Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:23:46.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Paper by Aufhauser

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Heywood Fleisig
Heywood Fleisig
Affiliation:
Cornell University and Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 80 note 1 Rosenberg, N., “The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, XVIII (October 1969), 12–17.Google ScholarMarx, K., Capital (N.Y.: International Publishers, 1947Google Scholar; reprint of 1889 English ed., trans, of 3rd German ed.), vol. I, pp. 427–449. Marx's view of the effects of a high land/labor ratio imply he would not expect such opposition in the New World (pp. 790–800). Strassman, W. P., Risk and Technical Innovation: American Manufacturing Methods during the Nineteenth Century (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1959), pp. 55, 112–113, 184–189.Google Scholar

page 81 note 2 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington: G.P.O., 1960), pp. 74, 90, 91, 94.Google Scholar

page 81 note 3 Arrow, Kenneth, “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in NBER, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp. 616–619.Google Scholar Conversation with William Parker, spring 1965. A form of the argument applied to mineral discoveries appears in Parker, W. N., “The Land, Minerals, Water, and Forests,” in Davis, L. E., et al., American Economic Growth (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), pp. 96–98.Google Scholar

page 82 note 4 Mishan, E. J., Technology and Growth (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970), pp. 148–151.Google ScholarMarglin, S., “What do Bosses Do?” Harvard University mimeo, August 1971, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar