Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:00:46.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional Income Differentials in Canada, 1911–1961

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

R. Marvin McInnis
Affiliation:
Queen's University

Extract

The point of departure of this dissertation is the observation that, over the entire period for which statistics are available, regional differences in income per capita in Canada have remained unchanged. Five commonly recognized regions of the country are considered: the Maritimes, Quebec, Ontario, the Prairie Provinces, and British Columbia. Official statistical series show that the relative levels of income per capita in the five regions have been about the same in recent years as in the late 1920's, when the series begins. In a world of continuous change there may be no single expected trend of regional income differentials, but convergence does seem to be a common pattern among the industrially advanced nations of the world.2 The Canadian experience is sufficiently interesting to call for further examination. The dissertation summarized here begins this examination in two ways: estimates of regional per capita income are made for some years prior to the beginning of the official series and a preliminary examination of some important factors influencing regional income differences is begun.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Canada, Dominion Bureau of Statistics, National Accounts, Income and Expenditure, 1926-1956 (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1958 and subsequent annual issues), Table 29.Google Scholar

2 Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. XIII, No. 4, Part II (07 1965).Google Scholar