Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:21:23.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rostovtzeff's “Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World”1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Jacob Hammer
Affiliation:
Hunter College

Extract

Systems resembling modern étatisme can be traced to antiquity. So can other measures: planned economy in various fields, monopolies with their fixed prices and other burdens, forms of state control which benefited the state or particular individuals, but which compromised the best interests of the people. On the other hand, paying salaries to the poor, unemployed citizens to avert the outbreak of social revolutions, “soaking the rich” by excessive and even ruinous taxation were among the economic measures known to the ancient world also. So were other present-day phenomena: the presence of “haves and have-nots,” inflation, strikes, and the low purchasing power of the masses.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Preface, p. v.

3 Preface, p. vi.

4 For a new book in the field see John Day, An Economic History of Athens under Roman Domination (New York: Columbia University Press, 1942).Google Scholar

5 For a recent work on Philip, V, see Philip V of Macedon by Walbank, F. W. (Cambridge University Press, 1940).Google Scholar

6 Pp. 91, 96, 210.

7 Preface, viii.

8 Pp. 1–73.

9 Pp. 74–125.

10 Pp. 126–187.

11 P. 135.

12 Pp. 189–602.

13 P. 898; see also p. 1, 549, note 179.

14 “The Ptolemies and the Welfare of their Subjects,” American Historical Review. XLIII, 43 (1938), 276. Professor Westermann characterizes this right as “Foremost among the old Egyptian institutions which limited the theoretical absolutism of the Ptolemies.”Google Scholar

15 Chapter V, “Disintegration of the Balance of Power and Roman Intervention” (pp. 603–736); Chapter VI, “The Roman Protectorate and the First Stage of Roman Domination” (pp. 737–929); Chapter VII, “Roman Domination” (pp. 930–1,025).

16 P. 620; cf. also p. 889.

17 P. 622.

18 Pp. 705–736; 870–929

19 P. 910.

20 P. 911.

21 P. 912.

22 P. 911.

23 P. 912.

24 P. 913.

25 P. 1,031.

26 P. 15.

27 Pp. 1,026–1,312.

28 P. 1,032.

29 Pp. 1,032–1,053.

30 P. 1,037.

31 Pp. 1,053–1,134.

32 Pp. 1,073–1,077.

33 Pp. 1,077–1,095.

34 Pp. 1,115–1,126.

35 Pp. 1,126–1,134.

36 P. 1,115.

37 P. 1,120.

38 Pp. 1,134–1,312.

39 Pp. 1,135–1,159.

40 Pp. 1,159–1,180.

41 Pp. 1,180–1,200.

42 Pp. 1,200–1,238.

43 Pp. 1,238–1,301.

44 Pp. 1,301–1,312.

45 Pp. 1,313–1,779.

46 Pp. 1,313–1,631.

47 Pp. 1,632–1,642.

48 Pp. 1,659–1,779.