Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:09:06.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade Versus Security: How Countries Balance Technology Transfers with China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Tai Ming Cheung  and
Bates Gill
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Apart from a short period in the 1980s, the People's Republic of China has been almost completely excluded from access to military and sensitive dual-use civilian-military technologies from the United States and its allies. But in an era of globalization and convergence in the civilian and military technological domains, this compartmentalization of the economic and security arenas has become increasingly difficult to maintain and justify. Major trading countries are caught in the dilemma of balancing restrictions on high technology and other sensitive trade and investment with China against the benefits of deeper ties with the world's second-largest economy. In examining the trade-offs between economics and national security for the United States, the European Union, Israel, and Japan, it becomes clear that China's rise and growing economic and strategic influence introduce new complexities and challenges for controlling militarily relevant technology and knowledge transfers.

Keywords

ChinaIsraelJapantechnology transferexport control regimestrade-security trade-off
Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 443 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Bertsch, Gary, and Elliott-Gower, Steven, eds. 1992. Export Controls in Transition: Perspectives, Problems, and Prospects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Science, Security, and Prosperity. 2009. Beyond “Fortress America”: National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Beverly. 1995. “Hawks, Doves, but No Owls: International Economic Interdependence and Construction of the New Security Dilemma.” In On Security , ed. Lipschutz, R.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cupitt, Richard T. 2000. Reluctant Champions: U.S. Presidential Policy and Strategic Export Controls, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush, and Clinton. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fergusson, Ian. 2009. The Export Administration Act: Evolution, Provisions, and Debate. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Fergusson, Ian, and Kerr, Paul. 2013. The U.S. Export Control System and the President's Reform Initiative. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Fruchart, Damien, Holtom, Paul, Wezeman, Siemon T., Strandow, Daniel, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2007. United Nations Arms Embargoes: Their Impact on Arms Flows and Target Behaviour. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
Meijer, Hugo. 2013. “Trading with the Enemy: The Making of U.S. Export Control Policy Toward the People's Republic of China.” PhD diss., Institut d'Etudes Politiques (Sciences Po), Paris.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1991. Finding Common Ground: U.S. Export Controls in a Changed Global Environment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar