Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:18:47.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation and fractionation of goat κ-casein: analysis of the glycan and peptide components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Francesco Addeo
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines and France
Solange Soulier
Affiliation:
† Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Lactation, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, CNRZ, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Jean-Pierre Pelissier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines and France
Jean-Marc Chobert
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines and France
Jean-Claude Mercier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines and France
Bruno Ribadeau-Dumas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches sur les Protéines and France

Summary

Whole goat κ-casein was prepared by chromatography of whole casein on hydroxyapatite. Chromatography of whole κ-casein on DEAE-cellulose separated 5 fractions. All of them were sensitive to chymosin. Their amino acid and carbohydrate composition, phosphate content and molecular weight were determined. Galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetyl and N-glycolyl neuraminic acids were identified in whole κ-casein. It appears that goat κ-casein, like cow, buffalo and ewe κ-caseins, is composed of several fractions having identical peptide chains and differing in their carbohydrate contents. The main fraction, devoid of carbohydrate, was treated with chymosin. The para-κ-casein and caseinomacropeptide were isolated. Their amino acid composition and phosphate content were determined.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addeo, F., Chobert, J. M. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 63.Google Scholar
Addeo, F., Mercier, J. C. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 455.Google Scholar
Alais, C. & Jollès, P. (1961). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 51, 315.Google Scholar
Bamann, E., Novotny, E. & Rohr, L. (1948). Chemische Berichte 81, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jollès, P., Alais, C. & Jollès, J. (1961). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 51, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jollès, J., Fiat, A. M., Schoentgen, F., Alais, C. & Jollès, P. (1974). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 365, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, J. C., Addeo, F. & Pèlissier, J. P. (1976). Biochimie 58, 1303.Google Scholar
Mercier, J. C., Brignon, G. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1973). European Journal of Biochemistry 35, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, J. C., Maubois, J. L., Poznanski, S. & Ribadeau-Dumas, B. (1968). Bulletin de la Société de Chimie Biologique 50, 521.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. C., Creamer, L. K. & Munford, R. E. (1973). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 310, 111.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. G. (1964). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 90, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulier, S., Ribadeau-Dumas, B. & Denamur, R. (1975) European Journal of Biochemistry 50, 445.Google Scholar
Spies, J. R. (1967). Analytical Chemistry 39, 1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeman, H. J., Both, P., Brinkhuis, J. A. & Van Der Spek, C. (1977). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 491, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K. & Osborn, M. (1969) Journal of Biological Chemistry 244, 4406.Google Scholar
Zittle, C. A. & Custer, J. H. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 788.Google Scholar