Article contents
Sir John Howard Clapham and the Empirical Reaction in Economic History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2011
Extract
When Clapham began to teach economic history at Leeds in 1902 Schmoller had just finished his Foundations of Political Economy, and the first edition of Sombart's Modern Capitalism had just appeared. In the early editions of J. A. Hobson's Evolution of Modern Capitalism many aspects of the Marxian interpretation of history were effectively expressed and afforded a clear measure of the stimulus that economic history was to receive from this general approach. But these influences were not the dominant factor in Clapham's thought at the beginning of his career or at any later period. His interests in history came from Lord Acton and from Alfred Marshall. Marshall was anxious to draw him into the field of economic history, “he was eager to get historical work done.” Clapham says in the Inaugural Lecture, “… he pointed out to me tracts of economic history which needed someone's work. Then he pointed at me and said—‘Thou art the man.’ I hesitated then, for Acton's power was on me, as I hope it still is. But Marshall has prevailed.”
- Type
- Review Articles and Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1951
References
1 SirClapham, John Howard, The Study of Economic History (Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1929), pp. 8–9Google Scholar.
2 Ibid., p. 27.
3 London: Methuen & Co., 1907.
4 A Concise Economic History of Britain from the Earliest Times to 1750 (Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1949), pp. xv, 324. $2.75.Google Scholar
5 Ibid., p. xvii.
6 An Economic History of Modern Britain (3 vols.; Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1926–38), III, 507Google Scholar.
7 The Bank of England: A History (Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1944Google Scholar).
8 The Economic Development of France and Germany, 1815–1914 (Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1921)Google Scholar.
9 Jevons, William Stanley, The Coal Question (London, 1865).Google Scholar
10 Lehfeldt, R. A., “The Normal Law of Progress,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, LXXIX (1916), 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5
- Cited by