Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:58:51.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Honorary males’ or women of substance? Gender, status, and power in Iron-Age Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Bettina Arnold
Bettina Arnold*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA
Get access

Extract

There are three sources of information regarding the social, political, and economic status of women in the European Iron Age, and all three are problematic. First, there are the classical sources, which describe Celtic society from the ‘civilised’ Mediterranean perspective, whether Greek or Roman. These often tell us more about the observer's culture than about the Celtic societies being described. Second, there are the insular Celtic laws and legends, which are compromised by time, distance, and the transformative effects of Christianity. Third, there is the archaeological record, which can only produce answers if the questions asked are the right ones, and is often seriously flawed with respect to preservation and recovery. Unfortunately, archaeologists are still some way from developing a methodology of reconstructing gender roles on the basis of excavated material culture remains. I would like to discuss an archaeological example which may provide some useful guidelines for generating such a methodology, with reference to all three of the sources mentioned above. The approach presented here makes use of written, ethnographic, and archaeological sources in a way that is not always possible in all research contexts. However, there have been a few recent attempts at such a synthesis (Claassen 1992; Spector 1993; Robb 1994), which suggest that a partnership between the written, ethnographic, and archaeological records regarding the subject of gender yields more than any of these sources of information alone can produce. Where such complementary data sets exist they should be made to work in tandem, as this discussion will show.

