, Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identify the impact of transparency in political decision-making on the quality of political representation with a difference-in-difference strategy. The quality of political representation is measured by the observed divergence of parliamentary decisions from revealed voter preferences on identical issues. We show that full transparency of votes of individual politicians does not decrease divergence from voter preferences.

Keywords

Transparencyquality of political decisionsrepresentationparliamentindividual votesreferenda
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 16 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carey, J. M. 2008. Legislative Voting and Accountability (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. M. and Hix, S. 2013. District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority's Preferences: A Comment and Reinterpretation. Public Choice 154 (1–2): 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. 2007. Government Transparency and Policymaking. Public Choice 131 (1–2): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. 1994. Direct Democracy: Politico-Economic Lessons from Swiss Experience. American Economic Review 84 (2): 338–42.Google Scholar
Garrett, T. A. 1999. A Test of Shirking Under Legislative and Citizen Vote: The Case of State Lottery Adoption. Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1): 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, M. and Stramski, J. 2010. Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersch, P. L. and McDougall, G. S. 1988. Voting for ‘Sin’ in Kansas. Public Choice 57 (2): 127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G. 2010. Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmann, M., Stadelmann, D. and Eichenberger, R. 2012. District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority's Preferences: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Popular and Parliamentary Votes. Public Choice 151 (3–4): 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prat, A. 2005. The Wrong Kind of Transparency. American Economic Review 95 (3): 862–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F., Pommerehne, W. W. and Frey, B. S. 1981. Politico-Economic Interdependence in a Direct Democracy: The Case of Switzerland. In Contemporary Political Economy: Studies on the Interdependence of Politics and Economics (pp. 231–248). Hibbs, Douglas A. and Fassbender, Heino, eds., Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.Google Scholar
Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M. and Eichenberger, R. 2013a. Quantifying Parliamentary Representation of Constituents’ Preferences with Quasi-Experimental Data. Journal of Comparative Economics 41 (1): 170–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadelmann, D., Portmann, M. and Eichenberger, R. 2013b Voters Elect Politicians Who Closely Matched Their Preferences. Economics Bulletin 33 (2): 1001–9.Google Scholar
Stutzer, A. and Zehnder, M. 2013. Is Camera Surveillance an Effective Measure of Counterterrorism? Defence and Peace Economics 24 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar