Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:31:27.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spring-Wheat Farmer in a Maturing Economy 1870–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Theodore Saloutos
Theodore Saloutos
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The spring-wheat region, stretching from central Minnesota across the X Dakotas and into Montana, has been the seat of much unrest owing to its unbalanced development from 1870 to 1920. It was colonized by seekers of the proverbial “free home” and fabulous profits to be had by raising wheat. As a result many farmers assumed burdensome economic ties and fell victims to over-optimism. Their difficulties were due to a variety of complex factors, some within and others outside their control; yet, one trend stood out noticeably: the grain growers persisted in a ruinous, anarchistic form competition, whereas among the merchants and their powerful allies competition was closely regulated.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , November 1946 , pp. 173 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1914, pp. 393–97; Rich, John H., The Economic Position of Agriculture in the Northwestern Grain Raising Areas (Washington, 1923)Google Scholar; The Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, Agricultural Depression; Causes and Remedies, Senate Report No. 787, 53d Congress, 3d Session (1894), PP. 25–26Google Scholar, 36–37; Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade (Washington, 1920–1926), II, 148–52Google Scholar.

2 Commissioner of Immigration, Territory of Dakota, Resources of Dakota, 1887 (Pierre, Dakota Territory, 1887), pp. 280–87Google Scholar; Holt, O. H., Dakota (Chicago, 1883), pp. 9–10Google Scholar.

3 Hedges, J. B., “The Colonization Work of the Northern Pacific Railroad,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, XIII (1927), 311–42Google Scholar; Power, J. B., “Bits of History Connected with the Early Days of the Northern Pacific Railway and the Organization of Its Land Department,” Collections of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, III (1910), 337–48Google Scholar; North Dakota Commissioner of Agriculture and Labor, North Dakota, Resources and Advantages (Bismarck, 1892)Google Scholar.

4 Biennial Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Labor to the Twelfth Legislative Assembly on Problems of Immigration for the Term Ending December 31, ipio (Bismarck, 1910), pp. 4–5Google Scholar, 12; Commissioner of Agriculture and Labor, North Dakota, 1880–1914, The Making of a State (Bismarck, n.d.), p. 20Google Scholar.

5 Ross, Earle, “Roosevelt and Agriculture,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review, XIV (1928), 287–88Google Scholar; Engberg, Russell C., Industrial Prosperity and the Farmer (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1927), p. 25Google Scholar; Gee, Wilson, The Place of Agriculture in American Life (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1930), pp. 9–10Google Scholar; Blegen, Theodore, “The Competition of the Northwestern States for Immigrants,” Wisconsin Magazine of History, III (1920), 3–29Google Scholar; Carver, Thomas N., “Historical Sketch of American Agriculture,” in Bailey, L. H., ed., Cyclopaedia of American Agriculture (New York, 1910), IV, 65Google Scholar.

6 , Coulter, “Bonanza Farms and the One Crop System of Agriculture,” in Industrial History of the Valley of the Red River of the North (Bismarck, n.d.), pp. 43–70Google Scholar. Reprinted from Collections of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, III (1910)Google Scholar.

7 Hagerty, F. H., The Territory of Dakota, The State of North Dakota, The State of South Dakota, An Official Statistical, Historical and Political Abstract (Aberdeen, 1889), pp. 72–73Google Scholar; Twenty-second Annual Report of the Chamber of Commerce (Minneapolis, 1904), p. 13Google Scholar.

8 , Holt, Dakota, pp. 9–11Google Scholar.

9 , Hagerty, Territory of Dakota, pp. 61–63Google Scholar.

10 Gillette, John M., Constructive Rural Sociology (New York: Sturgis and Walton Company, 1913), p. 22Google Scholar.

11 Andrews, Christopher C., The Condition and Needs of Spring Wheat Culture in the Northwest, United States Department of Agriculture, Special Report No. 40, 1882, pp. 41–43Google Scholar.

12 Mavor, J., “Economic Results of the Specialist Production and Marketing of Wheat,” Political Science Quarterly, XXVI (1911), 370Google Scholar; North Dakota Magazine, I (1906), 30–31Google Scholar. According to the last source, “One season's crop generally pays for the land and leaves a snug sum besides.”

13 Goldenweiser, E. A., The Farmers Income, U.S.D.A. Farmers Bulletin, No. 746, 1916, pp. 1–2Google Scholar.

14 Kingsbury, George W., History of Dakota Territory (Chicago: S. J. Clarke Publishing Company, 1915). II, 1,030Google Scholar.

15 Farming Lands of the Soo Line in Minnesota and North Dakota (Minneapolis, 1895), pp. 8, 11,18Google Scholar.

16 Hill, James J., “Proper Land Cultivation and Production,” The Quarterly Journal of the University of North Dakota, I (1911), Special Number, pp. 113–19Google Scholar.

17 North Dakota Magazine, IV (1910), 105Google Scholar.

18 True, A. C., A History of Agricultural Extension Work in the United States, 1785–1923, U.S.D.A., Miscellaneous Publications, No. 15, 1928, pp. 75–76, 85–86, 92–93Google Scholar.

19 U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1921, pp. 94, 96Google Scholar.

20 , Rich, Economic Position of Agriculture, p. 9Google Scholar.

21 U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1921, p. 77Google Scholar.

22 North Dakota, Its Development and Resources, Being a Statement Submitted to the Committee on Territories of the Two Houses of Congress in January, 1882 (Washington, 1882), p. 8Google Scholar; , Holt, Dakota, p. 16Google Scholar. In 1885, Holt wrote that, except for the “industrious Scandinavians” and “sprinklings of Germans,” the population was almost 90 per cent American.

23 ….Dakota has drawn from the older States the best blood that flows in American veins. “Reference was also made to American Dakotians.”—Coulter, Industrial History of the Valley of the Red River of the North, pp. 116–18.

24 , Rich, Economic Position of Agriculture, p. 7Google Scholar.

25 Nourse, Edwin G., American Agriculture and the European Market (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1924), p. 28Google Scholar.

26 Lapham, Mary H., Soil Survey of Western North Dakota (Washington, 1910), pp. 26–29Google Scholar.

27 Commissioner of Agriculture and Labor, North Dakota, 1889–1914, The Making of a Slate (n.p., n.d.), p. 16Google Scholar.

28 Northern Pacific Railway, Western North Dakota (n.p., 1915). P. 5Google Scholar.

28 Scott, John W., “The Pioneer Farmer,” The Quarterly Journal of the University of North Dakota, XIII (1923), 292Google Scholar; The James River Valley Settlers and Investors Guide (n.p., n.d.), p. 6. Note the advice offered: “People that come here need no great amount of money or influential friends for in this glorious country one man is just as good as another, all he needs i s grit and muscle.”

29 Report of the United States Industrial Commission, X (1901), xv, 790Google Scholar.

30 , Rich, Economic Position of Agriculture, pp. 2–4Google Scholar.

31 Commissioner of Immigration, Resources of Dakota, 1887, p. 303Google Scholar; , Scott, “The Pioneer Farmer,” The Quarterly Journal of the University of North Dakota, XIII, 292Google Scholar.

32 Commissioner of Immigration, Resources of Dakota, 1887, pp. 300–1Google Scholar.

33 , Hagerty, Territory of Dakota, p. 114Google Scholar.

34 Jacobstein, Meyer, “Farm Credit in a Northwestern State,” The American Economic Review, III (1913), 603Google Scholar.

35 Wright, Ivan, Farm Mortgage Financing (New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1923), pp. 107–17Google Scholar.

36 , Jacobstein, “Farm Credit,” The American Economic Review, III, 598–603Google Scholar.

37 , Wright, Farm Mortgage Financing, p. 65Google Scholar.

38 Eliot, Clara, The Farmer's Campaign for Credit (New York and London: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1927), esp. pp. 72–73Google Scholar.