The study of prehistoric Europe continues to be simplified in favour of a male-dominated world view. The interpretation of high-status female burials has been particularly plagued by gender bias, since such graves imply that women in these societies may have achieved positions of social and economic power. Changing burial customs and grave-good inventories, as well as documentary evidence from the Mediterranean, indicates that gender relations were affected in significant ways during the early Iron Age. The social changes that accompanied the late-Hallstatt/early-La-Tène transition cannot be understood without reference to gender, as the paper tries to show.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 153 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, Kurt W., Munz, Martina, and Vach, Werner, 1995. Hallstattzeitliche Grabhügel im Spiegel ihrer biologischen und sozialen Strukturen am Beispiel des Hügelgräberfeldes von Dattingen, Kr. Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald. Germania 73 (2): 281–316.Google Scholar
Anthony, David, 1990. Migration in archaeology: The baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92 (4): 895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Bettina, 1991a. The Material Culture of Social Structure: Rank and Status in Early Iron Age Europe. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Arnold, Bettina, 1991b. The deposed ‘princess of Vix’: the need for an engendered European prehistory. In Walde, D. and Willows, N. (eds), The Archaeology of Gender. 366–374. Calgary: University of Calgary (Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference).Google Scholar
Arnold, Bettina, 1996 (in press). Cups of bronze and gold: drinking equipment and status in early Iron Age Europe. In Meyer, D. and Dawson, P. (eds), Debating Complexity: 366–374. Calgary: University of Calgary (Proceedings of the 26th Annual Chacmool Conference).Google Scholar
Arnold, Bettina and Murray, M. n.d. ‘Put out the geese, the Celts are coming!’ Iron Age migration and social change in central Europe. In Kahn, J. and Allum, C. (eds), Ancient Travelers. Calgary: University of Calgary (Proceedings of the 1994 Chacmool Conference).Google Scholar
Biel, Jörg, 1981. Tracht und Bewaffnung. In Bittel, K., Kimmig, W. and Schiek, S. (eds), Die Kelten in Baden-Württemberg: 138–159. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Biel, Jörg, 1985. Der frühkeltische Fürstengrabhügel von Hochdorf. Der Keltenfürst von Hochdorf. 32–51. Stuttgart: Landesdenkmalamt.Google Scholar
Bittel, Kurt, Kimmig, Wolfgang, and Schiek, Siegwalt (eds), 1981. Die Kelten in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Charpy, Jean-Jacques, 1991. The Champagne region under Celtic rule during the fourth and third centuries BC. In Moscati, S. M., Frey, O. H., Kruta, V., Raftery, B., Szabó, M. (eds), The Celts: 243–250. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Claassen, Cheryl (ed.), 1992. Exploring Gender through Archaeology. Madison: Prehistory Press (Monographs in World Archaeology 11).Google Scholar
Davies, Wendy, 1983. Celtic women in the early Middle Ages. In Cameron, Avril and Kuhrt, A. (eds), Images of Women in Antiquity. Detroit: Wayne State University.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael, 1990. Driven by drink: the role of drinking in the political economy and the case of early Iron Age France. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9 (4): 352–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Antonia, 1988. The Warrior Queens: The Legends and the Lives of the Women Who Have Led Their Nations in War. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. Blair, 1988. Agro-pastoralism and regional social organization in early Ireland. In Gibson, D. B. and Geselowitz, M. (eds), Tribe and Polity in Late Prehistoric Europe: 41–68. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Fritz-Rolf, 1995. Frühkeltisches Fürstengrab. Archäologie in Deutschland, vol. 2: 47–48. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Museum.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1991. Gender representation and social realtiy. In Walde, D. and Willows, N. (eds), The Archaeology of Gender. 11–16. Calgary: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Jacobsthal, Paul and Langsdorff, Alexander, 1929. Die Bronzeschnabelkannen: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des vorrömischen Imports nördlich der Alpen. Berlin: Heinrich Keller.Google Scholar
Joachim, HANS-Eckhart, 1991. The Rhineland. In Moscati, S. M., Frey, O. H., Kruta, V., Raftery, B., Szabó, M. (eds), The Celts: 261–264. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Kelly, Patricia, 1992. The Táin as literature. In Mallory, James P. (ed.), Aspects of the Táin: 69–101. Belfast: December Publications.Google Scholar
Kimmig, Wolfgang, 1988. Das Kleinsapergle: Studien zu einem Fürstengrabhügel der frühen Latènezeit bei Stuttgart. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Kruta, Venceslas, 1991. The first Celtic expansion: prehistory to history. In Moscati, Sabatino M., Frey, Otto-Herman, Kruta, Venceslas, Raftery, Barry, and Szabó, Miklós (eds), The Celts: 195–213. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Landolfi, Maurizio, 1991. The burial at Moscano Fabriano. In Moscati, Sabatino M., Frey, Otto-Herman, Kruta, Venceslas, Raftery, Barry, and Szabó, Miklós (eds), The Celts: 287. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, Andrea, 1993. Frauen in keltischer Zeit. In Dannheimer, H. and Gebhard, R. (eds), Das Keltische Jahrtausend: 47–53. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
MacCana, Proinsias, 1982. Women in Irish mythology. In Hederman, M. P. and Kearney, R. (eds), The Crane Bag Book of Irish Studies (1977–1981): 520–524. Dublin: Blackwater Press.Google Scholar
Mac Neill, Eóin, 1935. Early Irish Laws and Institutions. Dublin.Google Scholar
Markale, Jean, 1972. Die Keltische Frau: Mythos, Geschichte, Soziale Stellung. Paris: Editions Payot.Google Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, Muireann, 1982. Women in early Irish myths and sagas. In Hederman, M. P. and Kearney, R. (eds), The Crane Bag Book of Irish Studies (1977–1981): 525–532. Dublin: Blackwater Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Frank, 1967. The Backward Look. London.Google Scholar
O Corráin, Donnchad, 1979. Women in early Irish society. In Mac Curtain, M. and Corráin, D. O (eds), Women in Irish Society: The Historical Dimension: 1–13. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pallottino, Massimo, 1975. The Etruscans. (Cremona, J., trans., 6th ed.) Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Alain, 1988. Introduction au thème du Symposion. In Les Princes Celtes et la Mediterranée: 323–332. Paris: Recontre de l'Ecole du Louvre. La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
Patterson, Nerys, 1991. Cattle-lords and Clansmen: Kinship and Rank in Early Ireland. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (Harvard Studies in Sociology).Google Scholar
Patterson, Nerys, 1995. Clans are not primordial: Irish society and the modeling of pre-Roman societies in northern Europe. In Arnold, B. and Gibson, D. B. (eds) Celtic Chiefdom, Celtic State: 226–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauli, Ludwig, 1972. Untersuchungen zur Späthallstattkultur in Nordwürttemberg: Analyse eines Kleinraumes im Grenzbereich zweier Kulturen. Hamburger Beiträge zur Archäologie 2: 1–166. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Pauli, Ludwig, 1975. Keltischer Volksglaube: Amulette und Sonderbestattungen am Dürrnberg bei Hallein und im eisenzeitlichen Mitteleuropa. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Pauli, Ludwig, 1980. Die Kelten in Mitteleuropa. Salzburg: Amt der Salzburger Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Ritchie, James N. Graham and Ritchie, William F., 1995. The army, weapons and fighting. In Green, M. (ed.), The Celtic World: 37–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robb, John, 1994. Gender contradictions, moral coalitions, and inequality in prehistoric Italy. Journal of European Archaeology 2 (1): 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Janet D., 1993. What This Awl Means. Minneapolis: Minnesota Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Janet D. and Whelan, Mary K., 1991. Incorporating gender into archaeology courses. In Morgan, S. (ed.), Gender and Anthropology: 65–94. Washington: American Anthropological Association (Critical Reviews for Research and Teaching).Google Scholar
Spindler, Konrad, 1983. Die frühen Kelten. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Szabó, Miklós, 1991. The Celts and their movements in the third century BC. In Moscati, Sabatino M., Frey, Otto-Herman, Kruta, Venceslas, Raftery, Barry, and Szabó, Miklós (eds), The Celts: 303–319. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Tierney, James J., 1960. The Celtic ethnography of Posidonius. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 60 (section C): 189–275.Google Scholar
Vitali, Daniele, 1991 The Celts in Italy. In Moscati, S. M., Frey, O. H., Kruta, V., Raftery, B., Szabó, M. (eds), The Celts: 221–235. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Wais, Andre, 1995. Keltenfürstin mit reicher Mitgift. Archäologie in Deutschland 1: 55.Google Scholar
Wells, Peter S., 1980. Culture Contact and Culture Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Peter S., 1984. Farms, Villages, and Cities. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar