Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:25:07.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property Rights and Transaction Costs in Marriage: Evidence from Prenuptial Contracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Gillian Hamilton
Gillian Hamilton
Affiliation:
Gillian Hamilton is Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Toronto, 150 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3G7.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine prenuptial contracting behavior in early-nineteenth-centuiy Quebec to explore property rights within families and the efficacy of marital property laws. Drawing on a transaction cost framework, I examine the decision to sign a contract and couples' property rights choices. I find, for example, that couples signing contracts tended to choose joint ownership of property when wives were particularly important to the household. These findings illustrate the potential effects of legal institutions on individuals' behavior (such as the importance of family labor, human capital acquisition, and even mating decisions) and the value of a flexible legal environment.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 68 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Douglas. “What Does She See in Him?: The Effect of Sharing on the Choice of Spouse.” Economic Inquiry 30, no. 1 (1992): 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Douglas. “Marriage and Divorce: A Comment on Peters.” American Economic Review 82, no. 3 (1992): 679–85.Google Scholar
Allen, Douglas, and Lueck, Dean. “Risk Preferences and the Economics of Contracts.” American Economic Review 85, no.2(1995): 447-51.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee, Datta, Samar, and Nugent, Jeffrey. “Tenancy Choice in a Competitive Framework with Transactions Costs.” Journal of Political Economy 92, no. 4 (1984): 1121–33.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee, and Higgs, Robert. “Contractual Mix in Southern Agriculture Since the Civil War: Facts, Hypotheses, and Tests.” this JOURNAL 42, no. 3 (1982): 327–53.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee, and Owen Schapiro, Morton. “Inheritance Laws Across Colonies: Causes and Consequences.” this JOURNAL 44, no.2 (1984): 277–87.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Constance. Petticoats and Prejudice: Women and Law in Nineteenth Century Canada. Toronto: The Osgoode Society, 1991.Google Scholar
Basch, Norma. In the Eyes of the Law: Women, Marriage, and Property in Nineteenth-Century New York Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Theodore. “On the Economics of Polygyny.” Mimeo. University of Michigan, 1994.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Theodore. “Economics in a Family Way.” Journal of Economic Literature 34, no. 4 (1996): 1903–1934.Google Scholar
Betzig, Laura, ed. Human Nature:A Critical Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Betzig, Laura, Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique, and Turke, Paul, eds. Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. “The Marriage Squeeze and the Rise of Groomprice in India's Kerala State.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 23, no. 2 (1992): 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfield, Lloyd. Marriage Settlements 1601–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff, Mulder Monique. “Kipsigis Women's Preferences for Wealthy Men: Evidence for Female Choice in Mammals?” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27, no. 4 (1990): 255–64.Google Scholar
Botticini, Maristella. “Intergenerational Altruism and the Dowry System in a Tuscan Town, ca. 1415–1436.” Mimeo. Northwester University, 1997.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Gérard. “Transmission of Family Property and the Cycle of Quebec Rural Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Centuiy.” In Bradbuiy, Bettina, ed. Canadian Family History: Selected Readings, 112–34. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman, 1992.Google Scholar
Bourbeau, Robert, and Lélgaré, Jacques. évolution de la Mortalité au Canadaetau Québec, 1831–1931. Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1982.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Bettina, Gossage, Peter, Kolish, Evelyn, and Stewart, Alan. “Property and Marriage: The Law and the Practice in Early Nineteenth-Century Montreal.” Histoire Sociale-Social History 26, no. 51 (1993): 9–39.Google Scholar
Camden, Carroll. The Elizabethan Woman. Houston: Elsevier Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Census of Canada, 1870–1871, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Chambers, Lori. Married Women and Properly Law in Victorian Ontario. Toronto: Published for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History by University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marjorie Griffen. Women 's Work; Markets, and Economic Development in Nineteenth-Century Ontario. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darrow, Margaret. Revolution in the House: Family, Class, and Inheritance in Southern France, 1775–1825. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
David, Paul, and Sundstrom, W.. “Old-Age Security Motives, Labor Markets, and Farm Family Fertility in Antebellum America.” Explorations in Economic History 25, no. 2 (1988): 64–97.Google Scholar
Dechêne, Louise. Habitants and Merchants in Seventeenth-Century Montreal. Translated by Liana, Vardi. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Desloges, Yvon. A Tenant's Town: Québec in the 18th Century. Translated from the original French. Ottawa: Supply and Services Ltd., 1991.Google Scholar
Di, Matteo Livio. “The Determinants of Wealth and Asset Holding in Nineteenth-Century Canada: Evidence from Microdata” this JOURNAL 57, no. 4 (1997): 907–34.Google Scholar
Dionne, Hélène. Les Contrats de Manage à Québec (1790–1812). National Museum of Man, History Division, paper No. 29, Ottawa: National Museums of Canada, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, N. B., Fundamental Principles of the Laws of Canada. Montreal: J. Lovell, 1841–1847.Google Scholar
Eswaran, Mukesh, and Kotwal, Ashok. “A Theory of Contractual Structure in Agriculture.” American Economic Review 75, no. 3 (1985): 352–67.Google Scholar