39 Lee, Virgil P., Principles of Agricultural Credit (New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1930), p. 361Google Scholar.

40 Seligmann, E. R. A., The Income Tax; A Study of the History, Theory, and Practice of Income Taxation (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1914), pp. 3–40Google Scholar; North Dakota Tax Commissioner to the Governor and the Legislature, Fifth Biennial Report for the Fiscal Year 1910 and 1920, pp. 6, 15Google Scholar; Eighth Biennial Report for the Fiscal Year 1925 and 1926, pp. 8–10. See p. 13 for a brief history of taxation in North Dakota from 1917 to 1923; , Rich, Economic Position of Agriculture, pp. 11–13, 26Google Scholar.

41 Smith, J. R., North America (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1925), pp. 346–47Google Scholar; Stratton, G. F., “When the Drouth Came,” Sunset, XLV (1920), pp. 36–38Google Scholar; U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1924, pp. 516–17Google Scholar.

42 Report of the United States Industrial Commission, X, cxx, cxxii-cxxiii, 275Google Scholar; Wilcox, E. V., “The Farmer's Labor Problem,” The American Labor Legislation Review, VIII (1918), 46Google Scholar; , Rich, Economic Position of American Agriculture, p. 8Google Scholar; Baer, J. M., “The Wheat Crop and Farm Labor,” The American Review of Reviews, LVII (1918), No. 3, p. 398Google Scholar; “Farm Labor and the Eight-Hour Day,” The Outlook, CXXVII (1921), 57Google Scholar.

43 Senate Report No. 787, pp. 52–53; U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1020, p. 550. The last source gives the percentages of the wheat crop exported.

44 Peel, George, The Economic Impact of America (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1928), p. 94Google Scholar; Droppers, Garrett, Outlines of Economic History in the Nineteenth Century (New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1923), p. 211Google Scholar; , Nourse, American Agriculture and the European Market, p. 28Google Scholar.

45 Kuhlmann, Charles B., The Development of the Flour-Milling Industry in the United States (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1929), p. 144Google Scholar; Larson, Henrietta M., The Wheat Market and the Farmer in Minnesota, 1858–1900 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1926), p. 134Google Scholar.

46 Senate Report No. 787, p. 27.

47 Fifth Biennial Report of the Bureau of Labor of the State of Minnesota (St. Paul, 1896), pp. 122–23, 402–3Google Scholar.

48 Senate Report No. 787, pp. 52–53.

49 Wallace, Henry C., The Wheat Situation (Washington, 1923), pp. 7–9Google Scholar, reprinted from U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1923.

50 Surface, Frank M., The Grain Trade During the World War, Being a History of the Food Administration (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1928), pp. 154–55Google Scholar; , Wallace, The Wheat Situation, p. 4Google Scholar; , Nourse, American Agriculture and the European Market, pp. 74–76Google Scholar.

51 Report of the United States Industrial Commission, X, ccciii-iv.

52 , Andrews, The Condition and Needs of Spring Wheat Culture in the Northwest, pp. 48–51Google Scholar; “Another Aspect of the Farmers Movement,” The Nation, XVII (1873), 68Google Scholar; , Larson, The Wheat Market and the Farmer in Minnesota, pp. 45–47Google Scholar, 65–66, 122–26, 190–93, 202–3; , Rich, Economic Position of Agriculture, p. 16Google Scholar; , Holt, Dakota, p. 11Google Scholar.

53 Vernon, Edward, American Railroad Manual, II (New York, 1874), iv–lviGoogle Scholar; Had-ley, A. T., “The Railway in Its Business Relations,” in Cooley, T. M., The American Railway (New York, 1889), pp. 363–64Google Scholar.

54 “There has been a very heavy reduction in the rates of freight upon all classes of agricultural products during the past twenty years. Especially is this true of the rates from large accumulation points in the West to the sea-board, whether intended for consumption or not.” —Report of the Secretary of Agriculture, 1889. See also Report of the Industrial Commission, X, ccciii-iv.

