Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:28:18.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agricultural Productivity Growth During the Decade of the Civil War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Lee A. Craig
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7506; Research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research; and Fellow of the Center for Demographic Studies, Duke University.
Thomas Weiss
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045; and Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Abstract

New evidence based on census data indicates that output per agricultural worker grew faster between 1860 and 1870 than during any other decade of the nineteenth century. Although this evidence seems to support the traditional view that the Civil War was a catalyst for an increasingly productive agricultural sector, we contend that this apparent robust performance results from a measurement problem that afflicts census-based labor force series. An alternative estimate of labor force performance during the decade reveals the importance of increased labor inputs of women and children, in numbers, effort, and—especially—time.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred, To Their Own Soil: Agriculture in the Antebellum North (Ames, IA, 1987).Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, “Improvement in American Dairy Farming, 1850–1910: A Quantitative Analysis,” this Journal, 28 (06 1968), pp. 255–73.Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, “Labor Inputs and Productivity in American Dairy Agriculture, 1850–1910,” this Journal, 29 (06 1969), pp. 206–29.Google Scholar
Bateman, Fred, and Foust, James, “Agricultural and Demographic Records of 21, 118 Rural Households” (Magnetic Tape, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1973).Google Scholar
Bidwell, Percy W., and Falconer, John I., History of Agriculture in the Northern United States, 1620–1860 (Washington, DC, 1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blodget, Samuel, Economica: A Statistical Manual for the United States of America (Washington, DC, 1806; Reprinted, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Bogart, Ernest, The Economic History of American Agriculture (New York, 1923).Google Scholar
Boydston, Jeanne, Home and Work: Houses, Wages, and the Ideology of Labor in the New Republic (New York, 1990).Google Scholar
Cochran, Thomas, “Did the Civil War Retard Industrialization?Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 46 (09 1961), pp. 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Lee A., “Farm Output, Productivity, and Fertility Decline in the Antebellum Northern U.S.” (Ph.D. diss., Indiana University, Bloomington, 1989).Google Scholar
Craig, Lee A., “The Value of Household Labor in Antebellum Northern Agriculture,” this Journal, 51 (03. 1991), pp. 6782.Google Scholar
Craig, Lee A., “Industrialization, Urbanization, and the Transformation of Women's Work in Nineteenth-Century American Agriculture” (Photocopy, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1992).Google Scholar
Craig, Lee A., To Plant or Sow One Acre More: Childbearing and Farm Productivity in the Antebellum North (Baltimore, 1993).Google ScholarPubMed
Craig, Lee A., and Field-Hendrey, Elizabeth, “Industrialization and the Earnings Gap: Regional and Sectoral Tests of the Goldin-Sokoloff Hypothesis,” Explorations in Economic History, 30 (01 1993), pp. 6080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A., “The Mechanization of Reaping in the Antebellum Midwest,” in Rosovsky, Henry, ed., Industrialization in Two Systems (New York, 1966), pp. 339.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., “The Growth of Real Product in the United States Before 1840: New Evidence, Controlled Conjectures,” this Journal, 27 (06 1967), pp. 151–97.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alba, Comparative Occupation Statistics for the United States, 1870–1940, 16th Census Report (Washington, DC, 1940).Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, “The Economic Impact of the Civil War,” Explorations in Economic History, 3 (Spring/Summer 1966), pp. 176–99.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, and Gallman, Matthew, “The Civil War Economy: A Modern View” (Photocopy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 1992).Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, and Goldin, Claudia, “Seasonality in Nineteenth Century Labor Markets,” in Schaefer, Donald and Weiss, Thomas, eds., American Economic Development in Historical Perspective (Stanford, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy, and Wagman, Barnet, “Counting Housework: New Estimates of Real Product in the United States, 1800–1860,” this Journal, 53 (06 1993), pp. 275–88.Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert, “Gross National Product in the United States, 1834–1909,” in Brady, Dorothy, ed., Output, Employment, and Productivity, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (New York, 1966), vol. 30, pp. 376.Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert, “The Agricultural Sector and the Pace of Economic Growth,” in Klingaman, David and Vedder, Richard, eds., Essays in Nineteenth Century Economic History (Athens, OH, 1975), pp. 3576.Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., The Farmer's Age: Agriculture, 1815–1860 (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
Gates, Paul W., Agriculture and the Civil War (New York, 1965).Google Scholar
Hurt, R. Douglas, “Northern Agriculture After the Civil War, 1864–1900,” in Ferleger, Lou, ed., Agriculture and National Development (Ames, IA, 1990), pp. 5374.Google Scholar
ICPSR, Historical Demographic, Economic and Social Data: The United States, 1790–1970 (Magnetic Tape, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1973).Google Scholar
Lampard, Eric, The Rise of the Dairy Industry in Wisconsin: A Study in Agricultural Change (Madison, 1963).Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley, Manpower in Economic Growth (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley, “Labor Force and Employment, 1800–1960,” in Brady, Dorothy, ed., Output, Employment, and Productivity, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (New York, 1966), vol. 30, pp. 117204.Google Scholar
McPherson, James, Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Newton, James, and Lewis, Ronald, eds., The Other Slaves: Mechanics, Artisans, and Craftsmen (Boston, 1978).Google Scholar
Olmstead, Alan, “The Civil War as a Catalyst of Technological Change in Agriculture,” Business and Economic History, 5 (1976), pp. 3650.Google Scholar
Olson, John, “The Occupational Structure of Plantation Slave Labor in the Late Antebellum Era” (Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 1983).Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard, One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation (Cambridge, MA, 1977).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Wayne, Readings in the History of American Agriculture (Urbana, IL, 1960).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Wayne, “The Civil War: A Catalyst of Agricultural Revolution,” Agricultural History, 39 (10 1965), pp. 187–95.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Wayne, “Agriculture,” in Porter, Glenn, ed., Encyclopedia of American Economic History (New York, 1980), pp. 344–60.Google Scholar
Ross, Earle, and Tontz, Robert, “The Term ‘Agricultural Revolution’ as Used by Economic Historians,” Agricultural History, 22 (01 1948), pp. 3238.Google Scholar
Schlebecker, John, Whereby We Thrive: A History of American Farming, 1607–1972 (Ames, IA, 1975).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Louis, “Agriculture in the United States,” The Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York, 1930).Google Scholar
Schob, David, Hired Hands and Plowboys (Urbana, IL, 1975).Google Scholar
Shannon, Fred A., Organization and Administration of the Union Army (Cleveland, OH, 1928).Google Scholar
Shannon, Fred A., The Farmer's Last Frontier: Agriculture, 1860–1897 (New York, 1945).Google Scholar
Starobin, Robert, Industrial Slavery in the Old South (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Strauss, F., and Bean, L. H., “Gross Farm Income and Indices of Farm Production and Prices in the United States, 1869–1937,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 703 (Washington, DC, 1940).Google Scholar
Towne, Marvin, and Rasmussen, Wayne, “Farm Gross Product and Gross Investment in the Nineteenth Century,” in Parker, William, ed., Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Princeton, NJ, 1960), vol. 24, pp. 255312.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, Thirteenth Census: Occupations (Washington, DC, 1910).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
Vatter, Harold G., “Industrialization, Regional Change, and the Sectoral Distribution of the U.S. Labor Force, 1850–1880,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 23 (07 1975), pp. 739–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Adjustments to the Census Counts of Population and Labor Force: 1870, 1890, 1910” (Photocopy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1985).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Revised Estimates of the United States Workforce, 1800 to 1860,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert, eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, 1986), vol. 51, pp. 641–71.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Assessment and Revision of the Antebellum Census Labor Force Statistics: 1850 and 1860” (Photocopy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1986).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Estimation of the Farm/Nonfarm Distribution of Laborers, not otherwise specified; by State, 1850 to 1900” (Photocopy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1987).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Farm Gross Product, Labor Force and Output per Worker in the United States, 1800–1900” (Photocopy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1990).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “U.S. Labor Force Estimates and Economic Growth, 1800 to 1860,” in Wallis, John and Gallman, Robert, eds., American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War (Chicago, 1992), pp. 1975.Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, “Long-Term Changes in U.S. Agricultural Output per Worker, 1800–1900,” Economic History Review, 46 (05 1993), pp. 324–41.Google Scholar