Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:12:28.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Typhoid Rates and the Public Acquisition of Private Waterwork, 1880–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Werner Troesken
Affiliation:
Werner Troesken is National Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305-6010.

Abstract

Progressive-Era reformers claimed typhoid, a waterborne disease, was more prevalent in cities with private water companies than in cities with public water companies. This article tests this claim for the 1880 to 1920 period. The evidence suggests private companies invested in water filters more often than public companies, and that switching from private to public provision of water did little to improve typhoid rates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Water Works Association. Water Works Practice: A Manual. Baltimore:The Williams and Wilkins Company, 1926.Google Scholar
Blake, Nelson. Water for the Cities: A History of the Urban Water Supply Problem in the United States. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Cain, Louis P., and J. Rotella, Elyce. “Death and Spending: Did Urban Mortality Shocks Lead to Municipal Expenditure Increases?” Copy. Loyola University, Northwestern University, and Indiana University, no date.Google Scholar
Cain, Louis P., and J. Rotella, Elyce. “Urbanization, Sanitation, and Mortality in the Progressive Era, 1899–1929.” Copy. Loyola University, Northwestern University, and Indiana University, no date.Google Scholar
Clark, Evan. “Municipal Ownership in the United States.” Intercollegiate Socialist 5, no. 1 (1916): 130.Google Scholar
Florida, . Board of Health. Thirty-Second Report of the State Board of Health of Florida, 1921–1922. Jacksonville, FL: The Palatka News, 1922.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. “Cycles and Trends of Mortality in 18 Large American Cities, 1871–1900,” Explorations in Economic History 16, no. 3 (1979): 381408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgs, Robert. Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Huch, Ronald K.Typhoid' Truelson, Water, and Politics in Duluth, 1896–1900,” Minnesota History 45, no. 2 (1981): 189–99.Google Scholar
Kiple, Kenneth F.The Cambridge World History of Human Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, R. E. Rates, Revenues and Results of Municipal Ownership of Water Works in the US. Kansas City: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, 1924.Google Scholar
Meeker, Edward. “The Social Rate of Return on Investment in Public Health, 1880–1910.” Journal of Economic History 34, no. 3 (1974): 392421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mokyr, Joel, and Stein, Rebecca. “Science, Health, and Household Technology: The Effect of the Pasteur Revolution on Consumer Demand.” In The Economics of New Goods, edited by Bresnahan, Timothy F. and Gordon, Robert J., pp.4783. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
National Civic Federation. Municipal and Private Operation of Public Utilities. Part 1. Volume 1. New York: National Civic Federation, 1907.Google Scholar
North Carolina. Board of Health. Biennial Report of the State Board of Health, various issues, 1888–1913.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Jonathan B., and Tunali, İnsan. 1995. “Strangers' Disease: Determinants of Yellow Fever Mortality during the New Orleans Epidemic of 1853.” Explorations in Economic History 32, no. 4 (1995): 517–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, William T.Principles of Sanitary Science and the Public Health, With Special Reference to the Causation and Prevention of Infectious Diseases. New York: MacMillan Company, 1922.Google Scholar
Joel A., Tarr “Infrastructure and City-Building in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In City at the Point: Essays on the Social History of Pittsburgh, edited by Hays, Samuel P., pp. 2449. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Troesken, Werner. “Laws Governing the Municipal Acquisition of Private Waterworks, 1880–1925.” Copy. Department of History. University of Pittsburgh, 1996.Google Scholar
Troesken, Werner. “The Sources of Public Ownership: Historical Evidence from the Gas Industry.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13, no. 1 (1997): 127.Google Scholar
Troesken, Werner. “Patronage and Public-Sector Wages in 1896.” Journal of Economic History 59, no. 2 (1999): 424–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States. House Document 107. Number 713. 56th Congress, 1st Session. Fourteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor: 1899. Water, Gas, and Electric Light Plants Under Private and Public Ownership. Washington, DC: GPO, 1900.Google Scholar
United States. Department of Agriculture. Weather Bureau. Climatic Survey of the United States. Sections 1–106. Washington, DC: GPO, 1954.Google Scholar
United States. Department of the Interior. Census. Various volumes. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.Google Scholar
United States. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. Special Reports. Mortality Statistics. Washington, DC: GPO, various years, 1900–1923Google Scholar
United States. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. General [Financial] Statistics of Cities Having a Population of Over 30,000. Washington, DC: GPO, various years, 1906–1923.Google Scholar
Whipple, George C.Typhoid Fever: Its Causation, Transmission, and Prevention. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1908.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Delos F.Municipal Franchises: A Description of the Terms and Conditions upon which Private Corporations enjoy Special Privileges in the Streets of American Cities. Volume 1. New York: McGraw Hill, 1910.Google Scholar