Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:28:01.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teat thickness changes may provide biological test for effective pulsation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Jörn Hamann  and
Graeme A. Mein
Jörn Hamann
Affiliation:
Institut für Hygiene, Bundesanstalt für Milchforschung, Hermann-Weigmann-Strasse 1, D-24103 Kiel, Deutschland
Graeme A. Mein
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, W1 53706, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pulsation rates of 40, 60 and 80 cycles/min were combined with pulsator ratios of 50, 60, 70 or 80% in two experiments with different liners. Machine-induced, short-term changes in teat thickness of 14 cows were compared with milk flow rate characteristics and machine strip yields to evaluate the effectiveness of pulsation in relation to liner type. Post-milking teat thickness increased progressively as the b phase of the pulsation cycle was lengthened, and as the d phase was shortened, at all pulsator rates and with either liner. Teat thickness values increased significantly (P < 0·05) when the d phase was <15%. For ratios of 50 and 60%, teat thickness decreased progressively as pulsation rate was increased. At the higher ratios, thickness values were lowest at 60 cycles/min. Pulsation settings that tended to increase teat thickness values also increased both peak milk flow rates and machine strip yields. The influence of liner type on teat thickness changes appeared to be at least as important as the influence of pulsator ratios and greater than the effect of pulsation rate. If so, then international standards for acceptable pulsation characteristics cannot be defined solely in terms of pulsator settings. A limit of ±5% for machine-induced changes in thickness of the teat apex would be an additional guideline for effectiveness of pulsation in relation to both liner type and vacuum level. This could provide a basis for a dynamic test applied to milking cows under field conditions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , May 1996 , pp. 179 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bramley, A. J., Griffin, T. K. & Grindal, R. J. 1978 Some investigations on the effect of continuous vacuum milking on new infection of the udder. Proceedings, Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Council 17 291–300Google Scholar
Bramley, A. J. & Schultze, W. D. 1991 Effect of milking without pulsation on teat duct colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and penetrability to endotoxin. Journal of Dairy Science 74 2982–2988CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institution 1988 Milking machine installations. Part 2. Specification for construction and performance. Part 3. Methods for mechanical testing. London: BSI (BS 5545)Google Scholar
Clough, P. A. 1972 Pipeline milking machines and milking systems. Agricultural Engineer 27 17–24Google Scholar
Clough, P. A. & Dodd, F. A. 1956 Effect of pulsation rate and ratio on milking rate. Agriculture 63 334–335Google Scholar
Deutsches Tnstitut Für Normung (DIN) 1985 [Milking machine installations. Construction and performance.] Berlin: Beuth-Verlag (DIN 5707)Google Scholar
Hamann, J. 1985 Measurement of machine milking induced teat tissue reactions. Milchwissenschaft 40 16–18Google Scholar
Hamann, J. 1987 Effect of machine milking on teat end condition: a literature review. In Machine Milking and Mastitis, pp. 33–39. Brussels: International Dairy Federation (IDF B-DOC 215)Google Scholar
Hamann, J. 1990 Milking hygiene, milking and mastitis. Proceedings, International Symposium on Bovine Mastitis, Indianapolis, pp. 210–220. Kentucky: National Mastitis CouncilGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. 1992 Physio-pathological aspects of machine milking. Proceedings, International Symposium on Bovine Mastitis, Milan, pp. 53–67Google Scholar
Hamann, J. & Mein, G. A. 1988 Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex. Journal of Dairy Research 55 331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. & Mein, G. A. 1990 Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat. Journal of Dairy Research 57 495–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J., Mein, G. A. & Wetzel, S. 1993 Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. Journal of Dairy Science 76 1040–1046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J., Nipp, B. & Persson, K. 1994 Teat tissue reactions to milking. Changes in blood flow and thickness in the bovine teat. Milchwissenschaft 49 243–247Google Scholar
Hamann, J. & Stanitzke, U. 1990 [Investigation of the pathogenesis of bovine mastitis by comparison of suckling, handmilking, and machine milking: reactions of the teat tissue.] Milchwissenschaft 45 632–637Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization 1983 Milking machine installations—construction and performance. Geneva: IOS (ISO Standard no. 5707)Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization 1995 Milking machine installation – construction and performance. Geneva: IOS (ISO/DIS Draft Standard no. 5707)Google Scholar
Jackson, E. R. 1970 An outbreak of teat sores in a commercial dairy herd possibly associated with milking machine faults. Veterinary Record 87 2–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, B. 1990 Preliminary results concerning teat tip consistency and temperature due to linerless and conventional milking. Milchwissenschaft 45 291–294Google Scholar
Mein, G. A. 1992 Action of the cluster during milking. In Machine Milking and Lactation, pp. 118–212 (Eds Bramley, A. J., Dodd, F. H., Mein, G. A. and Bramley, J. A.). Berkshire, UK: Insight BooksGoogle Scholar
Mein, G. A., Brown, M. R. & Williams, D. M. 1983 Pulsation failure as a consequence of milking with short teatcup liners. Journal of Dairy Research 50 249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mein, G. A., Williams, D. M. & Thiel, C. C. 1987 Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat. Journal of Dairy Research 54 327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, F. K. 1959 Milking machines and mastitis. In Machine Milking, pp. 104–160. London: HM Stationery Office (MAFF Bulletin no. 177)Google Scholar
Nordic Dairy Associations′ Committee Concerning Milking 1988 Nordic recommendations for milking machine plants: function, dimensions and installationGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J.O'Callaghan, E. & Meaney, W. J. 1984 Effect of machine milking on new mastitis infections. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 23 155–171Google Scholar
OsterÅs, O., Ronningen, O., Sandvik, L. & Waage, S. 1995 Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 62 1–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitsma, S. Y., Cant, E. J., Grindal, R. J., Westgarth, D. R. & Bramley, A. J. 1981 Effect of duration of teatcup liner closure per pulsation cycle on bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 64 2240–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronningen, O. & Reitan, A. D. 1990 Teat length and penetration into teat cup during milking in Norwegian Red cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 57 165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudovsky, H. -J., Hoffmann, H. -W. & Wehowsky, G. 1992 [Effect of stimulation and machine milking on the consistency of the tissues of the teat ends.] Proceedings, International Colloquium, Stimulation and Milking, Leipzig, pp. 227–238Google Scholar
SAS 1987 SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, v. 6. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Schultze, W. D. & Bright, S. C. 1983 Changes in penetrability of bovine papillary duct to endotoxin after milking. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44 2373–2375Google ScholarPubMed
Whittlestone, W. G. 1961 The Principles of Mechanical Milking, pp. 8.11–8.12. Sydney: New South Wales Milk BoardGoogle Scholar
Zecconi, A., Hamann, J., Bronzo, V. & Ruffo, G. 1992 Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free from contagious mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research 59 265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar