Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:06:28.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elizabeth's Reformation in the Irish Pale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2015

HENRY A. JEFFERIES
HENRY A. JEFFERIES*
Affiliation:
Thornhill College, Derry E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is focused on Elizabeth's Reformation in the Irish Pale around Dublin, the key religious battleground in Tudor Ireland. It highlights the strength of opposition to Elizabeth's religious settlement from the start of her reign. It shows in stark terms that Ireland experienced a Reformation virtually without reformers, and suggests that that was a major reason for its failure. The contrasting experiences of England and the Pale suggest, in turn, that revisionist historians have underestimated the progress of Protestantism in England before Elizabeth's reign.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 524 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nicholas Canny, ‘Why the Reformation failed in Ireland: une question mal posée’, this Journal xxx (1979), 425. He proposed (p. 450) that the failure of the Reformation in Ireland was not absolute until the early nineteenth century.

2 SP Ireland, 63/150/74.

3 CSPI, 1600–1, ccvii/6, no. 126.

4 SP Ireland, 63/152/3.

5 Brady, W. M., State papers concerning the Irish Church, London 1868Google Scholar, no. lxix.

6 CSPI, 1600, ccvii/4, no. 3.

7 Jefferies, Henry A., ‘The Irish parliament of 1560: the Anglican reforms authorised’, IHS xxvi (1988), 128–41Google Scholar.

8 Ibid. and idem, The Irish Church and Tudor Reformations, Dublin 2010, 125–8Google Scholar.

9 The Irish fiants of the Tudor sovereigns, II: 1558–1586, ed. Kenneth Nicholl, nos 198, 199; Jefferies, Irish Church, 126. Christopher Bodkin, archbishop of Tuam, subscribed to the oath, but continued to sing mass daily in the cathedral in Tuam thereafter: Jefferies, Irish Church, 146–7.

10 Jefferies, Henry A., Priests and prelates of Armagh in the age of Reformations, Dublin 1997, 170Google Scholar.

11 Idem, Irish Church, 136.

12 Irish fiants, ii, no. 222.

13 Ibid. ii, no. 227.

14 Ibid. ii, no. 236; Scott, Brendan, Religion and Reformation in the Tudor diocese of Meath, Dublin 2006, 55Google Scholar.

15 ‘The device for alteration of religion’, quoted in Gee, Henry, The Elizabethan prayer book and ornaments, London 1902, 196Google Scholar.

16 Irish fiants, ii, nos 222, 227, 223, 221.

17 Ibid. ii, nos 223, 224.

18 Lennon, Colm, The lords of Dublin in the age of Reformation, Dublin 1989, 133–4Google Scholar.

19 Edwards, R. D., Church and State in Tudor Ireland: a history of penal laws against Irish Catholics, Dublin 1935, 270–1Google Scholar; Treadwell, Victor, ‘The Irish parliament of 1585–6’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy lxxxvC (1985), 274Google Scholar.

20 Treadwell, ‘Irish parliament of 1585–6’, 292–3.

21 Shirley, E. P., Original letters and papers … of the Church in Ireland under Edward VI, Mary and Elizabeth, London 1851Google Scholar, no. liii.

22 Ibid. no. liv.

23 Brady, State papers, no. v.

24 Shirley, Original letters, no. xliv.

25 CPCRI i. 489–90.

26 SP Ireland, 63/10/42; Shirley, Original letters, no. lxx.

27 James Murray, ‘The Tudor diocese of Dublin: episcopal government, ecclesiastical politics and the enforcement of the Reformation, c. 1534–1590’, unpubl. PhD diss. Trinity College Dublin 1997, 249.

28 Idem, Enforcing the English Reformation in Ireland: clerical resistance and political conflict in the diocese of Dublin, 1534–1590, Dublin 2009, 251–2Google Scholar.

29 Begley, J., The diocese of Limerick in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, London 1927Google Scholar.

30 Murray, ‘The Tudor diocese of Dublin’, 284.

31 Brady, State papers, no. xxii.

32 SP Ireland, 63/66/66.

33 Ibid.

34 Ibid. 63/74/75.

35 Jefferies, Irish Church, 171–2.

36 The proctors’ accounts of the parish church of St Werburgh, Dublin, 1481–1627, ed. Empey, Adrian, Dublin 2009, 12–13Google Scholar; Jefferies, Irish Church, 59–60.

37 Jefferies, Henry A., ‘The role of the laity in the parishes of Armagh inter Anglicos on the eve of the Tudor Reformations’, Arch. Hib. lii (1988), 77–8Google Scholar, and Irish Church, 60–1.

