Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:31:35.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The growth of aerobic spore-forming bacilli in sterilized milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Constance Higginbottom
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Margaret M. Taylor
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr

Summary

The sterilization of homogenized milk at 115·5°C for 15 min in bottles having a partial vacuum in the headspace produced conditions inhibitory to the growth from very small numbers of spores of Bacillus subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. cereus and B. brevis when compared with growth in the same milk sterilized in open bottles. B. circulans differed from the other strains tested in showing greater inhibition in milk sterilized in open bottles than in milk sterilized under partial vacuum.

The extent of the inhibition became less as the size of the inoculum was increased. It became less also as the temperature of incubation approached the optimum growth temperature of the bacillus, and was influenced by the strain of the bacillus and the source of the milk but not by the degree of heat treatment within the range 107–117·5°C for 15 min. Inhibition was manifested by a prolongation of the lag phase, and in addition with some strains inhibition of spore germination could be demonstrated.

Spore formation following vegetative growth occurred more readily in milk sterilized in open than in evacuated bottles.

Milks sterilized under partial vacuum frequently failed to show any growth from small inocula in 30 days at 22°C although growth occurred readily in milk sterilized in open bottles.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burton, H., Akam, D. N., Thiel, C. C., Grinsted, E. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1953). J. Soc. Dairy Tech. 6, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candy, M. R. & Nichols, A. A. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, H. R. & Evans, F. R. (1947). J. Bact. 53, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. G., Williams, D. J. & Clegg, L. F. L. (1956). J. appl. Bact. 19, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grelet, N. (1952). Ann. Inst. Past. 82, 310.Google Scholar
Higginbottom, C. & Taylor, M. M. (1960 a). J. Dairy Res. 27, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, C. & Taylor, M. M. (1960 b). J. Dairy Res. 27, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, J. D. (1955). J. appl. Bact. 18, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. R., Gordon, R. E. & Clark, F. E. (1952). Agric. Monogr. no. 16.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. M. (1956). Proc. xivth Int. Dairy Congr. 1 (2), 487.Google Scholar
The Milk (Special Designations) (Pasteurized and Sterilized Milk) Regulations, 1949. Statutory Instruments no. 1589. Food and Drugs, England.Google Scholar
The Milk (Special Designations) (Scotland) Order, 1951. Statutory Instruments no. 644. (S.31). Milk and Dairies, Scotland.Google Scholar
Wolf, J. & Mahmoud, S. A. Z. (1957). J. appl. Bact. 20, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, E. S. (1952). Bact. Rev. 16, 101Google Scholar