Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:28:29.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milkability of Holstein cows is significantly affected by the incidence of clinical mastitis for weeks after diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Matúš Gašparík*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Luděk Stádník
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Jaromír Ducháček
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Marek Vrhel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: Matúš Gašparík, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The main objective of this research communication was to explore the extent of milkability changes caused by the incidence of clinical mastitis. Our second objective was to investigate if the milkability of cows shortly before mastitis incidence significantly differed in comparison with healthy cows. Milk yield, milking time, average milk flow, partial milk flows and the occurrence of bimodal milk flows were monitored during the first 120 d in milk for all cows that calved on the farm during the experimental period (n = 127). A veterinarian diagnosed 27 cows with clinical mastitis, while the remaining healthy cows served as a control group. The period surrounding the mastitis was monitored in a timeline from 2 weeks before to 4 weeks after the diagnosis. We did not observe any significant differences in milkability between the healthy cows and the cows in the pre-mastitis period, which suggests that monitoring these might not be useful for early mastitis detection. Milk yield and milk flow were significantly decreased in the week of mastitis diagnosis compared to the pre-mastitis period. Milking time was not affected in the week of diagnosis, but was significantly increased in the following week, because milk yield returned to pre-mastitis values, but average milk flow was still significantly decreased. Milk yield was normalized to pre-mastitis values as the first of monitored parameters. Milk flow returned to pre-mastitis values in the fourth week after mastitis diagnosis. Milking time was the only parameter that was significantly affected up to a month after diagnosis. Our results showed that milkability changes caused by mastitis are significant and should not be ignored. The ability to adjust milking settings for cows diagnosed with mastitis could become a useful tool for improving mastitis treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, T, Cuthbertson, EM, Greenall, RK, Hannah, MC, Jongman, E and Shoesmith, D (2004) Milking regimes to shorten milking duration. Journal of Dairy Research 71, 419426.10.1017/S0022029904000421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Boyer des Roches, A, Faure, M, Lussert, A, Herry, V, Rainard, P, Durand, D and Foucras, G (2017) Behavioral and patho-physiological response as possible signs of pain in dairy cows during Escherichia coli mastitis: a pilot study. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 83858397.10.3168/jds.2017-12796CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gašparík, M, Ducháček, J, Stádník, L and Nováková, V (2018) Impact of milking settings optimization on milk quality, milking time and milk yield in Holstein cows. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 420, 012073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindal, RJ, Walton, AW and Hillerton, JE (1991) Influence of milk flow rate and streak canal length on new intramammary infection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58, 383388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagnestam, C, Emanuelson, U and Berglund, B (2007) Yield losses associated with clinical mastitis occurring in different weeks of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 22602270.10.3168/jds.2006-583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koeck, A, Loker, S, Miglior, F, Kelton, DF, Jamrozik, J and Schenkel, FS (2014) Genetic relationships of clinical mastitis, cystic ovaries, and lameness with milk yield and somatic cell score in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 58065813.10.3168/jds.2013-7785CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mijić, P, Knežević, I and Domaćinović, M (2004) Connection of milk flow curve to the somatic cell count in bovine milk. Archiv fur Tierzucht – Archives of Animal Breeding 47, 551556.10.5194/aab-47-551-2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruegg, PL (2017) A 100-year review: mastitis detection, management, and prevention. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 1038110397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandrucci, A, Tamburini, A, Bava, L and Zucali, M (2007) Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of field study. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 11591167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tančin, V and Uhrinčať, M (2014) The effect of somatic cell on milk yield and milk flow at quarter level. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 66, 6972.Google Scholar
Tančin, V, Ipema, B, Hogewerf, P and Mačuhová, J (2006) Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 978988.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72163-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tančin, V, Ipema, AH and Hogewerf, P (2007) Interaction of somatic cell count and quarter milk flow patterns. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 22232228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Gašparík et al. supplementary material

Gašparík et al. supplementary material

Download Gašparík et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 233.3 KB