Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:49:26.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of porous glass chromatography for size-fractionation of bovine casein micelles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gerald P. McNeill
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Irish Republic
William J. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Agricultural Institute, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Irish Republic

Summary

Permeation chromatography on porous glass was carried out with skim milk at 20 or 30 °C using CPG-10 (50 nm) or a dual column system of CPG-10 (50 nm) followed by CPG-10 (300 nm). On columns of CPG-10 (50 nm) casein micelles were eluted at the void volume and were rapidly and efficiently resolved from non-micellar protein without micelle dissociation. The dual column system resulted in the additional resolution of the micelles into different size ranges. Examination of the resolved micelle fractions by electron microscopy showed a gradual decrease of weight average diameter (Dw) from 228·4 nm in the void volume fraction to 86·3 nm in the smallest micelle fraction. The translucent upper layer of a micelle sediment obtained by ultracentrifugation of skim milk at 30 °C consisted of casein aggregates intermediate in size between monomeric protein and the bulk micelle fraction as shown by its elution behaviour on CPG-10 (50 nm). These aggregates were enriched more than 2-fold with κ-casein relative to skim milk, were devoid of αs2-casein and had an estimated value of Dw of 33 nm. The ultracentrifugate serum contained ∼ 2·5% of total milk casein which had the elution characteristics of monomeric protein on CPG-10 (50 nm). It was concluded that the translucent sediment consisted of the smallest micelle fraction of skim milk and represented the minimum size range for casein polymerization in the natural milk environment. Overall, the results show that porous glass chromatography is an effective and convenient tool for the isolation and study of casein micelles.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almlöf, E., Larsson-Raźnikiewicz, M., Lindqvist, I. & Munyua, J. 1977 Fractionation by size of casein micelles on controlled-pore glass. Preparative Biochemistry 7 17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. G. & Donnelly, W. J. 1981 Casein compositional studies. II. The effect of secretory disturbance on casein composition in freshly drawn and aged bovine milks. Journal of Dairy Research 48 437446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. T. & Law, A. J. R. 1983 Variation in the protein composition of bovine casein micelles and serum casein in relation to micellar size and milk temperature. Journal of Dairy Research 50 6775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, W. J., Barry, J. G. & Richardson, T. 1980 14C-methylated β-casein as a substrate for plasmin, and its application to the study of milk protein transformations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 626 117126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, W. J., Mcneill, G. P., Buchheim, W. & Mcgann, T. C. A. 1984 A comprehensive study of the relationship between size and protein composition in bovine casein micelles. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 789 136143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, M. C. A. & Anderson, M. 1983 The determination of casein micelle size distribution in skim milk by chromatography and photon correlation spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 748 453459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcgann, T. C. A., Kearney, R. D. & Donnelly, W. J. 1979 Developments in column chromatography for the separation and characterization of casein micelles. Journal of Dairy Research 46 307311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcgann, T. C. A. & Pyne, G. T. 1960 The colloidal phosphate of milk. III. Nature of its association with casein. Journal of Dairy Research 27 403417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morr, C. V., Josephson, R. V., Jenness, R. & Manning, P. B. 1971 Composition and properties of submicellar casein complexes in colloidal phosphate-free skimmilk. Journal of Dairy Science 54 15551563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., Davies, D. T. & Yaguchi, M. 1969 Quantitative determination of the major components of casein mixtures by column chromatography on DEAE-cellulose. Journal of Dairy Science 52 811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. 1982 In Developments in Dairy Chemistry—I. Proteins pp. 6186 (Ed. Fox, P. F.). London: Applied Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. & Payens, T. A. J. 1972 The evaluation of positive and negative contributions to the second virial coefficient of some milk proteins. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 39 655662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slattery, C. W. 1977 Model calculations of casein micelle size distributions. Biophysical Chemistry 6 5964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. A., Fitzpatrick, M. M. & Stanton, E. K. 1959 Distribution of kappa-casein in skim milk. Nature 183 616617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waugh, D. F. & Talbot, B. 1971 Equilibrium casein micelle systems. Biochemistry 10 41534162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed