Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:30:19.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of supplementary inulin on ewes milk composition and rumen fermentation parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2022

Hamid Paya*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Ilias Giannenas
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Akbar Taghizadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Ali Hosseinkhani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Valiollah Palangi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
Karim Hasanpur
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Tugay Ayasan
Affiliation:
Department of Organic Farming Business Management, Kadirli Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Korkut Ata, Osmaniye, Turkey
Mehri Montazerharzand
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Shahram Shirmohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Naser Elmi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Complex Biological Systems and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
*
Authors for correspondence: Hamid Paya, Valiollah Palangi Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Authors for correspondence: Hamid Paya, Valiollah Palangi Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of inulin supplementation on milk production and composition, feed intake, nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters in lactating ewes. The experimental treatments were (1) control group (basal diet), (2) basal diet plus 2% inulin (w/w) and (3) basal diet plus 4% inulin (w/w). The experiment was carried out for 21 d in a fully randomized design involving eighteen Ghezel ewes. Production and composition (percentages of fat, protein, lactose and fat-free solids and fatty acid profiles) of milk were measured. Faeces were collected in the last 3 days of the experiment to determine digestibility. On the last day of the experiment, rumen fluid samples were taken from the esophagus 3 h after feeding and fermentation parameters (pH, ammonia nitrogen (N-NH3), volatile fatty acids (VFA) and protozoal population) were examined. Daily milk production was not significantly affected by inulin supplementation, but the fat and protein content of the milk was increased whilst urea nitrogen (MUN) and unsaturated fatty acids were decreased (P < 0.05). The dry matter (DM) intake results showed that there was no significant difference between different diets. The highest digestibility of DM and NDF belonged to the inulin fed group (P < 0.05). Inulin consumption numerically increased the pH of the rumen fluid of the animals and significantly decreased the rumen N-NH3 value (P < 0.05). Inulin supplementation also significantly increased total VFA, acetate, and butyrate levels (P < 0.05). In general, it can be concluded that inulin supplementation can improve rumen fermentation, DM and NDF digestibility,as well as compositional aspects of the ewe's milk production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis, 18th Edn. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Ayala-Monter, MA, Hernández-Sánchez, D, González-Muñoz, S, Pinto-Ruiz, R, Martínez-Aispuro, JA, Torres-Salado, N and Gloria-Trujillo, A (2019) Growth performance and health of nursing lambs supplemented with inulin and Lactobacillus casei. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 32, 11371143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birmani, MW, Nawab, A, Ghani, MW, Li, G, Xiao, M and An, L (2019) A review: role of inulin in animal nutrition. Journal of Food Technology Research 6, 1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, GA and Kang, JH (1980) Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 6475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csernus, B and Czeglédi, L (2020) Physiological, antimicrobial, intestine morphological, and immunological effects of fructooligosaccharides in pigs. Archives Animal Breeding 63, 325335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, B, Chen, L, Lin, H, Wang, X, Zhang, L, Ni, X, Pirone, A, Madigosky, SR and Fronte, B (2021) Effects of inulin diet supplementation on production performance, gut traits, and incidence of ascites in Haidong chicks under hypoxic conditions. Animal Bioscience 34, 417426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erasmus, LJ, Botha, PM and Kistner, A (1992) Effect of yeast culture supplement on production, rumen fermentation, and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 30563065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firkins, JL, Yu, Z and Morrison, M (2007). Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. Journal of Dairy Science 90(Suppl. E.), E1E16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez-Garcia, RA, McCubbin, T, Navone, L, Stowers, C, Nielsen, LK and Marcellin, E (2017) Microbial propionic acid production. Fermentation 3, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M, Petit, HV, Chiquette, J and Wright, ADG (2013) Rumen fermentation and microbial population in lactating dairy cows receiving diets containing oilseeds rich in C-18 fatty acids. British Journal of Nutrition 109, 12111218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafilzadeh, F, Payandeh, S, Gómez-Cortés, P, Ghadimi, D, Schiavone, A and Martínez Marín, AL (2019) Effects of probiotic supplementation on milk production, blood metabolite profile and enzyme activities of ewes during lactation. Italian Journal of Animal Science 18, 134139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z, Deng, Q, Liu, Y, Yan, L, Li, F, Cao, Y and Yao, J (2018) Dynamics of methanogenesis, ruminal fermentation and fiber digestibility in ruminants following elimination of protozoa: a meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 9, 89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, ZI, Yang, DP, Chen, P, Lin, SB, Jiang, XY, Zhao, WS, Li, JM and Dong, WX (2008) Effect of dietary sources of roasted oilseeds on blood parameters and milk fatty acid composition. Czech Journal of Animal Science 53, 219226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marais, JP (2000) Use of markers. In D'Mello, JPF (ed.), Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition, 1st Edn. pp 264266. UK: CABI Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Fonty, G and Michalet-Doreau, B (2002) Factors affecting the fibrolytic activity of the digestive microbial ecosystems in ruminants. In Martin, SA (ed.), Gastrointestinal Microbiology in Animals. pp 117. Trivandrum: Research Signpost; 2002117.Google Scholar
Moharrery, A, Larsen, M and Weisbjerg, MR (2014) Starch digestion in the rumen, small intestine, and hind gut of dairy cows – A meta-analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 192, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudannayake, DC, Wimalasiri, KM, Silva, KF and Ajlouni, S (2015) Comparison of properties of new sources of partially purified inulin to those of commercially pure chicory inulin. Journal of Food Science 80, C950C960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mwenya, B, Santoso, B, Sar, C, Pen, B, Morikawa, R, Takaura, K, Umetsu, K, Kimura, K and Takahashi, J (2005) Effects of yeast culture and galacto-oligosaccharides on ruminal fermentation in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 14041412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (2007) Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, DC, US: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, QV, Le, HV, Nguyen, DV, Nish, P, Otto, JR, Malau-Aduli, BS, Nichols, PD and Malau-Aduli, AEO (2018) Supplementing dairy ewes grazing low quality pastures with plant-derived and rumen-protected oils containing eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid pellets increases body condition score and milk, fat, and protein yields. Animals 8, 241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özturk, H (2009) Effects of chicory inulin on ruminal fermentation in vitro. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 56, 171175.Google Scholar
Paya, H and Taghizadeh, A (2020) Dry matter intake, milk yield and milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows fed raw or microwave irradiated safflower seed as a substitution to cottonseed. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 10, 5158.Google Scholar
Russell, JB and Wilson, DB (1996) Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? Journal of Dairy Science 79, 15CI311509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santoso, B, Mwenya, B, Sar, C, Gamo, Y, Kobayashi, T and Morikawa, R (2004) Effects of supplementing galacto-oligosaccharids, Yucca schidigra or nisin on rumen metanogenesis, nitrogen and energy metabolism in sheep. Livestock Production Science 91, 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc (2018) SAS 9.4M6, SAS® Studio User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sjaunja, LO, Baevre, L, Junkkarinen, L, Pedersen, J and Setala, J (1990) A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. In: Proc. 27th Session of International Committee of Recording and Productivity of Milk Animal. Paris, France, pp. 156157.Google Scholar
Sutton, JD, Broster, WH, Napper, DJ and Siviter, JW (1985) Feeding frequency for lactating cows: effects on digestion, milk production and energy utilization. British Journal of Nutrition 117, 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajaddini, MA, Dayani, O, Khezri, A, Tahmasbi, R and Sharifi-Hoseini, MM (2021) Production efficiency, milk yield, and milk composition and fatty acids profile of lactating goats feeding formaldehyde-treated canola meal in two levels of dietary crude protein. Small Ruminant Research 204, 106519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, K, Liu, J, Sun, Y, Wu, Y, Chen, J, Zhang, R, He, T and Dong, G (2019) Effects of dietary supplementation of inulin on rumen fermentation and bacterial microbiota, inflammatory response and growth performance in finishing beef steers fed high or low-concentrate diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 258, 114299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Nan, X, Zhao, Y, Jiang, L, Wang, H, Hua, D, Zhang, F, Wang, Y, Liu, J, Yao, J and Xiong, B (2020). Effect of supplementation of inulin in dietary on lactation performance, rumen fermentation, ruminal microbial pro¦le and metabolites in dairy cows. Research Square doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-130241/v1.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Nan, X, Zhao, Y, Jiang, L, Wang, H, Hua, D, Zhang, F, Wang, Y, Liu, J, Yao, J and Xiong, B (2021 a) Dietary supplementation with inulin improves lactation performance and serum lipids by regulating the rumen microbiome and metabolome in dairy cows. Animal Nutrition 7, 11891204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Nan, X, Zhao, Y, Jiang, L, Wang, H, Zhang, F, Hua, D, Liu, J, Yao, J, Yang, L, Luo, Q and Xiong, B (2021 b) Dietary supplementation of inulin ameliorates subclinical mastitis via regulation of rumen microbial community and metabolites in dairy cows. Microbiology Spectrum 9, e00105–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, MY, Sun, HZ, Wu, XH, Guan, LL and Liu, JX (2019) Assessment of rumen bacteria in dairy cows with varied milk protein yield. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 50315041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Paya et al. supplementary material

Paya et al. supplementary material

Download Paya et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 111.7 KB