55 Locklin, D. Philip, Economics of Transportation (Chicago: Business Publications, 1935), pp. 296–97, 306–7Google Scholar.

56 These figures were provided by Chester E. Oliphant, Chief Statistician, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company. Oliphant to Saloutos, April 27, 1945. The figures for the years 1865 to 1873 are for the Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company, and thefiguresfrom 1874 to 1920 are for the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company.

57 These figures were provided by A. R. Seder, General Auditor, Chicago and North Western Railway Company. Seder to Saloutos, May 18, 1945.

58 These figures were provided by J. H. Poore, Executive Assistant, Office of the President, Northern Pacific Railway Company. Poore to Saloutos, May 17, 1945.

59 These figureswere provided by Charles W. Moore, Executive Assistant, Public Relations, Great Northern Railway Company. Moore to Saloutos, May 4,1945.

60 Senate Report No. 787, pp. 26–27.

61 Pickett, Victor G. and Vaile, Roland S., The Decline of Northwestern Flour Milling (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1933)Google Scholar; Malott, Deane W., Problems in Agricultural Marketing (New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1938), pp. 289–93Google Scholar; League, Nonpartisan, Facts for the Farmers (n.p., 06 1917), p. 84Google Scholar.

62 , Wallace, The Wheat Situation, p. 20Google Scholar; Baker, O. E., “Changes in Production and Consumption of Our Farm Products and the Trend in Population,” The Annals, CXLII (1929), 119–21Google Scholar.

63 Cummings, Richard O., The American and His Food; A History of Food Habits in the United States (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1940), p. 236Google Scholar.

64 Galpin, Charles J., Rural Social Problems (New York and London: The Century Company, 1924), pp. 13–27Google Scholar.

65 Boudin, Louis B., The Theoretical System of Karl Marx in the Light of r.ecent Criticism (Chicago: C. H. Kerr and Company, 1907), pp. 183–84Google Scholar.

66 Price, H. Bruce, The Marketing of Farm Products; Studies in the Organization of the Twin Cities Market (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1927), p. 15Google Scholar; Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, 1, 135–36Google Scholar.

67 Zimmermann, Erich W., World Resources and Industries (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1933), p. 178Google Scholar.

68 , Larson, The Wheat Market and the Farmer in Minnesota, p. 134Google Scholar; Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, II, 141Google Scholar.

69 Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, II, 141–42Google Scholar; “The Exchanges of Minneapolis, Duluth, Kansas City, Missouri, Omaha, Buffalo, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Toledo,” The Annals, XXXVIII (1911), 545Google Scholar.

70 “The Exchanges,” The Annals, XXXVIII, 549.

71 Federal Trade Commission Decisions, VII, 133.

72 Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, II, 205Google Scholar.

73 Federal Trade Commission Decisions, VII, 133.

74 Ibid., VII, 132.

75 Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, II, 148–52Google Scholar.

76 Federal Trade Commission Decisions, VII, 137–38.

77 Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, III, 203–5Google Scholar.

78 Ibid., I, 83–85, 284–85; Testimony Taken by Interstate Commerce Commission in Matter of Relations of Common Carriers to the Grain Trade, Senate Document No. 278, 59th Congress, 2d Session (1907), pp. 942–45.

79 Federal Trade Commission, The Grain Trade, III, 207Google Scholar.

80 Ibid., III, 216.

81 Ibid., III, 198.

82 Ibid., III, 234.

83 Ibid., III, 235.

84 Ibid., III, 223–25.

85 Ibid., I, 94.

86 Ibid., I, 104–7.

87 Federal Trade Commission Decisions, VII, 137–38.

88 U.S.D.A., Yearbook, 1923, p. 513; Report of the President's Committee, Farm Tenancy (Washington, 1937), pp. 96–97Google Scholar.

89 Rich, , Economic Position of Agriculture, pp. 8–9Google Scholar.