Gaulin, Steven J. C., and S. Boster, James. “Dowry as Female Competition.” American Anthropologist 92, no. 4 (1990): 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Wendy. Women in Seventeenth Century France. London: MacMillan Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. “The Economic Status of Women in the Early Republic: Quantitative Evidence.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16, no. 1 (1986): 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Oriental, the Ancient, and the Primitive: Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-industrial Societies of Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Greer, Allan. “The Pattern of Literacy in Quebec, 1745–1899.” Histoire Sociale-Social History 11, no. 22 (1978): 293–335.Google Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana. On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and Divorce. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Guildford, Janet, and Morton, Suzanne, eds. Separate Spheres: Women's Worlds in the 19th-Century Maritimes. Fredericton, N.B.: Acadiensis Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “Long Term Marriage Patterns in the United States from Colonial Times to the Present.” The History of the Family 1, no. 1 (1996): 15–39.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” In Glass, D.V. and Eversley, D.E.C., eds., Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography. London: E. Arnold, 1965.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John. “Age at Marriage and Proportions Marriying.” Population Studies 7, no. 3 (1953): 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Gillian. “The Decline of Apprenticeship in North America: Evidence from Montreal.” Mimeo. University of Toronto, 1998.Google Scholar
Hartung, John. “Polygyny and Inheritance of Wealth.” In Human Nature: A Critical Reader, edited by Betzig, Laura, 331–43. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Henripin, Jacques. La Population Canadienne au Début du XVIIIe Siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henripin, Jacques, and Péron, Yves. “The Demographic Transition of the Province of Quebec.” In Population and Social Change, edited by Glass, D. V., and Revelle, Roger, 213–33. London: Edward Arnold Ltd., 1972.Google Scholar
Houlbrooke, R. “The Making of Marriage in Mid-Tudor England: Evidence from the Records of Matrimonial Contract Litigation.” Journal of Family History 10, no. 1 (1985): 339–51.Google Scholar
Hufton, Olwen. The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, Vol. 1. London: Harper Collins, 1995.Google Scholar
Landry, Yves. “Gender Imbalance, Les Filles du Roi, and Choice of Spouse in New France.” In Canadian Family History: Selected Readings, edited by Bradbury, Bettina, 14–32. Montreal: Copp Clark Pitman, Ltd., 1992.Google Scholar
Lewis, Frank, and McInnis, Marvin. “The Efficiency of the French-Canadian Farmer in the Nineteenth Century.” this JOURNAL 40, no. 3 (1980): 497–514.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Shelly, and Pollak, Robert. “Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market.” Journal of Political Economy 101, no. 6 (1993): 988–1011.Google Scholar
McCallum, John. Unequal Beginnings: Agriculture and Economic Development in Quebec and Ontario until 1870. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Murray, John. “Generation(s) of Human Capital: Literacy in American Families, 1830–1875.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 27, no. 3 (1997): 413–35.Google Scholar
Narrett, David E.Inheritance and Family Life in Colonial New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Norrie, Kenneth, and Owram, Douglas. A History of the Canadian Economy, 2d ed.Toronto: Harcourt Brace, 1996.Google Scholar
Peters, H.Elizabeth. “Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting.” American Economic Review 76, no. 3 (1986): 437–54.Google Scholar
Peters, H. Elizabeth. “Marriage and Divorce: Reply.” American Economic Review 82, no. 3 (1992): 686–93.Google Scholar
Rao, Vijayendra. “The Rising Price of Husbands: A Hedonic Analysis of Dowry Increases in Rural India.” Journal of Political Economy 101, no. 4 (1993): 666–77.Google Scholar
Salmon, Marylynn. “Women and Property in South Carolina: The Evidence from Marriage Settlements, 1730 to 1830.” William and Mary Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1982): 655–85.Google Scholar
Salmon, Marylynn. Women and the Law of Property in Early America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Shammas, Carole, Salmon, Marylynn, and Dahlin, Michel. Inheritance in America: From Colonial Times to the Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Siow, Aloysius. “Differential Fecundity, Markets and Gender Roles.” Journal of Political Economy 106, no. 2 (1998): 334–54.Google Scholar
South, Scott, and Lloyd, Kim. “Marriage Opportunities and Family Formation: Further Implications of Imbalanced Sex Ratios.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54 (1992): 440–51.Google Scholar
South, Scott, and Trent, Katherine. “Sex Ratios and Women's Roles: A Cross-National Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 93, no. 5 (1988): 1096–115.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alan M., and Bradbury, Bettina. “Marriage Contracts as a Source for Historians.” In Class, Gender and the Law in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Quebec: Sources and Perspectives, edited by Donald, Fyson, et al., 29–53. Montreal: Montreal History Group, Number 1, 1993.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex, and Marriage in England 1500–1800. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Electronic edition edited by B. Carter, Susan, et al., [machine-readable data file]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ward, Peter. Courtship, Love, and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century English Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Watt, Jeffrey. “Marriage Contract Disputes in Early Modem Neuchatel, 1547–1806.” Journal of Social History 22, no. 1 (1988): 129–47.Google Scholar
Wells, Robert V. “The Population of England's Colonies in America: Old English or New Americans?” Population Studies 46, no. 1 (1992): 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Lisa. Life after Death: Widows in Pennsylvania, 1750–1850. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Young, Brian. “Getting Around Legal Incapacity: The Legal Status of Married Women in Trade in Mid-Nineteenth Century Lower Canada.” In Canadian Papers in Business History, edited by Baskerville, Peter, 1–16. Victoria: Public History Group, University of Victoria, 1989.Google Scholar