38 CSPI, 1600–1, ccvii/6, no. 126.

39 CPCRI, i. 435.

40 Shirley, Original letters, nos xxxv, xxxviii, xxxix, xli, xlii.

41 Ibid. nos xxxvii, xxxviii, xxxix, xlii.

42 Jefferies, Irish Church, 132–3.

43 Shirley, Original letters, nos xxxvi, xxxvii.

44 Ibid. no. cii.

45 Ibid. no. liv.

46 Ibid. no. lxxv.

47 Brady, State papers, no, xi.

48 SP Ireland 63/113/58; Brady, State papers, no. lxv.

49 SP Ireland, 63/131/64; Brady, State papers, no. lxxxvii.

50 SP Ireland, 63/207, pt 4/3; Jefferies, Irish Church, 246.

51 Brady, State papers, no. lxvi.

52 Jefferies, Irish Church, 149–53.

53 ‘Visitations of the dioceses of Clonfert, Tuam and Kilmacduagh, c.1565–7’, ed. Kenneth Nicholls, Arch. Hib. xxvi (1970), 146, 151, 155, 156; Canny, ‘Why the Reformation failed’, 444–5.

54 SP Ireland, 63/82/58.

55 Ibid. 63/85/39.

56 Jefferies, Irish Church, 220–7, 242–4.

57 Shirley, Original letters, no. lxxxii.

58 SP Ireland, 63/24/2.

59 Ibid. 63/18/13; Shirley, Original letters, no. xcii.

60 SP Ireland, 63/34/13.

61 Jefferies, Irish Church, 224–7.

62 SP Ireland, 63/131/64; Brady, State papers, no. lxxxvii.

63 Brady, State papers, no. lxxxvii.

64 SP Ireland, 63/113/58; Brady, State papers, no. lxv.

65 Brady, State papers, no. xi.

66 Spenser, Edmund, A view of the state of Ireland, London 1809 edn, 142Google Scholar.

67 SP Ireland, 63/207, pt 3/139.

68 Ibid. 63/144/35; Canny, ‘Why the Reformation failed’, 433.

69 Shirley, Original letters, no. lxxxii.

70 Ibid. no. lxxiii.

71 Ibid. no. liii.

72 SP Ireland, 63/58/16.

73 Ibid. 63/38/16.

74 Ibid. 63/56/27; 63/55/59.

75 Ibid. 63/23/18.

76 Ibid. 63/94/37.

77 Ibid. 63/144/35; Canny, ‘Why the Reformation failed’, 433.

78 Lennon, Lords of Dublin, 130, 145–7, 149, 150–1, 163, 186, 215.

79 Ibid. 142, 143, 147, 149, 150.

80 Ibid. 134, 141, 142.

81 SP Ireland, 63/10/42.

82 Tait, Clodagh, ‘“As legacie upon my soul”: the wills of the Irish Catholic community, c.1550–c. 1660’, in Armstrong, Robert and hAnnracháin, Tadhg Ó (eds), Community in early modern Ireland, Dublin 2006, 188Google Scholar.

83 SP Ireland, 63/207, pt 6/141.

84 Canny, ‘Why the Reformation failed’, 437; Brady, Ciarán, ‘Conservative subversives: the community of the Pale and the Dublin administration, 1556–1586’, in Corish, P. J. (ed.), Radicals, rebels and establishments, Belfast 1985, 16–29Google Scholar.

85 Jefferies, Irish Church, 214–19, 259–75.

86 SP Ireland, 63/140/22.

87 Haigh, Christopher, Reformation and resistance in Tudor Lancashire, Cambridge 1975, 317Google Scholar.

88 Henry A. Jefferies, ‘The early Tudor Reformations in the Irish Pale’, this Journal lii (2001), 34–40.

89 Haigh, Christopher, The English Reformation revised, Cambridge 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and English Reformations: religion, politics and society under the Tudors, Oxford 1993Google Scholar; Duffy, Eamon, The stripping of the altars: traditional religion in England, 1400–1580, New Haven–London 1992Google Scholar. See now Bernard, G. W., The late medieval English Church: vitality and vulnerability before the break with Rome, New Haven 2012Google Scholar. Bernard effectively vindicates the ‘revisionist’ interpretation despite his efforts to balance ‘vitality’ and ‘vulnerability’ (pp. 71, 86, 116, 236–7).

90 Shagan, Ethan, Popular politics and the English Reformation, Cambridge 2003, 13–14, 22Google Scholar.

91 Bradshaw, Brendan, ‘The opposition to the ecclesiastical legislation in the Irish Reformation parliament’, IHS xvi (1969), 285–303Google Scholar; The dissolution of the religious orders in Ireland under Henry VIII, Cambridge 1974Google Scholar; and ‘The Edwardian Reformation in Ireland’, Arch. Hib. xxvi (1976–7), 83–99; Jefferies, ‘Early Tudor Reformations’, 34–67, and Irish Church, 75–87, 88–103.

92 Bradshaw, ‘Edwardian Reformation’, 83–99; Jefferies, Irish Church, 94–101.

93 Shagan, Popular politics, 10–17.

94 It is possible that the decree endorsed by the provincial synod of Armagh ordering the burning of heretical books in 1553 reflected the availability of such work in Ireland, but that is not certain: Jefferies, Priests and prelates of Armagh, 166.

95 Shirley, Original letters, no. v; Jefferies, Irish Church, 89–90.

96 Bale, John, ‘The vocacyon of John Bale, bishop of Ossory’, Harleian Miscellany 6, ed. Park, T., London 1813, 455Google Scholar.

97 Shirley, Original letters, no. xvii; Jefferies, Irish Church, 91–2.

98 Ellis, S. G., ‘John Bale, bishop of Ossory, 1552–3’, Journal of the Butler Society iii/2 (1984), 283–93Google Scholar; Jefferies, Irish Church, 100–2.

99 Bale, ‘Vocacyon’, 448–9.

100 Ibid. 450.

101 Strype, John, Memorials of the most reverend father in God Thomas Cranmer, sometime lord archbishop of Canterbury, ii, Oxford 1840 edn, 399–401Google Scholar. Note, however, that Ireland did not feature much in Cranmer's thoughts: Diarmaid MacCulloch, Thomas Cranmer, New Haven–London 1996, passimGoogle Scholar.

102 Bale, ‘Vocacyon’, 449.

103 For England see Duffy, Stripping of the altars, 448–503, and Saints, sacrilege and sedition: religion and conflict in the Tudor Reformations, London 2012, 109–29Google Scholar. Irish fiants, no. 181, suggests that there were some losses in the Irish Pale, perhaps pre-emptive disposals of church goods by parishioners fearful of crown confiscations, yet nothing comparable to the losses suffered across England.

104 Jefferies, Henry A., ‘The Kildare revolt: accident or design?’, JCKAHS xix (2004–5), 447–59Google Scholar, and ‘Early Tudor Reformations’, 44–7.

105 Ó Clabaigh, Colmán, The friars in Ireland, 1224–1540, Dublin 2012, 53–86Google Scholar, 285–317.

106 Jefferies, ‘The role of the laity’, 75–83, and Irish Church, 56–68.

107 Idem, Priests and prelates of Armagh, 21–6, 66–8; O'Neill, Michael, ‘The medieval parish churches of County Meath’, Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland cxxxii (2002), 1–57Google Scholar; ‘St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, and its prebendal churches: gothic architectural relationships’, in Duffy, Seán (ed.), Medieval Dublin V, Dublin 2004, 243–76Google Scholar; and ‘The medieval parish churches of Kildare’, JCKAHS xix (2004–5), 406–46Google Scholar; Jefferies, Irish Church, 15–22.

108 In Armagh diocese only five graduates have been identified among the diocesan clergy inter Anglicos in the early sixteenth century: Jefferies, Priests and prelates of Armagh, 39.

109 Lennon, Lords of Dublin, 156, 157, 213–14; Jefferies, Irish Church, 189, 200, 263, 281, 282.

110 Murray, James, ‘Ecclesiastical justice and the enforcement of the Reformation: the case of Archbishop Browne and the clergy of Dublin’, in Ford, A., McGuire, F. and Milne, K. (eds), As by law established: the Church of Ireland since the Reformation, Dublin 1995, 50–1Google Scholar.

111 Scott, Religion and Reformation, 48–51.

112 Shirley, Original letters, no. xxiii.

113 Duffy, Stripping of the altars, 504–23.

114 Idem, Fires of faith: Catholic England under Mary Tudor, New Haven–London 2009, 10Google Scholar.

115 Shagan, Popular politics, 23, 303.

116 Lennon, Lords of Dublin, 128, 130; Jefferies, ‘Early Tudor Reformations’, 55–62.

117 Duffy, Fires of faith, passim.

118 More generally it suggests that the magisterial Reformations across Europe could only have succeeded by virtue of the support that they enjoyed from a significant proportion of the ruling elites, and the acquiescence of most of the rest of the population.